Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:00:43.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crime Mapping and Crime Analysis of Property Crimes in Jodhpur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2018

Swikar Lama*
Affiliation:
Sardar Patel University of Police, Security and Criminal Justice, Jodhpur, India
Sikandar Singh Rathore
Affiliation:
Sardar Patel University of Police, Security and Criminal Justice, Jodhpur, India
*
*Corresponding Author: Swikar Lama, Sardar Patel University of Police, Security and Criminal Justice, Opp. Rural Police Line, Osian Road, Daijer, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342304, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This study is based on crime mapping and crime analysis of property crimes in Jodhpur. The property crimes which were selected were house breaking, auto thefts and chain snatching. Data from police stations were used to generate the maps to locate hot spots of crimes. The profile of these hot spots was analyzed through observations supplemented with interviews of police officers and public 100 cases of house breaking and 100 cases of auto thefts were further analyzed to understand the contexts which lead to these crimes. These contexts are in consonance with situational crime prevention theories. This study may help to understand the environmental factors which may be responsible for certain places becoming hot spot areas of property crimes in Jodhpur.

Sinopsis

Este estudio se basa en el mapeo de crímenes y el análisis de delitos contra la propiedad en Jodhpur. Los delitos contra la propiedad que se seleccionaron fueron la rotura de viviendas, los robos de automóviles y el secuestro de cadenas. Los datos de las estaciones de policía se utilizaron para generar los mapas para ubicar puntos calientes de crímenes. El perfil de estos puntos calientes se analizó a través de observaciones complementadas con entrevistas a oficiales de policía y público. Se analizaron más a fondo 100 casos de desalojo domiciliario y 100 casos de robos de automóviles para comprender los contextos que conducen a estos crímenes. Estos contextos están en consonancia con las teorías situacionales de prevención del delito. Este estudio puede ayudar a comprender los factores ambientales que pueden ser responsables de que ciertos lugares se conviertan en zonas de crímenes contra la propiedad en Jodhpur.

Résumé

Cette étude est basée sur la cartographie de la criminalité et l’analyse criminelle des délits contre les personnes à Jodhpur. Les délits qui ont été retenus étaient les cambriolages de maison, les vols d’automobiles et les vols à la chaîne. Les données des commissariats de police ont été utilisées pour générer les cartes afin de localiser les endroits les plus touchés par ces délits. Le profil de chaque lieu a été analysé au moyen d’observations complétées par des entrevues avec des agents de police et des représentants du public. 100 cas de cambriolage et 100 cas de vols d’automobiles ont été analysés afin de comprendre les contextes qui ont mené à ces crimes. Ces contextes concordent avec les théories de la prévention du crime situationnel. Cette étude peut aider à comprendre les facteurs environnementaux qui peuvent être responsables de la transformation de certains endroits devenant des zones sensibles de délits à Jodhpur.

关键词

這項研究是基於焦特布爾的犯罪分析和財產犯罪的犯罪分析。 被選中的財產犯罪分別是破產,汽車盜竊和連環搶劫。 派出所的數據被用來生成地圖,以確定犯罪熱點。 通過對警務人員和公眾的訪談和訪談,對這些熱點進行了剖析。對100起破房案和100起汽車盜竊事件進行了進一步分析,以了解導致這些犯罪的背景。 這些背景與情境犯罪預防理論是一致的。 這項研究可能有助於了解可能對某些地方成為焦特布爾財產犯罪熱點地區負責的環境因素。

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2018 International Society of Criminology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, Stephen, Husain, Sohail Storey, Angele. 1991. The Influence of Street Lighting on Crime and Fear of Crime. Crime Prevention Unit Paper no. 28. London: Home Office Crime Prevention Unit.Google Scholar
Barclay, Paul, Buckley, Jennifer, Brantingham, Paul J., Brantingham, Patricia L. Whinn-Yates, Terry. 1996. “Preventing Auto Theft in Suburban Vancouver Commuter Lots: Effects of a Bike Patrol.” Pp. 131161 in Crime Prevention Studies Vol. 6, Preventing Mass Transit Crime, edited by Ronald V. Clarke. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Trevor H. Gelsthorpe, Loraine. 1996. “Public Attitudes Towards CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) in Public Places.” Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention 5(1):7290.Google Scholar
Bernasco, Wim. 2006. “Co-Offending and the Choice of Target Areas in Burglary.” Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 3:139155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, Anthony A. 2005. “Hot Spots Policing and Crime Prevention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 1(3):317342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, Patricia L. Brantingham, Paul J.. 1982. “Mobility, Notoriety and Crime: A Study of Crime Patterns in Urban Nodal Points.” Journal of Environmental Systems 11(1):8999.Google Scholar
Brown, B. B. Altman, I.. 1982. “Territoriality and Residential Crime: A Conceptual Framework.” Pp. 5576 in Environmental Criminology, edited by P. J. Brantingham and P. L. Brantingham. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Clarke, Ronald V. Mayhew, Pat. 1994. “Parking Patterns and Car Theft Risks: Policy-Relevant Findings from the British Crime Survey.” Pp. 91108 in Crime Prevention Studies Vol. 3, edited by Ronald V. Clarke. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Lawrence E. Cantor, David. 1981. “Residential Burglary in the United States: Life-Style and Demographic Factors Associated With the Probability of Victimization.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 18(1):113127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Tella, Rafael Schargrodsky, Ernesto. 2004. “Do Police Reduce Crime? Estimates using the Allocation of Police Forces after a Terrorist Attack.” The American Economic Review 94(1):115133.Google Scholar
Ditton, Jason Short, Emma. 1999. “Yes, it Works, No, it Doesn’t: Comparing the Effects of Open-Street CCTV in Two Adjacent Scottish Town Centres.” Pp. 201223 in Crime Prevention Studies Vol. 10, Surveillance of Public Space: CCTV, Street Lighting and Crime Prevention, edited by K. Painter and N. Tilley. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. Weisburd, D.. 1995. Crime Prevention Studies Vol. 4, Crime and Place Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Hannan, Timothy H. 1982. “Bank Robberies and Bank Security Precautions.” Journal of Legal Studies 11(1):8392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, L. M. Bryan, B. A.. 2000. “Visualising the Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Motor Vehicle Theft in Adelaide, South Australia.” Paper presented at the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference on Crime Mapping: Adding Value to Crime Prevention and Control, Adelaide, Australia, September 2000.Google Scholar
Hollinger, Richard C. Dabney, Dean A.. 1999. “Motor Vehicle Theft at the Shopping Centre: An Application of the Routine Activities Approach.” Security Journal 12(1):6378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Shane D. Bowers, Kate J.. 2004. “The Burglary as Clue to the Future: The Beginnings of Prospective Hot-Spotting.” European Journal of Criminology 1(2):237255.Google Scholar
Levy, Marissa P. Tartaro, Christine. 2010. “Repeat Victimization: A Study of Auto Theft in Atlantic City Using the WALLS Variables to Measure Environmental Indicators.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 21(3):296318.Google Scholar
Marzbali, Hedayati M., Abdullah, Aldrin, Razak, Nordin A. Tilaki, Mohammad J. M.. 2012. “The Influence of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design on Victimisation and Fear of Crime.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 32(2):7988.Google Scholar
Mazeika, David M. Kumar, Sumit. 2017. “Do Crime Hot Spots Exist in Developing Countries? Evidence from India.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 33(1):4561.Google Scholar
Painter, Kate. 1996. “The Influence of Street Lighting Improvements on Crime, Fear and Pedestrian Street Use, After Dark.” Landscape and Urban Planning 35(2):193201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Douglas D., Wandersman, Abraham, Rich, Richard C. Taylor, Ralph B.. 1993. “The Physical Environment of Street Crime: Defensible Space, Territoriality and Incivilities.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 13(1):2949.Google Scholar
Poyner, Barry. 1993. “What Works in Crime Prevention: An Overview of Evaluations.” Pp. 734 in Crime Prevention Studies Vol. 1, edited by Ronald V. Clarke. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Andrew A. Andresen, Martin A.. 2014. “An Evaluation of CCTV in a Car Park Using Police and Insurance Data.” Security Journal 27(1):5579.Google Scholar
Tilley, Nick. 1993. Understanding Car Parks, Crime, and CCTV: Evaluation Lessons from Safer Cities. London: Home Office Police Department.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David L. McEwen, Tom. 2015. “Introduction: Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention.” Retrieved July 12, 2015 (https://ssrn.com/abstract=2629850) (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2629850).Google Scholar
Weisel, Deborah Lamm. 2002. “Burglary of Single-Family Houses.” Guide No. 18. Center for Problem-Oriented Policing. Retrieved January 17, 2018 (http://www.popcenter.org/problems/burglary_home/print/).Google Scholar
Welsh, Brandon C. Farrington, David P.. 2004. “Evidence-Based Crime Prevention: The Effectiveness of CCTV.” Crime Prevention and Community Safety 6(2):2133.Google Scholar
Welsh, Brandon C. Farrington, David P.. 2009. “Public Area CCTV and Crime Prevention: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Justice Quarterly 26(4):716745.Google Scholar