Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:29:00.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamical state of pairs of galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

I. D. Karachentsev
I. D. Karachentsev*
Affiliation:
Special Astrophysical Observatory, Academy of Sciences of USSR

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Les estimations de masses de galaxies doubles sont obtenues sur la base des observations récentes de 148 paires de galaxies pour lesquelles les vitesses radiales des deux composantes ont été mesurées.

On montre que le rapport masse orbitale moyenne sur luminosité dépend essentiellement du type morphologique des galaxies doubles et du type d’interaction entre les deux composantes de la paire. Les valeurs minimales de ce rapport sont obtenues pour les galaxies doubles dont les caractéristiques d’interaction sont linéaires, à savoir: ponts, queues, ainsi que pour les paires avec des composantes compactes et des galaxies de Markarian,

La relation empirique entre le rapport masse-luminosité et la séparation spatiale des composantes de paires ne montre pas de façon évidente l’existence de halos stellaires cachés autour des galaxies doubles,

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 37: Décalages vers le rouge et Expansion de l’Univers , 1977 , pp. 321 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Editions du CNRS 1977

References

Arp, H., 1966, Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, Astrophys. J., Suppl., 1, 3.Google Scholar
Chiao, R. Y., Reinchardt, M., 1973, Astron. & Astrophys., 22, 257.Google Scholar
Einasto, J., Kaasik, A., Saar, E., 1974, Nature, 250, 309.Google Scholar
Faber, S. M., Kackson, R. E., 1976, Astrophys. J., 204, 668.Google Scholar
Fesenko, B. I., 1976, Astron. Zh., 53, 112.Google Scholar
Holmberg, E., 1937, Lund Ann., 6, 3.Google Scholar
Jenner, D. C., 1974, Astrophys. J., 191, 55.Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., 1970, Astron. Zh., 47, 509.Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I., Shcherbanovsky, A., 1970, Acta Astron., 20, 373.Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., 1972, Catalogue of Isolated Pairs of Galaxies in Northern Hemisphere, Soobshch. Spets. Astrofiz. Obs., USSR Acad. Sci., 7, 3.Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., 1974, Soobshch. Spets. Astrofiz. Obs., USSR Acad. Sci., 11, 51.Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., 1975, in: Proceedings of the Third European Astronomical Meeting, Tbilisi, 439.Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., Chuvaev, K. K., Pronik, V. I., 1976, Astron. & Astroph. (in press).Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., 1976, (in preparation).Google Scholar
Lundmark, K., 1927, Upsala Medd., 30, 3.Google Scholar
Noerdlinger, P. D., 1975, Astrophys. J., 197, 545.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J. P., Peebles, P. J. P., 1973, Astrophys. J., 186, 467.Google Scholar
Page, T., 1952, Astrophys. J., 116, 63.Google Scholar
Page, T., in: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Univ. of California Press, 277.Google Scholar
Toomre, A., 1974, in: The Formation and Dynamics of Galaxies, IAU Symp. n”58, Dordrecht, 347.Google Scholar
Tully, R. B., private communication.Google Scholar
Turner, E. L., 1976, Binary galaxies, I – II, preprint.Google Scholar
Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B. A., 1959, Atlas and Catalogue of Interactin Galaxies, Moscow State Univ., Moscow.Google Scholar
Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B. A., Krasnogorskaja, A. A., Arkhipova, V. P., 1962-1968, Morphological Catalogue of Galaxies, I-IV, Moscow State Univ., Moscow.Google Scholar
Zonn, W., 1968, Acta Astron., 18, 549.Google Scholar
Zwicky, F., Herzog, E., Wild, P., Karpowicz, M., Kowal, C., 1961-1968, Catalogue of Galaxies and of Clusters of Galaxies, I-IV, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.Google Scholar
Zwicky, F., 1971, Catalogue of Selected Compact Galaxies and Post-Eruptive Galaxies, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar