Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:42:30.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1. Orbital Data on the Existence of Oort’s Cloud of Comets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

B. G. Marsden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Oort’s work on the cometary cloud is reviewed and extended using new data from 99 comets with high-quality orbits. These data clearly show the pronounced pile-up of the “original” reciprocals of the semi-major axes at values of less than 0.000100 AU-1. This concentration is found to be even more striking for comets of large perihelion distance, and the possible significance of this is discussed. Lyttleton’s criticisms of the concept of the Oort cloud (or, as only he calls it, “shell”) are reviewed and dismissed as largely irrelevant. A set of data on 96 comets with orbits of second-class quality is also considered.

Type
Part II. The Orbital Evolution of Comets
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 39: Comets, Asteroids, Meteorites: Interrelations, Evolution and Origins , December 1977 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © A.H. Delsemme 1977

References

Brady, J. L. 1970, Astron. J., 75, 1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A.G.W. 1973, Icarus, 18, 407.Google Scholar
Delsemme, A. H. 1974, IAU Colloq No. 22, p. 313.Google Scholar
Everhart, E. 1972, Astrophys. Lett., 10, 131.Google Scholar
Everhart, E., and Raghavan, N. 1970, Astron. J., 75, 258.Google Scholar
Fayet, G. 1966, Ann. Obs. Paris Mem., 26, A.1.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G. 1961, Proc. Fourth Berkeley Syrap. Math. Stat. Probl., 3, 99, 121.Google Scholar
Kuiper, G. P. 1951, in Astrophysics, edited by Hynek, J. A. (McGraw-Hill, New York), p. 457.Google Scholar
LePoole, R. S., and Katgert, P. 1968, Observatory, 88, 164.Google Scholar
Lyttleton, R. A. 1963, in The Nature of Comets, by Richter, N. B. (Methuen, London), p. xvii.Google Scholar
Lyttleton, R. A. 1968, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc., 139, 225.Google Scholar
Lyttleton, R. A. 1974, Astrophys. Space Sci., 31, 385.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G. 1968, Astron. J., 73, 367.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G., and Sekanina, Z. 1973, Astron. J., 78, 1118.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G., Sekanina, Z., and Yeomans, D. K. 1973, Astron. J., 78, 211.Google Scholar
Nezhinskij, E. M. 1972, IAU Symp., No. 45, p. 335.Google Scholar
Oort, J. H. 1950, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 11, 91.Google Scholar
Oort, J. H. 1963, in The Moon, Meteorites and Comets; The Solar System, edited by Middlehurst, B. M. and Kuiper, G. P. (U. Chicago Press, Chicago), vol. 4, p. 665.Google Scholar
Oort, J. H., and Schmidt, M. 1951, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth., 11, 259.Google Scholar
Öpik, E. 1932, Harvard Repr., No. 79.Google Scholar
Russell, H. N. 1920, Astron. J., 33, 49.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1968, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 19, 223.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1976a, Icarus, 27, 123.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1976b, Icarus, (to be published).Google Scholar
Shtejns, K. A. 1961, Astron. Zh., 38, 107.Google Scholar
Stromgren, E. 1914, Publ. Kfibenhavns Obs., No. 19.Google Scholar
van Woerkom, A.J.J. 1948, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth., 10, 445.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1950, Astrophys. J., 111, 375.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1962, Astron. J., 67, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1975, Astron. J., 80, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C. A. 1900, General Astronomy, (Ginn, Boston), revised edition, p. 455.Google Scholar