Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T06:10:31.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of ELG and UV Galaxies from the SBS Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

M. V. Gyulzadian
M. V. Gyulzadian*
Affiliation:
BAO, Byurakan 378133, Armenia, E-mail:[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we compare the results of spectrophotometric observations for more then 40 emission line galaxies (ELG) without UV-excess and 70 galaxies with UV-excess (UV-galaxies) from the Second Byurakan Survey (SBS) carried out with the scanner on the 6-m telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory. The comparison was aimed to answer the questions: are there any essential differences between these two types of galaxies? And what is the fraction of AGN among ELG and UV-galaxies? To answer this question we have investigated some physical parameters. Great care was taken in classifying the spectra of these galaxies as “HII region-like or “AGN-like” using a new diagnostic method for emission-line galaxies (Rola et al.). We find that 14% of emission line galaxies (ELG) have Sy2 and LINER-like spectra. The transition or ambiguous objects among them comprise 20%. The fraction of LINER-like and Sy2 objects among UV-galaxies is 21% while that of the transition or ambiguous objects in UV-galaxies is 28%. From SBS galaxies, 18% are Sy2s and LINER-like galaxies.

Type
Part 1. Optical Surveys for AGN
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 184: AGN Surveys , 2002 , pp. 94 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2002

References

Arp, H. & Khachikian, E.Y., 1974, Astrofiz., 11, 207, 1975.Google Scholar
Begelman, Blandford, & Rees, , 1984, Rev.Mod.Phys. 6 255.Google Scholar
Begelman, McKee,& Shields, , 1983, APJ., 271 70. Google Scholar
Burenkov, A.N., 1991, Preprint of the SAO, No.67.Google Scholar
Gyulzadian, M., 1995a, Astrofiz., 32 501.Google Scholar
Gyulzadian, M., 1995b, IAU 171 386.Google Scholar
Markarian, B., 1967, Astrofiz., 3, 55.Google Scholar
Rola, C.S., Terlevich, E., and Terlevich, R., 1997, MNRAS, 289, 419.Google Scholar
Sahakian, K.A. & Khachikian, E.Y., 1975, Astrofiz., 11, 207.Google Scholar
Stepanian, J. et al., 1990, Astrofiz., 3 89.Google Scholar
Stepanian, J., Lipovetsky, V., Erastova, L. Shapavalova, A., Gyulzadian, M., 1992a, Astrofiz. Issled., 35 15.Google Scholar
Stepanian, J., Lipovetsky, V., Erastova, L., Gyulzadian, M. Izotov, Yu., Guseva, N., 1992b, Astrofiz. Issled., 35 32.Google Scholar