Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:32:24.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Measure of Light Pollution and the Populations of Cities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Arthur R. Upgren*
Affiliation:
Van Vleck Observatory

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A program to measure the night sky brightness has been in progress for some years in order to calibrate the extent of the night sky brightness surrounding the Van Vleck Observatory. Both the central intensity and the areal extent of the brightest sky caused by campus and city were repeatedly measured in order to gauge the extent of the problem. For this purpose, portable visual photometers were designed which have remained stable and usable for nearly a decade. They are now useful for the measurement of the effects of increases in urban growth and of the more flexible attitude of the campus administration toward excess campus lighting. The inability to define city populations which realistically model and predict the measured sky brightness is the largest source of uncertainty. The observatory is in the Northeastern Corridor where the observed brightness is the sum of the illumination from a number of overlapping city sources. Present light pollution studies have not correctly defined the model for the population of an urban area. The two paradigmatic definitions now available for use are shown to be flawed for light pollution comparisons. An algorithm, unlike any in present use, must be sought which distinguishes between individual core cities within metropolitan areas.

Type
Light Pollution
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1991

References

Chandler, T. and Fox, G. 1974, “Three Thousand Years of Urban Growth”, Academic Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Dawson, D.W. 1984, in “Advances in Photoelectric Photometry, Vol. 2”, Wolpert, R.C. and Genet, R.M. eds., Fairborn Observatory, Fairborn, Ohio, p. 30.Google Scholar
Forstall, R. 1970, Private Correspondence with Chandler, T..Google Scholar
Garstang, R.H. 1986, Publ. Ast. Soc. Pacific 98, 364. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnaert, M. 1954, “The Nature of Light and Color in the Open Air”, Dover Publications Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Pike, R. and Berry, R. 1978, Sky and Telescope 55, 126.Google Scholar
Smith, A.R. 1974, “Connecticut: A Thematic Atlas”, Central Conn. State Univ., New Britain.Google Scholar
Upgren, A.R., Armandroff, T.E. and Dawson, D.W. 1981, Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 13, 813.Google Scholar
Walker, M.F. 1973, Publ. Ast. Soc. Pacific 85, 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar