Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:16:55.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drug Trafficking in the Mainland Southeast Asian Region: The Example of Vietnam’s Shared Borderland with Laos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2020

Hai Thanh Luong Open the ORCID record for Hai Thanh Luong [Opens in a new window]
Hai Thanh Luong*
Affiliation:
RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
*
*Corresponding Author. Hai Thanh Luong, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, 411 Swanston Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, transit routes in Vietnam for drug trafficking networks in the Southeast Asia region and beyond have expanded considerably. Many international scholars are working on identifying destination and transit routes of drug trafficking entities “to and through” Vietnam. Among these routes, the crossings through the Vietnam–Laos borderland of about 2,340 km are among the most severe concerns. This article analyses supply-and-demand scales of illicit drugs in Vietnam from 2008 to 2017 within the context of illegal drug trafficking in the mainland Southeast Asian region. Some evidence consistent with the “destination and transit route” arguments were found through mapping three main ways across the Vietnam–Laos borderland. The article also calls for enhancing the bilateral cooperation among law enforcement agencies to prevent and combat drug trafficking from the two sides.

Abstracto

Abstracto

En los últimos años, las rutas de tránsito en Vietnam para las redes de narcotráfico en la región del sudeste asiático y más allá se han expandido considerablemente. Muchos académicos internacionales están trabajando para identificar las rutas de destino y tránsito de las entidades de narcotráfico ‘hacia y a través de’ Vietnam. Entre estas rutas, los cruces a través de la frontera entre Vietnam y Laos de unos 2.340 kilómetros se encuentran entre las preocupaciones más graves. Este artículo analiza las escalas de oferta y demanda de drogas ilícitas en Vietnam entre 2008 y 2017 en el contexto del tráfico ilegal de drogas en la región del sudeste asiático continental. Se encontraron algunas pruebas consistentes con los argumentos de “ruta de destino y tránsito” a través del mapeo de tres formas principales de cruzar la frontera de Vietnam y Laos. El artículo también llama a mejorar la cooperación bilateral entre las agencias de aplicación de la ley para prevenir y combatir el narcotráfico desde ambos lados.

Abstrait

Abstrait

Ces dernières années, les itinéraires de transit au Vietnam pour les réseaux de trafic de drogue dans la région de l’Asie du Sud-Est et au-delà se sont considérablement développés. De nombreux chercheurs internationaux travaillent à l’identification des destinations et des itinéraires de transit des entités de trafic de drogue «vers et à travers» le Vietnam. Parmi ces itinéraires, les traversées de la frontière Vietnam-Laos d’environ 2340 kilomètres font partie des préoccupations les plus graves. Cet article analyse les échelles de l’offre et de la demande de drogues illicites au Vietnam de 2008 à 2017 dans le contexte du trafic de drogues illicites dans la région de l’Asie du Sud-Est continentale. Certaines preuves cohérentes avec les arguments de «destination et itinéraire de transit» ont été trouvées en cartographiant trois voies principales à travers la frontière entre le Vietnam et le Laos. L’article appelle également au renforcement de la coopération bilatérale entre les forces de l’ordre pour prévenir et combattre le trafic de drogue des deux côtés.

抽象

抽象

近年来，越南在东南亚地区及其他地区贩毒网络的过境路线已大大扩展。 许多国际学者正在努力确定毒品贩运实体“进出越南”的目的地和过境路线。 在这些路线中，最严重的问题是穿越越南-老挝边境约2340公里。 本文分析了在东南亚大陆地区非法贩运毒品的背景下，2008年至2017年越南非法毒品的供求规模。 通过绘制越老边境的三种主要方式，发现了一些与“目的地和中转路线”论点相符的证据。 文章还呼吁加强执法机构之间的双边合作，以防止和打击双方的毒品贩运。

نبذة مختصرة

نبذة مختصرة

في السنوات الأخيرة ، توسعت طرق العبور في فيتنام لشبكات الاتجار بالمخدرات في منطقة جنوب شرق آسيا وخارجها بشكل كبير. يعمل العديد من الباحثين الدوليين على تحديد طرق المقصد والعبور لهيئات تهريب المخدرات من وإلى “فيتنام”. ومن بين هذه الطرق ، تعد المعابر عبر حدود فيتنام ولاوس الحدودية التي يبلغ طولها 2340 كيلومترًا من بين المخاوف الأكثر خطورة. يحلل هذا المقال جداول العرض والطلب للمخدرات غير المشروعة في فيتنام من عام 2008 إلى عام 2017 في سياق الاتجار غير المشروع بالمخدرات في منطقة جنوب شرق آسيا القارية. تم العثور على بعض الأدلة التي تتوافق مع حجج “الوجهة والمرور” من خلال رسم خرائط لثلاث طرق رئيسية عبر حدود فيتنام ولاوس الحدودية. كما تدعو المقالة إلى تعزيز التعاون الثنائي بين وكالات إنفاذ القانون لمنع ومكافحة الاتجار بالمخدرات من الجانبين.

Keywords

transnational narcotics traffickingmapping routespolicingLaosVietnamnarcotráfico transnacionalruta cartográficavigilancia policialLaosVietnamtrafic transnational de stupéfiantscartographie des itinérairesmaintien de l’ordreLaosVietnam跨国麻醉品贩运测绘路线警务老挝越南الكلمات الرئيسية الاتجار بالمخدرات عبر الحدود الوطنيةطريق رسم الخرائطالشرطةلاوس
Type
Article
Information
International Annals of Criminology , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , May 2020 , pp. 130 - 151
Copyright
© 2020 International Society of Criminology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anh, D. D. 1933. Viet Nam Van Hoa Su Cuong (Vietnam: History and Culture). Hanoi, Vietnam: The World’s Publishing.Google Scholar
ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA). 2014. “Country Progress Report of Vietnam.” Paper Presented at the 11th Meeting of the AIPA Fact-Finding Committee (AIFOCOM), Vientiane, Lao PDR: ASEAN’s Publishing.Google Scholar
ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA). 2018. Viet Nam Country Report. Singapore: ASEAN’s Publishing.Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank. 2010. Strategy and Action Plan for the Greater Mekong Subregion East–West Economic Corridor. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). 2017. The ASEAN Work Plan on Securing Communities Against Illicit Drugs 2016–2025. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN’s Publishing.Google Scholar
Association of Southeast Asian Nations Narcotics Cooperation Center (ASEAN-NARCO). 2017. “ASEAN Drug Monitoring Report, 2016.” Bangkok, Thailand: ASEAN’s Publishing.Google Scholar
Australian Government. 2018. “Vietnam Country Brief.” Retrieved February 28, 2018 (https://dfat.gov.au/geo/vietnam/Pages/vietnam-country-brief.aspx).Google Scholar
Bach, Xuan Tran, Boggiano, Victoria L., Nguyen, Huong Lan Thi, Nguyen, Long Hoang, Van Nguyen, Hung, Hoang, Canh Dinh, Le, Huong Thi, Tran, Tho Dinh, Le, Hai Quan, Latkin, Carl A., Vu, Thuc Minh Thi, Zhang, Melvyn Wb, and Ho, Roger Cm. 2018. “Concurrent Drug Use Among Methadone Maintenance Patients in Mountainous Areas in Northern Vietnam.” BMJ Open 8(3):e015875.Google Scholar
Battersby, P. 2014. “Global Crime and Global Security.” Pp. 697–719 in The SAGE Handbook of Globalization, Vol. 2, edited by Steger, M., Battersby, P., and Siracusa, J.. London: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Binh, T. N. 2017. “Enhancing International Cooperation to Anti-Narcotics and Drug-Related Crimes Across Borderland Between Vietnam and Laos.” Police Magazine 12(96):5–6 (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Blickman, T. 2009. “The ATS Boom in Southeast Asia.” Pp. 52–69 in Withdrawal Symptoms in the Golden Triangle: A Drug Market in Disarray, edited by Kramer, T., Jelsma, M., and Blickman, T.. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Chin, K.-L. and Zhang, S.. 2015. The Chinese Heroin Trade: Cross-Border Drug Trafficking in Southeast Asia and Beyond. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chouvy, P.-A. 2002. “New Drug Trafficking Routes in Southeast Asia.” Jane’s Intelligence Review 14(7):32–4.Google Scholar
Chouvy, P.-A. 2013a. “Drug Trafficking in and out of the Golden Triangle.” Pp. 29–53 in An Atlas of Trafficking in Southeast Asia: The Illegal Trade in Arms, Drugs, People, Counterfeit Goods, and Natural Resources in Mainland Southeast Asia, edited by Chouvy, P.-A.. London: I. B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chouvy, P.-A. 2013b. “Introduction: Illegal Trades Across National Borders.” Pp. 1–52 in An Atlas of Trafficking in Southeast Asia: The Illegal Trade in Arms, Drugs, People, Counterfeit Goods, and Natural Resources in Mainland Southeast Asia, edited by Chouvy, P.-A.. London: I. B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Công an Nghê An. 2013. Annual Meeting on Bilateral Cooperation on Preventing and Combating Drugs Across Borders Between Vietnam and Laos, XIIIth, Nghean, Vietnam. Vinh, Vietnam: Steering Organization on Prevention and Combat Drugs Eight Provinces of Vietnam and Laos (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Douglas, J. 2017. “How Can China Help Address Transnational Crime in Asia?” East Asia Forum. Retrieved September 18, 2020 (https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/09/26/88441/).Google Scholar
Doumer, P. 1903. Xứ Đông Dương (Indo-China Franchise). Hanoi, Vietnam: Nhà xuất bản Thế giới và Nhà sách Alpha (The World Publishing House and Alpha Books).Google Scholar
Friedman, T. 1990. From Beirut to Jerusalem. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Giang, M. L., Ngoc, B. L., Hoang, H. V., Mulvey, K., and Rawson, R.. 2013. “Substance Use Disorders and HIV in Vietnam Since Doi Moi (Renovation): An Overview.” Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 21(4):S42–S45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Government of Vietnam. 2018. Vietnam’s Voluntary National Review on the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Hanoi, Vietnam: Department for Science, Education, Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of Planning and Investment.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. 2006. “A Shot in the Arm: Transboundary Flows and Opiate Transition in Vietnam.” Pp. 59–64 in Illicit Drugs and Development: Critical Issues for Asia and the Pacific, edited by Thomas, P.. Canberra, Australia: Development Studies Network.Google Scholar
Hieu, L. 2013. Drug Trafficking Across the Vietnam and Laos Borders. Vinh, Vietnam.Google Scholar
Hieu, T. T. 2012. “Phá án ma túy trên đất Lào – Kỳ 4: Xiêng Phênh tái xuất giang hồ.” (“Drug Case in Laos – Part 4: Xieng Phenh Re-exported to the Lake”). Thanh Nien News, December 13, 2012. Retrieved September 18, 2020 (https://thanhnien.vn/thoi-su/phong-su-dieu-tra/pha-an-ma-tuy-tren-dat-lao-ky-4-xieng-phenh-tai-xuat-giang-ho-46126.html).Google Scholar
Hoa, P. T. N. 2008. “Legislative Implementation by Vietnam of its Obligations Under the United Nations Drug Control Conventions.” PhD Dissertation, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.Google Scholar
Hoà, T. 2018. “Cuộc chiến khốc liệt ở “thủ phủ ma túy” Lóng Luông (kỳ 1).” (“Fierce Fighting on ‘Central Drugs’ Long Luong (Part One)”). Công, an Thanh pho Ho Chi Minh, June 30, 2018. Retrieved September 18, 2020 (http://congan.com.vn/vu-an/phong-su/cuoc-chien-khoc-liet-o-thu-phu-ma-tuy-long-luong-ky-1_57951.html).Google Scholar
Hoa, V. D. 1996. “Xac dinh mo hinh co cau cay trong thich hop tren dat doc Vung Cao mien NUI phia bac GOP phan bo sung CAC Giai phap, Cho Chuong Trinh, that the cay thuoc phien.” (“Finding a Suitable Cultivation Structure for Northern Mountainous and Uplands Areas as a Contribution to the Opium Poppy Alternatives Program”). PhD Dissertation, Technical Agriculture Institution, Hanoi, Vietnam.Google Scholar
Hoang, V. L. T. 2007. “Vietnam’s Quest for Influence and Its Implications for the Management of Border Disputes with Laos and Cambodia.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 26(2):6–38.Google Scholar
Huyen, V. N. 1944. Van Minh Viet Nam (Vietnam’s Civilization). Hanoi, Vietnam: Nha Nam Publishers.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2019. Fire and Ice: Conflict and Drugs in Myanmar’s Shan State. Asia Report no. 299. Brussels, Belgium: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
International Narcotics Control Board. 2006. Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2005. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR). 2011. 2011 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC: United States Department of State, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.Google Scholar
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR). 2013. 2013 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC: United States Department of State, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.Google Scholar
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR). 2016. 2016 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC: United States Department of State, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.Google Scholar
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR). 2018. 2018 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC: United States Department of State, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.Google Scholar
Kramer, T., Jelsma, M., and Blickman, T.. 2009. Withdrawal Symptoms in the Golden Triangle: A Drugs Market in Disarray. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Kramer, T., Jensema, E., Jelsma, M., and Blickman, T.. 2014. Bouncing Back: Relapse in the Golden Triangle. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Linh, T. 2018. “Tinh hinh, ket qua Cong tac Phong Nga, dau tranh voi toi Pham va te nan ve ma tuy tren Tuyen bien gioi tinh Thanh Hoa va mot so kien nghi, de xuat.” Nghien cuu-Trao doi, October 2018. Retrieved September 21, 2020 (http://csnd.vn/Home/Nghien-cuu-Trao-doi/5578/Tinh-hinh-ket-qua-cong-tac-phong-ngua-dau-tranh-voi-toi-pham-va-te-nan-ve-ma-tuy-tren-tuyen-bien-gioi-tinh-Thanh-Hoa-va-mot-so-kien-nghi-de-xuat).Google Scholar
