Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:20:39.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instability, Turbulence, and Enhanced Transport in Accretion Disks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Steven A. Balbus
Affiliation:
VITA, Astronomy Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA 22903
John F. Hawley
Affiliation:
VITA, Astronomy Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA 22903

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The nature of MHD and hydrodynamical turbulence in accretion disks is discussed. Comparison is made with planar Couette flow, a classical system prone to nonlinear shear instability resulting in enhanced turbulent transport. Both Keplerian and non-Keplerian hydrodynamical disks are studied, and it is found that only constant angular momentum disks are unstable to nonlinear disturbances and develop enhanced turbulent transport. Convective instabilities do not lead to enhanced turbulent transport. Hydrodynamical Keplerian disks are quite stable to nonlinear disturbances. Several lines of argument are presented which all lead to this conclusion, but the key to disk turbulence is the interaction between the stress tensor and the mean flow gradients. The nature of this coupling is found to determine completely the stability properties of disks (hydrodynamics and magnetic), and the nature of turbulent transport. The weak field MHD instability, which is of great astrophysical importance, displays the same type of stress tensor – mean flow coupling that all classical local shear instabilities exhibit. Hydrodynamical Keplerian disks, on the other hand, do not. Accretion disk turbulence is MHD turbulence.

Type
Part 3. Fundamental Physical Processes
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1997

References

Balbus, S.A., & Hawley, J.F. 1991, ApJ, 376, 214 Google Scholar
Balbus, S.A., & Hawley, J.F. 1992, ApJ, 392, 662 Google Scholar
Balbus, S.A., & Hawley, J.F., & Stone, J.M. 1996, ApJ, 467, 76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummell, N., Cattaneo, F., & Toomre, J. 1995, Science, 269, 1370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazin, P.G., & Reid, W.H. 1981, Hydrodynamic Stability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gammie, C.F. 1996, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Hawley, J.F. 1991, ApJ, 381, 496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, J.F., & Balbus, S.A. 1996, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Spruit, H. 1987, A&A, 184, 173 Google Scholar
Stone, J.M., & Balbus, S.A. 1996, ApJ, 464, 364 Google Scholar
Tennekes, H., & Lumley, J.L. 1972, A First Course in Turbulence (Cambridge:MIT Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toomre, A. 1981, in The Structure and Evolution of Normal Galaxies, Fall, S.M. & Lynden-Bell, D., (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 111 Google Scholar
Tout, C.A. 1996, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Zahn, J.P. 1987, in The Internal Solar angular Velocity, Durney, B.R. & Sofia, S., (Dordrecht: Reidel), 201 Google Scholar