Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:51:29.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intercomparison of Lunar Laser and Traditional Determinations of Earth Rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

H. F. Fliegel
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California91109
J. O. Dickey
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California91109
J. G. Williams
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California91109

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The rotational orientation of the earth (UTO at McDonald Observatory) has been determined from lunar laser ranging (LLR) measurements for the interval 1971 to 1980. The results have been differenced from those obtained by conventional means as published by the Bureau International de l’Heure (BIH), on its 1979 system. The difference displays a quasi-seasonal signature, which we ascribe to systematic errors in the conventional measurements. The lunar data are well represented by a smooth curve, which gives UTO at McDonald with a precision of about 3/4 milliseconds or better, and UT1 to within 1 millisecond using BIH polar coordinates.

Type
Part I
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1982

References

Calame, O.: 1980, “Earth Rotation by Lunar Distances (EROLD),” Annual Report for l979, Bureau International de l’Heure, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Dickey, J. O., Williams, J. G., and Yoder, C. F.: 1980, “Results from Lunar Laser Ranging”, EOS. 61, 46, p. 939.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1981, Astron. and Astrophys., in press.Google Scholar
Harris, A. W. and Williams, J. G.: 1977, in Scientific Applications of Lunar Laser Ranging, pp. 179190, ed. Mulholland, J. D., Reidel, D., Dordrecht-Holland.Google Scholar
King, R. W., Counselman, C. C., and Shapiro, I.I.: 1978, J. Geophys. Res., 83, B7, pp. 33773381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, R. B., King, R. W., and Shapiro, I. I.: 1981, J. Geophys. Res., in press.Google Scholar
Lieske, J. H., Lederle, T., Fricke, W., and Morando, W.: 1977, Astron. and Astrophys. 58, 1.Google Scholar
Lieske, J. H.: 1979, Astron. and Astrophys. 73, 282.Google Scholar
Merriam, J. B. and Lambeck, K.: 1980, Geonhys. J. Royal Astron. Soc. 62, 551.Google Scholar
Seidelmann, P. K., Abalakin, V. K., Kinoshita, H., Kovalevsky, J., Murray, C. A., Smith, M. L., Vicente, R. O., Williams, J. G., and Yatskiv, Ya S.: 1982, Celestial Mechanics, in press.Google Scholar
Shelus, P. J., Evans, S. W., and Mulholland, J. D.: 1977 in Scientific Applications of Lunar Laser Ranging, pp. 191200, Mulholland, D., Reidel, D., Dordrecht-Holland.Google Scholar
Stolz, A., Bender, P. L., Faller, J. E., Silverberg, E. C., Mulholland, J. D., Shelus, P. J., Williams, J. G., Carter, W. E., Currie, D. G., and Kaula, W. M.: 1976, Science, 193, pp. 997999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahr, J. M., Sasso, T., and Smith, M. L., 1981: Geophys. J. Rovai Astron. Soc. 64. pp. 635650.Google Scholar
Williams, J. G. and Melbourne, W. G.: 1982, these proceedings, pp. 293303.Google Scholar
Yoder, C. F., Williams, J. G., and Parke, M. E.: 1981, J. Geophys. Res. 86. 881.Google Scholar
Yoder, C. F., Williams, J. G., Parke, M. E., and Dickey, J. O.: 1981, Annales de Geophysique, in press.Google Scholar