Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:53:12.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CCD Astrometry of the Solar System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J.-E. Arlot
Affiliation:
Bureau des Longitudes Paris, France
F. Colas
Affiliation:
Bureau des Longitudes Paris, France

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Astrometry in the solar system made more progress during the past ten years than it did during the seven or eight decades before. In fact, the development of large refractors with micrometers, and after the improvement of the photographic technique, allowed one to get very accurate positions at the end of the 19th century. After that, relatively little progress was made. Astronomers faced several difficulties: first, was the poor sensitivity of the photographic plates leading to long exposures and therefore to low accuracy for faint objects; second, was the poor quality of the catalogues of stars which depended upon a very small number of available astrometric reference stars.

New receptors appeared around the 1950, such as electronic cameras or T.V. tubes. But, most of these new receptors were not interesting for astrometry, mainly because of the field of view – which was too small – and of the difficulty of using such receptors. However, the development of a new technique based upon the CCD targets changed most of the astrometric observational programs. In fact, CCD receptors were made for small fields, but the CCDs were easy to use; the images were numerical, allowing processing by computers, and the sensitivity was much more important. Because of that, the accuracy increased and relative astrometry was developed. The recent development of new catalogues, such as the Guide Star Catalogue and Tycho, permits astronomers to reduce small fields, which was not possible earlier.

Type
Dynamics and Astrometry: Present and Future
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997

References

Arlot, J.-E. and Thuillot, W.: 1996, Proceedings of the workshop “PHESAT95” held in Bucharest, Romania, Sept. 1994, Supplément aux Annales de Physique 21.Google Scholar
Colas, F. and Arlot, J.-E.: 1991, “Comparisons of observations of the Martian satellites made in 1988 with ephemerides”, Astron. Astrophys. 252, 402.Google Scholar
Colas, J.F. and Buil, C.: 1992, “First Earth-based observations of Neptune’s satellite Proteus”, Astron. Astrophys. 262, L13.Google Scholar
Jones, D.H.P.: 1996, “Limitations on the accuracy possible in astrometrie observations of satellites of the major planets” in: Dynamics, Ephemerides and Astrometry of the Solar System, IAU Symposium 172 (Ferraz-Mello, S., Morando, B. Arlot, J.E., eds), Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Nicholson, P.D. and Matthews, K.: 1991, “Near-infrared observations of the Jovian ring and small satellites”, Icarus 93, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, P.D., Hamilton, D.P., Matthews, K., and Yoder, C.F.: 1992, “New observations of Saturn’s coorbital satellites”, Icarus 100, 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascu, D., Seidelmann, P.K., Baum, W.A., and Schmidt, R.E.: 1983, “Observations of faint planetary satellites with a charge-coupled device”, in: The Motion of Planets and Natural and Artificial Satellites (Ferraz-Mello, S. Nacozy, P.E, eds).Google Scholar
Pascu, D., Rohde, J.R., Seidelmann, P.K., Currie, D.G., Dowling, D.M. Wells, E., Kowal, C., Zellner, B., and Storrs, A.: 1995, “HST astrometry of the Uranian inner satellite system”, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 27, 829.Google Scholar
Veiga, C.H. and Vieira Martins, R.: 1996, “A method to define a reference system for the reduction of astrometrie positions of natural satellites”, Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser. 107, 551.Google Scholar
Veiga, C.H. and Vieira Martins, R.: 1996, “CCD observations of Triton”, Astron. Astrophys., in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, E.F. and Binzel, R.P.: 1993, “Comparative mapping of Pluto’s sub-Charon hemisphere: Three least squares models based on mutual event light curves”, Icarus 102, 134.Google Scholar
Young, L.A., Olkin, C.B., and Elliot, J.L.: 1994, “The Charon-Pluto mass ratio from MKO astrometry”, Icarus 108, 186.Google Scholar