Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:43:24.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence from Spectra of Bright Fireballs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Zdeněk Ceplecha
Zdeněk Ceplecha*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute of the Czechoslovak Academy of SciencesOndřejov, Czechoslovakia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Spectral data with dispersions from 11 to 94 Å/mm on 4 fireballs of actual brightness of —4 to —12 magnitude and with velocities of about 30 km/s at 70 to 80 km heights are used for studies of meteor radiation problems. Previously published analyses need revision for two main reasons: (a) the absolute values of oscillator strengths of Fe I lines from laboratory data were recently recognized to be 1 order of magnitude lower, (b) the luminous efficiency factor τ of Fe I is now much better known from several different experiments. The radiation of fireballs is found to be strongly affected by self-absorption. But if the emission curve of growth is used for correction oj the self-absorption of Fe I lines, a great discrepancy between spectral data and efficiency data for total Fe I light is found. If one assumes that the self-absorption is superposed on another effect, a decrease of the dimensions of the radiating volume with increasing lower potential E1, the spectral data on Fe I lines will be in agreement with the luminous efficiency of total Fe I meteor radiation. Formulas for emission curve of growth and Boltzmann distribution including this effect are derived. This effect is important for fireballs brighter than about —1 or — 2 magnitude, while self-absorption seems to be important even for fainter meteors. The optically thin radiation of all Fe I lines might be expected for meteors fainter than +5 magnitude. Excitation temperature of 5500° K and relaxation time of 0.02 s were found as typical values for the Fe I radiation of fireballs studied. The light of fireballs is emitted during a relatively long relaxation time, which is many orders of magnitude longer than the time necessary for spontaneous radiation of excited Fe I atoms. The dimensions of the radiating volume of Fe I gas for lines with E1 = 0 were found to be 0.3X9 m at 0 absolute magnitude and 2×60 m at —10 absolute magnitude. It ivas not possible to determine any realistic abundances of other elements due to small numbers of lines for an analysis independent of Fe I, while the Fe I curve of growth cannot be used for other elements, because the radiation originates mainly from the effective surface of the radiating volume. A general formula for meteor radiation is also derived and compared with the conventional luminosity equation.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 13: Evolutionary and Physical Properties of Meteoroids , June 1971 , pp. 89 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © NASA 1971

References

Allen, C. W., 1963. Astrophysical quantities, The Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
Anon, 1962. U.S. standard atmosphere, 1962, U.S. Committee on Extension of the Standard Atmosphere Supt. of Documents, Washington.Google Scholar
Ayers, W. G., McCrosky, R. E., and Shao, C.-Y., 1970. Photographic observations of 10 artificial meteors, Smithson. Astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rept., No. 317.Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z., 1964. Study of a bright meteor flare by means of emission curve of growth, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 15, 102–112.Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z., 1965. Complete data on bright meteor 32281, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 16, 88–101.Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z., 1966. Complete data on iron meteoroid (meteor 36221), Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 17, 195–206 Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z., 1967. Spectroscopic analysis of iron meteoroid radiation, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 18, 303–310.Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z., 1968. Meteor Spectra, in Physics and Dynamics of Meteors, edited by Kresák, L. and Millman, P. M., D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrech, Holland, 73–83.Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z., 1971. Spectral data on terminal flare and wake of double-station meteor No. 38421, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 22, 219–304.Google Scholar
Ceplecha, Z. and Rajchl, J., 1963. The meteor spectrum with dispersion from 11 to 38 A/mm, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 14, 29–49.Google Scholar
Corliss, C. H. AND Bozman, W. R., 1962. Experimental transition probabilities for spectral lines of seventy elements, NBS Monograph 53, Supt. of Documents, Washington.Google Scholar
Corliss, C. H. AND Warner, B., 1964. Absolute oscillator strengths for Fe I, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 8, 395.Google Scholar
Friichtenicht, J. F., Slattery, J. C., and Tagliaferri, E., 1968. A laboratory measurement of meteor luminous efficiency, Astrophys. J., 151, 747–758.Google Scholar
Garz, T. and Kock, M., 1969. Experimentelle Oszillatorenstärken von Fe I-Linien, Astron. Astrophys., 2, 274–279.Google Scholar
Grasdalen, G. L., Huber, M., and Parkinson, W. H., 1969. Absolute gf-values for Fe I and and Fe II lines, Astrophys. J., 156, 1153–1173.Google Scholar
Harvey, G. A., 1970. Spectra of faint optical meteors, presented at 13th Plenary Meeting of COSPAR, Leningrad, unpublished.Google Scholar
McCrosky, R. E., 1968. Meteors without sodium, Smithson. Astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rept. No. 270.Google Scholar
Moore, C. E., 1945. A multiplet table of astrophysical interest, Contrib. Princeton Obs. No. 20.Google Scholar
Wiese, W. L., Smith, M. W., and Clennon, B. M., 1966. Atomic transition probabilities, National Standard Reference Data Series, NBS 4, Washington.Google Scholar
Wiese, W. L., Smith, M. W., and Miles, B. M., 1969. Atomic transition probabilities, National Standard Reference Data Series, NBS 22, Washington.Google Scholar