Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:41:16.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chandler Motion Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Ya. S. Yatskiv
Ya. S. Yatskiv*
Affiliation:
Main Astronomical Observatory, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03680 Kyiv-127, Ukraine, e-mail:[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The history of observations of the Chandler motion is presented in brief and the importance of the ninety years of the ILS data is stressed. Essential features and different empirical models of the Chandler motion are discussed.

Type
Part 5. Chandler and Annual Polar Motion: Observations and Excitation
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 178: Polar Motion: Historical and Scientific Problems , 2000 , pp. 381 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Brzeziński, A., 1992, High Frequency Oscillations of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole by Variations of the Effective Angular Momentum Function, Journées 1992, Système de Reference Spatio-Temporels, Paris, 102–107.Google Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1892, “On the variation of latitude (VII),” Astron. J., 12, 97.Google Scholar
Carter, W.E., 1981, “Frequency modulation of the Chandlerian component of polar motion,” J. Geophys. Res., 86, 1653–1658.Google Scholar
Colombo, G., Shapiro, I., 1968, “Theoretical model for the Chandler wobble,” Nature, 217, 156–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickman, S.R., 1981, “Investigation of controversial polar motion features using homogeneous International Latitude Service data,” J. Geophys. Res., 86, 4904–4912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, R.S., 1999, Combinations of Earth Orientation Measurements: SPACE 98, COMB98, and POLE, IPL Publication 99–6. Pasadena, California.Google Scholar
Guinot, B., 1972, “The Chandlerian wobble from 1900 to 1970,” Astron. Astrophys., 19, 207–214.Google Scholar
Fedorov, E.P., Korsun, A.A., Mayor, S.P., Panchenko, N.I., Tarady, V.K., Yatskiv, Ya.S., 1972, Motion of the Earth motion from 1890.0 to 1969.0 (in Russian), Nauková Dumka, Kyiv.Google Scholar
IERS Annual Reports, Observatoire de Paris.Google Scholar
Jochmann, H., 1981, “Die Eingans-Ausgans Analyse der Polbewegung mit Hilfe der Meteorologischen Erregefunktion,” Gerlands Beitr. Geophys., 90, N 6, 477–488.Google Scholar
Kimura, H., 1917, “Variations in the fourteen months’ component of the polar motion,” Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 78, 163.Google Scholar
Kołaczek, B., Kosek, W., 1998, “Variations of the amplitude of the Chandler oscillation,” Journées 1998, Paris, 215–221.Google Scholar
Lambeck, K., 1980, The Earth’s Variable Rotation, Cambridge University Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchior, P., 1957, Latitude Variation, Progress in Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Munk, W.H., MacDonald, G.J.F., 1960, The Rotation of the Earth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nastula, J., Korsun, A., Kołaczek, B., Kosek, W. and Hozakowski, N., 1993, “Variations of the Chandler and annual wobbles of polar motion in 1846-1988 and their prediction,” Manuscr. geod., 18, 131–136.Google Scholar
Okubo, S., 1982, “Is the Chandler period variable?,” Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc., 71, 629–646.Google Scholar
Pedersen, G.P., Rochester, M.G., 1972, Spectral analyses of the Chandler wobble, Rotation of the Earth, Reidel, Dordrecht, 33–38.Google Scholar
Pejovic, N., 1985, The stability of the amplitudes and phases of the Chandler’s, annual, and semi-annual terms in the polar motion, Publ., of the Department of Astronomy, XIII, N13. Beograd 31–39.Google Scholar
Rykhlova, L.V., 1970, “The pole coordinates for the years 1846-1891.5” Soob-shcheniya Gosudarstvenogo Astron. Inst. im. Shternberga, 163, 3. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Sekiguchi, N., 1975, “On the latitude variations in the interval between 1830 and 1860,” Journal of the Geodetic Seciety of Japan, 21, 131.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J., Pesek, I., Ron, C., Cepek, A., 1998, Earth orientation parameters 1899.7-1992.0 in the ICRS based on the HIPPARCOS reference frame, Publ. of the Astronomical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, N 87.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J., 1985, “Long-period behaviour of polar motion between 1900.0 and 1984.0,” Ann. Geophys. 3, 351–356.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J., 1992, “A Note on Analysis of Atmospheric Excitation of Polar Motion,” Journées 1992 Système de Reference Spatio-Temporels, Paris, 166–171.Google Scholar
Yatskiv, Ya.S., 1974, “Chandler wobble and free diurnal nutation derived from latitude observation,” Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Geodesy and Physics of the Earth, Potsdam, 143.Google Scholar
Yatskiv, Ya.S., 1997, “On the excitation of the Chandler wobble,” Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 13 N5, 42–47.Google Scholar
Yumi, S. and Yokoyama, K. 1980, “Results of the International Latitude Service in a homogeneous System 1899.9-1979.0,” Publ., of the Central Bureau of the IPMS, Mizusawa.Google Scholar