Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T06:49:15.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consistency of Nutation Modeling in Radio Source Position Comparisons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

O.J. Sovers
O.J. Sovers*
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, California 91109

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Comparisons between sets of radio source coordinates determined from independent VLBI measurements show that rotational offsets can be as large as several milliarcseconds (mas), and are considerably larger than the positional uncertainties (≤1 mas). The 1 to 2 mas discrepancies remaining after removal of the rotational offsets indicate the present true level of accuracy. Analyses of DSN and CDP astrometric data are performed to explore the effects of alternative schemes of nutation modeling on such catalog comparisons. It is concluded that rotations between different source catalogs are minimized or eliminated if the nutation models employed are consistent. Intrinsic source coordinate discrepancies, however, remain at the 1 mas level.

Type
Part 1. Oral Papers
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 127: Reference Systems , 1991 , pp. 130 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © United States Naval Observatory 1991

References

Charlot, P.: 1990, Astron. Astrophys. 99, 1309.Google Scholar
Eubanks, T.M., Carter, M.S., Josties, F.J., Matsakis, D.M., and McCarthy, D.D.: 1990, Paper presented at this meeting.Google Scholar
Herring, T.A., Gwinn, C.R., and Shapiro, I.I.: 1986, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 4745.Google Scholar
International Earth Rotation Service: 1989, IERS> Standards, IERS Technical Note 3, Ed. McCarthy, D. D., Paris, France.Google Scholar
International Earth Rotation Service: 1990, Annual Report for 1989, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Ma, C., Shaffer, D.B., de Vegt, C., Johnston, K.J., and Russell, J.: 1990, Astron. J. 99, 1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melbourne, W., Anderle, R., Feissel, M., King, R., McCarthy, D., Smith, D., Tapley, B., Vicente, R.: 1983, Project MERIT Standards, USNO Circular No. 167, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Robertson, D.S., Fallon, F.W., and Carter, W.E.: 1986, Astron. J. 91, 1456.Google Scholar
Sovers, O.J., Edwards, C.D., Jacobs, C.S.. Lanyi, G.E., Liewer, K.M., and Treuhaft, R.N.: 1988, Astron. J. 95, 1647.Google Scholar
Sovers, O.J., and Fanselow, J.L.: 1987, JPL/NASA Publ. 83-39, Rev. 3. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Google Scholar
Steppe, J.A., Oliveau, S.H., and Sovers, O.J.: 1990, IERS Technical Note 2, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Treuhaft, R.N., and Lanyi, G.E.: 1987, Radio Sci. 22, 251.Google Scholar
Zhu, S.Y., Groten, E., and Reigber, Ch.: 1990, Astron. J. 99, 1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar