No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Errors in numerical integrations and chaotic motions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2016
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The methods to estimate the integration errors, including the effects of truncation, rounding off, and instability of the solutions, are discussed. Polynomial error accumulation depends upon numerical method, stepsize, orbital period and also eccentricity; it is also machine dependent. Comets correspond to the most difficult case of exponentially diverging orbits; however they can be very close to resonant ordered regions.
- Type
- Section IV. Dynamics of Comets: Numerical Modelling
- Information
- International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 83: Dynamics of Comets: Their Origin and Evolution , 1985 , pp. 215 - 226
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985
References
Benettin, G., Galgani, L., Giorgilli, A. and Strelcyn, J.M. (1980) Meccanica, March 1980, 9.Google Scholar
Fabri, E. and Penco, U. (1984) “Propagation of the Round-off Errors in Numerical Integrations”, in preparation.Google Scholar
Heinrici, P. (1962) Discrete Variable Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations, John Wily & Sons, New York-London.Google Scholar
Wintner, A. (1941) The Analytical Foundations of Celestial Mechanics, Princeton Univ. Press.
Google Scholar
Cohen, C.J., Hubbard, E.C. and Oesterwinter, C. (1973) Astr. Pap. Am. Ephem.
22, pt. 1.Google Scholar