Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:48:03.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Millisecond Pulsar Companions: Constraints on Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

S. C. Lundgren
Affiliation:
Remote Sensing Division, Code 7213, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
R. S. Foster
Affiliation:
Remote Sensing Division, Code 7213, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
F. Camilo
Affiliation:
The University of Manchester, NRAL, Jodrell Bank, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In observations of six binary millisecond pulsars with the Hubble Space Telescope, we have discovered white dwarf companions to PSRs J0034-0534, J1022+1001, J1713+0747, and J2019+2425 and improved photometry on PSRs J1640+2224 and J2145-0750. Three of the white dwarfs are among the coolest and oldest known. We have determined that the masses for the helium companions are consistent with the expectation based on the core mass of a progenitor that filled its Roche lobe. The cooling times for many of the white dwarfs are much less than the characteristic spin-down times, implying that the spin period at the end of the accretion stage was close to the current period. The initial spin periods calculated are used to place limits on the accretion rate at the end of the low-mass X-ray binary phase. The accretion rates are found to be over an order of magnitude less than the Eddington rate.

Type
Part 7 Binary Systems
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1996

References

Bell, J.F. & Bailes, M. 1996, Astrophys. J., 456, L33 Google Scholar
Bell, J.F., Bailes, M., & Bessell, M.S. 1993, Nature, 364, 603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J.F., Kulkarni, S.R., Bailes, M., Leitch, E.M., & Lyne, A.G. 1995, Astrophys. J., 452, L121 Google Scholar
Bergeron, P., Saumon, D., & Wesemael, F. 1995, Astrophys. J., 443, 764 Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, D. & van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 1991, Phys. Rep., 203, 1 Google Scholar
Burstein, D. & Heiles, C. 1982, Astron. J., 87, 1165 Google Scholar
Camilo, F., Foster, R.S., & Wolszczan, A. 1994, Astrophys. J., 437, L39 Google Scholar
Danziger, I.J., Baade, D., & Della Valle, M. 1993, Astr. Astrophys., 276, 382 Google Scholar
Hamada, T. & Salpeter, E.E. 1961, Astrophys. J., 134, 683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtzman, J.A., Burrows, C.J., Casertano, S., Hester, J.J., Trauger, J.T., Watson, A.M., & Worthey, G. 1995a, Publ. Astr. Soc. Pacific, 107, 1065 Google Scholar
Holtzman, J.A. et al. 1995b, Publ. Astr. Soc. Pacific, 107, 156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorimer, D.R., Lyne, A.G., Festin, L., & Nicastro, L. 1995, Nature, 376, 393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgren, S.C., Cordes, J.M., Foster, R.S., Wolszczan, A., & Camilo, F. 1996, Astrophys. J., 458, L33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monet, D.G., Dahn, C.C., Vrba, F.J., Harris, H.C., Pier, J.R., Luginbuhl, C.B., & Ables, H.D. 1992, Astron. J., 103, 638 Google Scholar
Rappaport, S., Podsiadlowski, P., Joss, P.C., DiStefano, R., & Han, Z. 1995, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc, 273, 731 Google Scholar
Taylor, J.H. & Cordes, J.M. 1993, Astrophys. J., 411, 674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.H., Manchester, R.N., Lyne, A.G., & Camilo, F. 1995, unpublished, anonymous ftp at [pulsar.princeton.edu]:pub/catalogGoogle Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 1994, Astr. Astrophys., 291, L39 Google Scholar
Whitmore, B. 1995, in Photometry with the WFPC2, http://www.stsci.edu/ Google Scholar
Wood, M.A. 1992, Astrophys. J., 386, 539 Google Scholar