Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:35:32.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Massive Contact Binary RY Scuti: A WR+OB Progenitor and Its Compact Nebula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Nathan Smith  and
Robert D. Gehrz
Nathan Smith
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of Minnesota, 116 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Robert D. Gehrz
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of Minnesota, 116 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

RY Scuti is a massive contact binary in a critical Roche-lobe overflow phase, and it may be an immediate progenitor of a WR+OB binary system like V444 Cygni. It may also have something in common with the eruptive binary HD 5980 in the SMC. RY Scuti is a nearby eclipsing binary, but basic parameters like the mass and evolutionary state of its individual components seem difficult to nail down because it is a common-envelope system. It is also surrounded by a compact double-ring nebula with geometry and kinematics that have interesting implications for its mass-loss mechanism. Some recent results of high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy of the nebula are reviewed here.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 187: Exotic Stars as Challenges to Evolution , 2002 , pp. 325 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2002

References

Antokhina, É.A., & Cherapashchuk, A.M. 1988, Pis’ma Astron. Zh., 14, 252 Google Scholar
Edlén, B., & Swings, J.P. 1939, Observatory, 62, 234 Google Scholar
Gehrz, R.D., Smith, N., Jones, B., Puetter, R., & Yahil, A. 2001, ApJ, 559, 395 Google Scholar
Gehrz, R.D. et al. 1995, ApJ, 439, 417 Google Scholar
Giuricin, G., & Mardirossian, F. 1981, A&A, 101, 138 Google Scholar
King, A.R., & Jameson, R.F. 1979, A&A, 71, 326 Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, G., Auer, L.H., Georgiev, L., & Guinan, E. 1998, AP J, 496, 934 Google Scholar
Merrill, P.W. 1928, ApJ, 67, 179 Google Scholar
Milano, L. et al. 1981, A&A, 100, 59 Google Scholar
Moffat, A.F.J., et al. 1998, ApJ, 497, 896 Google Scholar
Sahade, J., Brandi, E., & Fontenla, J.M. 1984, A&A SS, 56, 17 Google Scholar
Smith, N., Gehrz, R.D., & Goss, W.M. 2001, AJ, 122, 2700 Google Scholar
Smith, N., Gehrz, R.D., Stahl, O., Balick, B., & Kaufer, A. 2002, ApJ, in pressGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 960 Google Scholar
Stahl, O., et al. 1983, A&A, 127, 49 Google Scholar
Wolf, B. 1989, A&A, 217, 87 Google Scholar