Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:39:48.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Earth rotation from a simultaneous reduction of LLR and LAGEOS laser ranging data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Peter J. Shelus
Affiliation:
McDonald Observatory and Department of Astronomy
Nelson R. Zarate
Affiliation:
McDonald Observatory and Department of Astronomy
Richard J. Eanes
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712 USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As the techniques of lunar and artificial satellite laser ranging mature, emphasis is being placed upon the use of these observations to monitor the Earth’s rotation. It is important to note, however, that at the present time neither technique alone can furnish all three components of this rotation to an accuracy which surpasses those results obtained from classical techniques. In the case of LAGEOS laser ranging, unmodeled secular orbital effects couple with axial Earth rotation in such a way that these effects are not separable in the analysis of those observations. In the case of lunar laser ranging, observations have been regularly available only from a single station for the past ten years or so with the result that a change in latitude along the McDonald Observatory meridian is not separable into the ordinary (x,y) components of polar motion. The main purpose of this paper is to present the first stages of an investigation to combine LAGEOS and lunar laser ranging observations. It is hoped that the proper implementation of such a process might eliminate the shortcomings inherent in each technique, while accentuating the advantages of each. This has the potential of producing all three components of the Earth’s rotation to an accuracy and precision which is compatible with the present observational uncertainties.

Type
Part I
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1982

References

McClure, P.: 1973, Goddard Report X-592-73-259.Google Scholar
Melchior, P.: 1971, Celestial Mechanics 4, 190.Google Scholar
Shelus, P.J., Evans, S.W., and Mulholland, J.D.: 1975, in Scientific Applications of Lunar Laser Ranging, ed. Mulholland, J. D., D. Reidel Co., Dordrecht, p. 191.Google Scholar
Stolz, A. and Larden, D.: 1975, in Scientific Applications of Lunar Laser Ranging, ed. Mulholland, J. D., D. Reidel Co., Dordrecht, P. 201.Google Scholar
Wahr, J.M.: 1979, The Tidal Motions of a Rotating, Elliptical, Elastic and Oceanless Earth, Ph,D. thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Williams, J.G.: 1974, JPL Engineering Memorandum 391-592.Google Scholar
Woolard, E.W.: 1953, Astronomical Papers of the American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac 15, part 1.Google Scholar
Woolard, E.W.: 1959, Astronomical Journal 64, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, C.F., Williams, J.G., and Parke, M.E.: 1981, Journal of Geophysical Research 86, 881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar