Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:01:41.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards Culture-Inclusive Criminology in Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2020

Masahiro Suzuki Open the ORCID record for Masahiro Suzuki [Opens in a new window]  and
Chen-Fu Pai Open the ORCID record for Chen-Fu Pai [Opens in a new window]
Masahiro Suzuki*
Affiliation:
Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton, QLD, Australia
Chen-Fu Pai
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, QLD, Australia
*
*Corresponding Author: Masahiro Suzuki, School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Level 2, Building 34, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, QLD4702, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mainstream criminology has been mainly developed in the US and other English-speaking countries. With an expansion of criminology outside the English-speaking world, several scholars have started to cast doubts on the applicability of current mainstream criminology in their regions because it has failed to account for cultural differences. This question has led to a call for an “indigenized” criminology, in which knowledge and discourses are derived from or fixed to align with unique cultural contexts in each region. In this vein, Liu (2009, 2016, 2017a, 2017b) has proposed Asian Criminology. While it has significantly contributed to the development of criminology in Asia, we see two challenges in Liu’s Asian Criminology: lack of consideration for cultural diversity within Asia and its focus on the individualism–collectivism continuum. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach to developing criminology in Asia, which we call culture-inclusive criminology. It builds on a premise that Asia consists of a variety of cultural zones, and therefore calls for a shift from the Euro-American view on culture towards an understanding of culture in its context. Its goal is to develop indigenized criminologies in each cultural zone of Asia under an umbrella of culture-inclusive criminology.

Abstracto

Abstracto

La criminología convencional se ha desarrollado principalmente en los Estados Unidos y otros países de habla inglesa. Con una expansión de la criminología fuera del mundo de habla inglesa, varios académicos han comenzado a poner en duda la aplicabilidad de la criminología convencional actual en sus regiones porque no ha tenido en cuenta las diferencias culturales. Esta pregunta ha llevado a un llamado a una criminología “indígena”, en la cual el conocimiento y los discursos se derivan o fijan para alinearse con contextos culturales únicos en cada región. En este sentido, Liu (2009, 2016, 2017a, 2017b) ha propuesto la Criminología Asiática. Si bien ha contribuido significativamente al desarrollo de la criminología en Asia, vemos dos desafíos en la criminología asiática de Liu: la falta de consideración por la diversidad cultural dentro de Asia y su enfoque en el continuo individualismo-colectivismo. En este documento, proponemos un enfoque alternativo para desarrollar la criminología en Asia, que llamamos criminología que incluye la cultura. Se basa en la premisa de que Asia consiste en una variedad de zonas culturales y, por lo tanto, exige un cambio de la visión euroamericana de la cultura hacia una comprensión de la cultura en su contexto. Su objetivo es desarrollar criminologías indígenas en cada zona cultural de Asia bajo un paraguas de criminología que incluya la cultura.

Abstrait

Abstrait

La criminologie traditionnelle a été principalement développée aux États-Unis et dans d’autres pays anglophones. Avec une expansion de la criminologie en dehors du monde anglophone, plusieurs chercheurs ont commencé à mettre en doute l’applicabilité de la criminologie dominante actuelle dans leurs régions parce qu’elle n’a pas tenu compte des différences culturelles. Cette question a conduit à un appel à une criminologie «indigène», dans laquelle les connaissances et les discours sont dérivés ou fixés pour s’aligner sur des contextes culturels uniques dans chaque région. Dans cette veine, Liu (2009, 2016, 2017a, 2017b) a proposé la criminologie asiatique. Bien qu’elle ait contribué de manière significative au développement de la criminologie en Asie, nous voyons deux défis dans la criminologie asiatique de Liu: le manque de considération pour la diversité culturelle en Asie et sa concentration sur le continuum individualisme-collectivisme. Dans cet article, nous proposons une approche alternative pour développer la criminologie en Asie, que nous appelons la criminologie inclusive de la culture. Elle part du principe que l’Asie se compose d’une variété de zones culturelles, et appelle donc à un changement de la vision euro-américaine de la culture vers une compréhension de la culture dans son contexte. Son objectif est de développer des criminologies indigènes dans chaque zone culturelle de l’Asie sous l’égide de la criminologie inclusive de la culture.

摘要

摘要

主流犯罪学主要是在美国和其他英语国家中发展起来的。随着犯罪学在英语世界之外的扩展，一些学者开始对当前主流犯罪学在他们地区的适用性提出质疑，因为它未能解释文化差异性。这一问题促使人们呼吁建立一种“本土化”的犯罪学。在这种犯罪学中，知识和话语来源于或固定于每个区域的独特文化背景。在这方面，刘(2009;2016;2017a;2017b)提出了亚洲犯罪学。虽然这对亚洲犯罪学的发展做出了重大贡献，但我们看到刘的亚洲犯罪学面临着两个挑战：一是对亚洲文化多样性缺乏考虑，二是对个人主义-集体主义连续体的关注。本文提出了在亚洲发展犯罪学的另一种路径，我们称之为文化包容犯罪学。它建立在亚洲是由多种文化区组成的前提下，因此，呼吁从欧美文化观转向对其背景文化的理解。其目标是在文化包容犯罪学的保护伞下，在亚洲各文化区发展本土化犯罪学。

ملخّص

ملخّص

تم تطوير علم الإجرام السّائد بشكل رئيسي في الولايات المتحدة وغيرها من البلدان الناطقة باللغة الإنجليزية. ومع توسع علم الإجرام خارج نطاق هذه البلدان، بدأ العديد من العلماء يثيرون الشّكوك حول قابليّة تطبيق علم الإجرام الحالي في مناطقهم كونه لم يتمكّن من تفسير الاختلافات الثقافيّة. أدت هذه المسألة إلى دعوة إلى علم إجرام "محلّي" يتم فيه اشتقاق المعرفة والحوار أو إصلاحهما ليتماشيا مع السّياقات الثّقافيّة الخاصّة بكل منطقة. في هذا السياق، اقترح ليو (2009 ؛ 2016 ؛ 2017 أ ؛ 2017 ب) علم الإجرام الآسيوي. وفي حين ساهم هذا الأخير إلى حدٍّ كبير في تطوير علم الإجرام في آسيا، يشهد علم الإجرام الأسيوي الّذي وضعه )ليو( تحدِّيَيْن محتَمَليْن: عدم مراعاة التنوع الثقافي داخل آسيا وتركيز هذا العلم على استمرارية الفردية الجماعية individualism–collectivism continuum. في هذه المقالة ، نقترح نهجًا بديلاً لتطوير علم الإجرام في آسيا، وهو ما نسمّيه بعلم الجريمة الشامل للثقافة culture-inclusive criminology. يقوم هذا البديل على فرضيّة أن آسيا تتكون من مجموعة متنوعة من المناطق الثقافيّة، وبالتالي تدعو إلى تحوّل من الرّؤية الأوروبيّة الأمريكيّة للثقافة إلى فهم الثقافة في سياقها. أمّا هدفه فهو تطوير علم الإجرام المحلّي في كل منطقة ثقافيّة في آسيا تحت مظلة علم الإجرام الشّامل للثقافة.

Keywords

culture-inclusive criminologycriminology in Asiacultural zonesindividualism–collectivism continuumcomparative criminologycriminología que incluye la culturacriminología en Asiazona culturalcolectivismo individualismocriminología comparativacriminologie inclusive de la culturecriminologie en Asiezone culturelleindividualisme, collectivismecriminologie comparé文化包容犯罪学亚洲犯罪学文化区个人主义-集体主义比较犯罪学علم الإجرام الشامل للثقافةعلم الإجرام في آسياالمنطقة الثقافيّةالفرديّة الجماعيّةعلم الإجرام المقارن
Type
Article
Information
International Annals of Criminology , Volume 57 , Issue 1-2 , May 2019 , pp. 8 - 24
Copyright
© 2020 International Society of Criminology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, John G. 1999. “Indigenisation of Psychology: The Concept and Its Practical Implementation.” Applied Psychology 48(4):403–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, Robert. 2015. “Using General Strain Theory to Explain Crime in Asian Societies.” Asian Journal of Criminology 10(2):131–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, Carl M. 2002. “Indigenized Psychologies.” Social Epistemology 16(4):349–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, Carl M. 2011. “On the Foundation of the Indigenous Psychologies.” Social Epistemology 25(1):3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, Carl M. and Berry, John W.. 2006. “Origins and Development of Indigenous Psychologies: An International Analysis.” International Journal of Psychology 41(4):243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1988. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belknap, Joanne. 2016. “Asian Criminology’s Expansion and Advancement of Research and Crime Control Practices.” Asian Journal of Criminology 11(4):249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, Michael H. 2002. “Reclaiming the Individual from Hofstede’s Ecological Analysis–A 20-Year Odyssey: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002).” Psychological Bulletin 128(1):73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2015. “Rethinking Criminology through Radical Diversity in Asian Reconciliation.” Asian Journal of Criminology 10(3):183–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John and Zhang, Yan. 2017. “Persia to China: The Silk Road of Restorative Justice I.” Asian Journal of Criminology 12(1):23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadhurst, Roderic. 2006. “Crime and Security in Asia: Diversity and Development.” Asian Journal of Criminology 1(1):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ira J. 1980. “Toward a Theory of State Intervention: The Nationalization of the British Telegraphs.” Social Science History 4(2):155–205.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ira J. 1989. Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Won K., Karriker-Jaffe, Katherine J., Bond, Jason, and Lui, Camillia. 2015. “Asian American Problem Drinking Trajectories During the Transition to Adulthood: Ethnic Drinking Cultures and Neighborhood Contexts.” American Journal of Public Health 105(5):1020–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunneen, Chris and Tauri, Juan. 2016. Indigenous Criminology. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Emery, Clifton R., Nguyen, Hai Trung, and Kim, Jaeyop. 2014. “Understanding Child Maltreatment in Hanoi: Intimate Partner Violence, Low Self-Control, and Social and Child Care Support.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 29(7):1228–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enriquez, Virgilio G. 1979. “Towards Cross-Cultural Knowledge through Cross-Indigenous Methods and Perspective.” Philippine Journal of Psychology 12(1):9–15.Google Scholar
Farrington, David P., Cohn, Ellen G., and Iratzoqui, Amaia. 2019. “Who Are the Most-Cited Scholars in Asian Criminology Compared with Australia, New Zealand, North America, and Europe?” Asian Journal of Criminology 14(1):61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Alan Page. 2002. “Using Individualism and Collectivism to Compare Cultures–A Critique of the Validity and Measurement of the Constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002).” Psychological Bulletin 128(1):78–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foschi, Martha. 1997. “On Scope Conditions.” Small Group Research 28(4):535–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Alistair. 2013. “Ethnography at the Periphery: Redrawing the Borders of Criminology’s World-Map.” Theoretical Criminology 17(2):251–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathy, Narayanan and Balachandran, Lavanya. 2016. “Crime and Punishment in Asia.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 32(3):196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J. 2015. “Culturally Inclusive Psychology from a Constructionist Standpoint.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45(1):95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghafournia, Nafiseh. 2017. “Muslim Women and Domestic Violence: Developing a Framework for Social Work Practice.” Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought 36(1–2):146–63.Google Scholar
Hebenton, Bill and Jou, Susyan. 2010. “Criminology in and of China: Discipline and Power.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 26(1):7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschi, Travis and Gottfredson, Michael. 1983. “Age and the Explanation of Crime.” American Journal of Sociology 89(3):552–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, David Y. F. 1995. “Selfhood and Identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 25(2):115–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert H. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert H. and Hofstede, Gert Jan. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hue, Ming-Tak. 2007. “The Influence of Classic Chinese Philosophy of Confucianism, Taoism and Legalism on Classroom Discipline in Hong Kong Junior Secondary Schools.” Pastoral Care in Education 25(2):38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. 2000. “Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30(2):155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. 2001. “The Deep Structure of Confucianism: A Social Psychological Approach.” Asian Philosophy 11(3):179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. 2005. “The Third Wave of Cultural Psychology: The Indigenous Movement.” Psychologist 18(2):80–3.Google Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. 2010. “Way to Capture Theory of Indigenous Psychology.” Psychological Studies 55(2):96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. 2015a. “Cultural System vs. Pan-Cultural Dimensions: Philosophical Reflection on Approaches for Indigenous Psychology.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45(1):2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. 2015b. “Culture-Inclusive Theories of Self and Social Interaction: The Approach of Multiple Philosophical Paradigms.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45(1):40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Baker, Wayne E.. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65(1):19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, Md. Jahirul, Suzuki, Masahiro, Mazumder, Nurunnahar, and Ibrahim, Nada. 2018. “Challenges of Implementing Restorative Justice for Intimate Partner Violence: An Islamic Perspective.” Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought 37(3):277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, Gustav. 2016. “On the Rise and Decline of ‘Indigenous Psychology’.” Culture & Psychology 22(2):169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karstedt, Susanne. 2001. “Comparing Cultures, Comparing Crime: Challenges, Prospects and Problems for a Global Criminology.” Crime, Law and Social Change 36(3):285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashima, Yoshihisa, Bain, Paul G., and Perefors, Amy. 2019. “The Psychology of Cultural Dynamics: What Is It, What Do We Know, and What Is Yet to Be Known?” Annual Review of Psychology 70(1):499–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Uichol and Berry, John W.. 1993. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–29 in Indigenous Psychologies: Research and Experience in Cultural Context, edited by Kim, Uichol and Berry, John W.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Kim, Uichol and Park, Young-Shin. 2005. “Integrated Analysis of Indigenous Psychologies: Comments and Extensions of Ideas Presented by Shams, Jackson, Hwang and Kashima.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 8(1):75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Uichol and Park, Young-Shin. 2006. “The Scientific Foundation of Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: The Transactional Approach.” Pp. 27–48 in Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context, edited by Kim, Uichol, Yang, Kuo-Shu, and Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Uichol, Park, Young-Shin, and Park, Donghyun. 1999. “The Korean Indigenous Psychology Approach: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Applications.” Applied Psychology 48(4):451–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Yeon Soo, Ra, Kwang Hyun, and McLean, Kyle. 2019. “The Generalizability of Police Legitimacy: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Speeding Intention of South Korean Drivers.” Asian Journal of Criminology 14(1):41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. [1958] 1963. Structural Anthropology. Translated by Jacobson, C.. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Li, Peter P. 2012. “Toward an Integrative Framework of Indigenous Research: The Geocentric Implications of Yin-Yang Balance.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 29(4):849–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Elaine M., Meng, Juanjuan, and Wang, Joseph Tao-Yi. 2014. “Confucianism and Preferences: Evidence from Lab Experiments in Taiwan and China.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 104:106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, James. 2015. “Globalizing Indigenous Psychology: An East Asian Form of Hierarchical Relationalism with Worldwide Implications: Globalizing Indigenous Psychology.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45(1):82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Jianhong. 2007. “Developing Comparative Criminology and the Case of China: An Introduction.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 51(1):3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Jianhong. 2009. “Asian Criminology – Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions.” Asian Journal of Criminology 4(1):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Jianhong. 2016. “Asian Paradigm Theory and Access to Justice.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 32(3):205–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Jianhong. 2017a. “The Asian Criminological Paradigm and How it Links Global North and South: Combining an Extended Conceptual Toolbox from the North with Innovative Asian Contexts.” International Journal for Crime 6(1):73–87.Google Scholar
Liu, Jianhong. 2017b. “The New Asian Paradigm: A Relational Approach.” Pp. 17–32 in Comparative Criminology in Asia, edited by Liu, Jianhong, Travers, Max, and Chang, Lennon Y. C.. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Jianhong, Hebenton, Bill, and Jou, Susyan. 2013. “Progress of Asian Criminology: Editors’ Introduction.” Pp. 1–9 in Handbook of Asian Criminology, edited by Liu, Jianhong, Hebenton, Bill, and Jou, Susyan. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Liu, Jianhong and Miyazawa, Setsuo. 2018. “Asian Criminology and Crime and Justice in Japan: An Introduction.” Pp. 1–9 in Crime and Justice in Contemporary Japan, edited by Liu, Jianhong and Miyazawa, Setsuo. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Jianhong, Travers, Max, and Chang, Lennon Y. C.. 2017a. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–10 in Comparative Criminology in Asia, edited by Liu, Jianhong, Travers, Max, and Chang, Lennon Y. C.. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Jianhong, Travers, Max, and Chang, Lennon Y. C.. 2017b. “Reflecting on Comparison: A View from Asia.” Pp. 185–201 in Comparative Criminology in Asia, edited by Liu, Jianhong, Travers, Max, and Chang, Lennon Y. C.. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Jianhong, Travers, Max, and Chang, Lennon Y. C.. 2017c. “Why Compare? Asian Countries, the West and Comparative Criminology: Introduction to Part I.” Pp. 11–15 in Comparative Criminology in Asia, edited by Liu, Jianhong, Travers, Max, and Chang, Lennon Y. C.. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Eugene and Newburn, Tim (editors). (2010). The Sage Handbook of Criminological Theory. London, UK: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Messner, Steven F. 2015. “When West Meets East: Generalizing Theory and Expanding the Conceptual Toolkit of Criminology.” Asian Journal of Criminology 10(2):117–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moosavi, Leon. 2018a. “A Friendly Critique of ‘Asian Criminology’ and ‘Southern Criminology’.” British Journal of Criminology 59(2):257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moosavi, Leon. 2018b. “Decolonising Criminology: Syed Hussein Alatas on Crimes of the Powerful.” Critical Criminology 27(2):229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngai, Ngan-Pun and Cheung, Chau-Kiu. 2005. “Predictors of the Likelihood of Delinquency: A Study of Marginal Youth in Hong Kong, China.” Youth & Society 36(4):445–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogihara, Yuji. 2018. “The Rise in Individualism in Japan: Temporal Changes in Family Structure, 1947–2015.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 49(8):1219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, Daphna, Coon, Heather M., and Kemmelmeier, Markus. 2002. “Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analyses.” Psychological Bulletin 128(1):3–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ronel, Natti and Yair, Y. Ben. 2018. “Spiritual Criminology: The Case of Jewish Criminology.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 62(7):2081–2102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, Shalom H. 1990. “Individualism-Collectivism: Critique and Proposed Refinements.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21(2):139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. 2004. “Mapping and Interpreting Cultural Differences around the World.” Pp. 43–73 in Comparing Cultures: Dimensions of Culture in a Comparative Perspective, edited by Vinken, Henk, Soeters, Joseph, and Ester, Peter. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Singelis, Theodore M., Triandis, Harry C., Bhawuk, Dharm P. S., and Gelfand, Michele J.. 1995. “Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement.” Cross-Cultural Research 29(3):240–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffensmeier, Darrell, Zhong, Hua, and Lu, Yunmei. 2017. “Age and Its Relation to Crime in Taiwan and the United States: Invariant, or Does Cultural Context Matter?” Criminology 55(2):377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffensmeier, Darrell, Lu, Yunmei, and Kumar, Sumit. 2019. “Age–Crime Relation in India: Similarity or Divergence vs. Hirschi/Gottfredson Inverted J-Shaped Projection?” British Journal of Criminology 59(1):144–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffensmeier, Darrell, Lu, Yunmei, and Na, Chongmin. 2020. “Age and Crime in South Korea: Cross-National Challenge to Invariance Thesis.” Justice Quarterly 37(3):410–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Ivan Y., Wu, Yuning, Hu, Rong, and Farmer, Ashley K.. 2017. “Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Public Cooperation with Police: Does Western Wisdom Hold in China?” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 54(4):454–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundararajan, Louise. 2015. “Indigenous Psychology: Grounding Science in Culture, Why and How?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45(1):64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Masahiro, Pai, Chen-Fu, and Islam, Md. Jahirul. 2018. “Systematic Quantitative Literature Review on Criminological Theories in Asia.” Asian Journal of Criminology 3(2):129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takano, Yohtaro and Osaka, Eiko. 1999. “An Unsupported Common View: Comparing Japan and the U.S. On Individualism/Collectivism.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2(3):311–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takano, Yohtaro and Osaka, Eiko. 2018. “Comparing Japan and the United States on Individualism/Collectivism: A Follow-up Review.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 21(4):301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takano, Yohtaro and Sogon, Shunya. 2008. “Are Japanese More Collectivistic than Americans?: Examining Conformity in in-Groups and the Reference-Group Effect.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 39(3):237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taras, Vas, Sarala, Riikka, Muchinsky, Paul, Kemmelmeier, Markus, Singelis, Theodore M., Avsec, Andreja, Coon, Heather M., Dinnel, Dale L., Gardner, Wendi, Grace, Sherry, Hardin, Erin E., Hsu, Sandy, Johnson, Joel, Karakitapoğlu, A. Zahide, Kashima, Emiko S., Kolstad, Arnulf, Milfont, Taciano L., Oetzel, John, Okazaki, Sumie, Probst, Tahira M., Sato, Toru, Shafiro, Maggie, Schwartz, Seth J., and Sinclair, H. Colleen. 2014. “Opposite Ends of the Same Stick? Multi-Method Test of the Dimensionality of Individualism and Collectivism.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 45(2):213–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, Harry C. 1995. Individualism & Collectivism: New Directions in Social Psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Triandis, Harry C. 2000. “Dialectics between Cultural and Cross-Cultural Psychology.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 3(3):185–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsushima, Masahiro and Hamai, Koichi. 2015. “Public Cooperation with the Police in Japan: Testing the Legitimacy Model.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 31(2):212–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vignoles, Vivian L., Owe, Ellinor, Becker, Maja, Smith, Peter B., Easterbrook, Matthew J., Brown, Rupert, González, Roberto, Didier, Nicolas, Carrasco, Diego, Cadena, Maria Paz, Siugmin, Lay, Schwartz, Seth J., Des Rosiers, Sabrina E., Villamar, Juan A., Gavreliuc, Alin, Zinkeng, Martina, Kreuzbauer, Robert, Baguma, Peter, Martin, Mariana, Tatarko, Alexander, Herman, Ginette, de Sauvage, Isabelle, Courtois, Marie, Gardarsdóttir, Ragna B., Harb, Charles, Gallo, Inge Schweiger, Gil, Paula Prieto, Clemares, Raquel Lorente, Campara, Gabriella, Nizharadze, George, Macapagal, Ma Elizabeth J., Jalal, Baland, Bourguignon, David, Zhang, Jianxin, Lv, Shaobo, Chybicka, Aneta, Yuki, Masaki, Zhang, Xiao, Espinosa, Agustín, Valk, Aune, Abuhamdeh, Sami, Amponsah, Benjamin, Özgen, Emre, Guner, E. Ülkü, Yamakoglu, Nil, Chobthamkit, Phatthanakit, Pyszczynski, Tom, Kesebir, Pelin, Trujillo, Elvia Vargas, Balanta, Paola, Ayala, Boris Cendales, Silvia H.Koller, , Jas LaileJaafar, , Gausel, Nicolay, Fischer, Ronald, Milfont, Taciano L., Kusdil, Ersin, Çağlar, Selinay, Aldhafri, Said, Ferreira, M. Cristina, Habtamu, KassahunMekonnen, , Wang, Qian, Fülöp, Márta, Torres, Ana, Camino, Leoncio, Lemos, Flavia Cristina Silveira, Fritsche, Immo, Möller, Bettina, Regalia, Camillo, Manzi, Claudia, Brambilla, Maria, and Bond, Michael Harris. 2016. “Beyond the ‘East–West’ Dichotomy: Global Variation in Cultural Models of Selfhood.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 145(8):966–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, Beth. 2019. “Understanding Desistance: A Critical Review of Theories of Desistance.” Psychology, Crime & Law 25(6):641–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Qiang and Cheung, Sai On. 2016. “Influence of Confucianism and Taoism on Construction Dispute Handling Behaviors in China.” Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 8(1):C4515002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Jung-Soo. 2018. “Revisiting Individualism-Collectivism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison among College Students in Four Countries.” Journal of Intercultural Communication issue 47.Google Scholar
Yun, Ilhong and Lee, Julak. 2017. “The Relationship between Religiosity and Deviance among Adolescents in a Religiously Pluralistic Society.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 61(15):1739–59.Google Scholar
Zhai, Fuhua and Gao, Qin. 2009. “Child Maltreatment among Asian Americans: Characteristics and Explanatory Framework.” Child Maltreatment 14(2):207–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar