Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:43:02.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Link between Radiation-Driven Winds and Pulsation in Massive Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

S.P. Owocki
Affiliation:
Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716USA; [email protected]
S.R. Cranmer
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138USA; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hot, luminous, massive stars have strong stellar winds driven by line-scattering of the star’s continuum radiation. They are also often observed to exhibit radial or non-radial pulsations. Such pulsations are possible candidates for providing the base perturbations that induce large-scale structure in the overlying wind, and as such they could help explain various observational manifestions of wind variability, e.g., absorption enhancemens or modulations in UV P-Cygni lines of OB stars, and perhaps even moving bumps in optical emission lines of Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars. Here we review the physics of line driving, with emphasis on how perturbations induce variations in a wind outflow. In particular, we present results of a time-dependent dynamical simulation of wind variations induced by the radial pulsation of the β Cep variable BW Vulpeculae, and show that observed variability in UV wind lines can be quite well reproduced by synthetic line profiles for this model. We conclude with a discussion of recent evidence that resonances among multiple modes of non-radial pulsation in Be stars play a role in inducing mass ejections that contribute to formation of a circumstellar disk.

Type
Part 5. Mass Loss in Pulsating Stars
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2002

References

Abbott, D. 1980, ApJ, 242, 1183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomme, R. & Hensberge, H. 1985, A&A, 148, 97 Google Scholar
Burger, M., de Jager, C., van den Oord, G., & Sato, N. 1982, A&A, 107, 320 Google Scholar
Buta, M. & Smith, R. 1979, ApJ, 232, 213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castor, J., Abbott, D., & Klein, R. 1975, Apj, 195, 157 (CAK)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranmer, S. 1996, PhD Thesis, University of Delaware, USA Google Scholar
Cranmer, S., & Owocki, S. 1996, ApJ, 462, 469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmeier, A. 1995, A&A, 299, 523 Google Scholar
Furenlid, I., Young, A., Meylan, T., et al. 1987, ApJ, 319, 264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayley, K. 1995, ApJ, 454, 410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, P. 1995, PhD Thesis, University of Tuebingen, Germany Google Scholar
Kroll, P. & Hanuschik, R.W., 1997, ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 121, Accretion Phenomena & Related Outflows, eds. Wickramasinghe, D., Bicknell, G., & Ferrarlo, L., (San Francisco ASP), 494 Google Scholar
Massa, D. 1994, Ap&SS, 221, 113 Google Scholar
Owocki, S., Castor, J., Rybicki, G. 1988, Apj, 335, 914 (OCR)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owocki, S., Cranmer, J., Fullerton, A. 1995, Apj, 453, L37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owocki, S. & Puls, J. 1999, ApJ, 510, 355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owocki, S. & Rybicki, G. 1984, ApJ, 284, 337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owocki, S. & Rybicki, G. 1985, ApJ, 299, 265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owocki, S. & Rybicki, G. 1986, ApJ, 309, 127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivinius, T., Baade, D., & Stefl, S. 2001, A&A, 369, 1058 Google Scholar
Townsend, R. 1997, PhD Thesis, University College London, UK Google Scholar