Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:15:22.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evolution of Binary Stars into Contact States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

R W Hilditch
R W Hilditch*
Affiliation:
University Observatory,St Andrews, Fife KY16 9LZ,Scotland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Good-quality empirical results on 62 short-period binary stars recently summarised by Hilditch & Bell (1987) and Hilditch, King & McFarlane (1988) are discussed in terms of evolutionary paths from detached to semi-detached and contact states. These data suggest two evolutionary paths to the contact binaries - from detached systems directly into contact to form initially shallow-contact systems, and via case A mass transfer to semi-detached states, thence to contact systems. These empirical results support previous arguments based on evolutionary models and less detailed observational data.

Concern is expressed about the paucity of high-quality spectroscopic data, particularly for low-mass systems displaying EB-type light curves and the resultant limitations on analyses of those light curves. Such systems provide tests of evolution into contact for the first time, or of broken-contact phases for WUMa-type binaries. The crucial importance of long-term monitoring (decades) of times of minima as indicators of mass transfer rates amongst these interacting binaries is also noted.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 107: Algols , 1989 , pp. 289 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1989

References

Budding, E, 1984, Astr Astrophys, 130, 324.Google Scholar
Clausen, J V & Grønbech, B, 1977, Astr Astrophys Suppl Ser, 28, 389.Google Scholar
Conover, W J, 1971, In: ‘Practical Nonparametric Statistics’, p223, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Doom, C, 1984, Astr Astrophys, 138, 101.Google Scholar
Duerbeck, H W & Karimie, M T, 1979, IAU Inf Bull Var Stars, 1617.Google Scholar
Hilditch, R W & King, D J, 1986, Mon Not R astr Soc 223, 581.Google Scholar
Hilditch, R W & Bell, S A, 1987, Mon Not R astr Soc 229, 529.Google Scholar
Hilditch, R W, King, D J, Hill, G & Poeckert, R, 1984 Mon Not R astr Soc 208, 135.Google Scholar
Hilditch, R.W., King, D.J. and McFarlane, T.M. 1988, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 231, 341.Google Scholar
Kaluzny, J. 1985, Acta Astr. 35, 313.Google Scholar
Kaluzny, J. and Semeniuk, I. 1984, Acta Astr. 34, 433.Google Scholar
Kippenhahn, R. and Weigert, A. 1967, Z Astrophys. 65, 251.Google Scholar
Lipari, S.L. and Sistero, R.F. 1986, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 220, 883.Google Scholar
Lubow, S.H. and Shu, F.H. 1975, Astrophys. J. 198, 383.Google Scholar
Lucy, L.B. and Wilson, R.E. 1979, Astrophys. J. 231, 502.Google Scholar
McFarlane, T.M., Hilditch, R.W. and King, D.J. 1986, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 223, 595.Google Scholar
Mauder, H. 1982. In “Binary and Multiple Stars as Tracers of Stellar Evolution”, IAU Coll. No. 69, p.275, eds. Kopal, Z. and Rahe, J., (Reidel, Dordrecht).Google Scholar
Mochnackl, S.M. 1981, Astrophys. J. 245, 650.Google Scholar
Moss, D.L. 1971, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 153, 41.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1971, Ann. Rev. Astr. Astrophys 9, 183.Google Scholar
Popper, D.M. 1980, Ann. Rev. Astr. Astrophys. 18, 115.Google Scholar
Popper, D.M. 1982, Astrophys. J. 262, 641.Google Scholar
Rucinski, S.M. 1986. In “Instrumentation and Research Programmes for Small Telescopes”, IAU Symp. No. 118, p.421, eds. Hearnshaw, J.B. and Cottrell, P.L., (Reidel, Dordrecht).Google Scholar
Sybesma, C.H.B. 1985a. In “Birth and Evolution of Massive Stars and Stellar Groups”, p.183, eds. van Woerden, H. and Boland, W., (Reidel, Dordrecht).Google Scholar
Sybesma, C.H.B. 1985b, Astr. Astrophys. 142, 171.Google Scholar
Sybesma, C.H.B. 1986, Astr. Astrophys. 159, 108.Google Scholar
Webbink, R.F. 1976, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 32, 583.Google Scholar