Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:38:16.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2. Comets and the Cosmogony of the Solar System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The quantitative processes of eruptive development of planets into comets and other small bodies is studied from the Physical and Orbital evolution of these minor bodies. The escape of comets (and of their products of decay) into interstellar space has been of the order of 1030 to 1031 during the lifetime of the solar system. The mean density of the planets and of their large satellites, and their specific rotational energy, serve as independent checks of the amount of lost material. As far back as 1955 and 1962, the eruption theory has predicted the high volcanic activity on Venus and Mars and on some satellites, that was actually discovered by Mariner 10 and Venus 9-10. Interstellar molecules confirm that ejection of cometary gases is widespread in the Galaxy. Six new bright short-period comets discovered in 1975 provide direct evidence for comet formation in the system of Jupiter in its 1961-1969 period of high activity. Brought together, these facts prove that planetary bodies began their existence at stellar temperatures. They cooled down from the surface, forming crusts of rocky and icy materials, that have initiated a long period of eruptive evolution, characterized by numerous cataclysms with the ejection of tremendous amounts of gas and dust, separated by more quiescent phases, like the present state of the earth. Comets, asteroids, meteoritic and meteoric material bear witness for the explosive processes on planetary bodies.

Type
Part VIII. The Origin of Comets
Copyright
Copyright © A.H. Delsemme 1977

References

Dauvillier, A. 1954, Mem. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège, 4e Series, 14, 506.Google Scholar
Everhart, E. 1969, Astron. J., 74, 735.Google Scholar
Fesenkov, V. G. 1952, Voprosy kosmogonii. Akad. Nauk SSSR, N 1, p. 129.Google Scholar
Highlights of Astronomy, 1971, 2, 193, ed. Middlehurst, B..Google Scholar
Kuiper, G. 1949, Atmospheres of the Earth and Planets, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kuiper, G. 1974, Celestial Mechanics, 9, 321.Google Scholar
Lyttleton, R. 1974, Astrophysics and Space Science, 27, N 2.Google Scholar
Novye idei v astronomii. Komety, ikh priroda i proiskhozhdenie. 1914, Sint-Petersburg.Google Scholar
Origin of the Solar System. 1972, Nice Symposium, Ed. Reeves, H., CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
Struve, O., and Zebergs, V. 1962, Astronomy of the 20th Century, New York.Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, S. 1972, Vistas in Astronomy, N 13.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1930, Mon. Not. R.A.S., 40, 706.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyastkij, S. K. 1933, Astron. Zh., 10, 29.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1934, Astron. Zh., 11, 68; 437.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1950, Astron. Zh., 27, 16.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1951, Trudy i Soveshchaniya po Voprosam Kosmogonii, Moscow.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1955, Astron. Zh., 32, 432.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1956, Bull. VAGO, N 19, 66.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1962, Astron. Zh., 39, 290.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1962, Publ. Astr. Soc. Pacific, April, 74, 106.Google Scholar
Vsekhavyatskij, S. K. 1967, Priroda i proiskhozhdenie komet i meteorov, Prosveshchenie, Moscow.Google Scholar
Vsekhavyatskij, S. K. 1970, Probl. Kosmich. Fiz., Kiev, N 5, 141.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1971, Probl. Kosmich. Fiz., Kiev, N 6, 73.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1972, Solnechnaya sistema in Probl. Sovrem. Kosm., Ed. Ambartsumyan, V. A., Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1974, Kosmich. Issledov. na Ukraine, Kiev, N 5, 3.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatskij, S. K. 1975, Probl. Kosmich. Fiz., Kiev, N 10, 96.Google Scholar
Woolfson, M. M. 1969, Progr. Phys., 32, 135.Google Scholar