Lintner, B. 2008. “Laos: At the Crossroads.” Southeast Asian Affairs 2008:171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loc, D. D. 2017. “Solutions to Improve the Effectiveness of Combat Drug-Related Crimes in New Situations.” Police Magazine 12(96):7–11 (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Luong, Hai Thanh. 2017. “Drug Trafficking Trends and Its Responses: A Case Study of Vietnam.” Pp. 201–19 in Cybercrime, Organized Crime, and Societal Responses: International Approaches, edited by Viano, Emilio C.. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, Hai Thanh. 2019a. Transnational Drug Trafficking Across the Vietnam–Laos Border. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, Hai Thanh. 2019b. “Vietnam and the Mekong’s Synthetic Drug Epidemic.” Retrieved May 6, 2019 (https://thediplomat.com/2019/05/vietnam-and-the-mekongs-synthetic-drug-epidemic/).Google Scholar
Mahathir, M. 2013. “Foreword.” Pp. vii–viii in Drug Law Reform in East and Southeast Asia, edited by Rahman, F. and Crofts, N.. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
McCoy, A. 1972. The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
McCoy, A. 2003. The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade: Afghanistan, Southeast Asia, Central America, Colombia, 2nd Revised Edition. Chicago, IL: Lawrence Hill Books.Google Scholar
Michaud, J. 2000. “The Montagnards and the State in Northern Vietnam from 1802 to 1975: A Historical Overview.” Ethnohistory 47(2):333–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minh, T. and Tuan, D.. 2013. “Hành lang ma túy đường 8A: Kỳ án ‘ước mơ đuổi gà’ nặng 39 bánh heroin.” (“Drug Routes 8A: Operation ‘Dream to Chicken’s Arrest’ Weighted 39 Blocks of Heroin”). VietnamNet, May 29, 2013. Retrieved September 18, 2020 (http://vietnamnet.vn/vn/tuanvietnam/ky-an-uoc-mo-duoi-ga-nang-39-banh-heroin-123070.html).Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD). 2016. Annual Report on Regrowing Opium Poppy in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: MARD (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Ministry of Industry and Trade. 2018. “Giới thiệu về Hành lang kinh tế Đông Tây.” [“Introduction on the East–West Economic Corridor – EWEC (Press Release)”). Retrieved September 18, 2020 (http://www.moit.gov.vn/CmsView-EcoIT-portlet/html/print_cms.jsp?articleId=11104).Google Scholar
Ministry of Labour, War Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA). 2018. Annual Report on Drug Control and Monitor in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: MOLISA.Google Scholar
Ministry of Public Security (MPS). 2012. Annual Report for Drug Situation in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Public Security (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Ministry of Public Security (MPS). 2017. Annual Report for Drug Situation in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Public Security (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Ministry of Public Security (MPS). 2018. Annual Report for Drug Situation in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Public Security (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Ministry of Public Security of China. 2014. Annual Report on Drug Control in China 2005–2013. Beijing, China: Ministry of Public Security of China.Google Scholar
National Border Committee. 2010. The Borderland between Vietnam and Laos. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
National Border Committee. 2011. “Overview of Borderland Between Vietnam and Laos.” In Vietnam’s Sovereign Boundaries. Retrieved December 11, 2013 (http://123.30.50.199/sites/vi/tongquanchungveduongbien-gid-19430525-nd-f8444a7e.aspx).Google Scholar
Oanh, T. H. K. 2007. HIV/AIDS Policy in Vietnam: A Civil Society Perspective. New York: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
Rapin, A.-J. 2003. Ethnic Minorities, Drug Use and Harm in the Highlands of Northern Vietnam: A Contextual Analysis of the Situation in Six Communes from Son La, Lai Chau, and Lao Cai. Hanoi, Vietnam: Thegioi Publishing.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., and Davis, D. H.. 1975. “Narcotic Use in Southeast Asia and Afterward: An Interview Study of 898 Vietnam Returnees.” Archives of General Psychiatry 32(8):955–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Routray, B. 2018. “Narco Economy in Myanmar: From Opiates to ATS.” ISPSW Strategy Series: Focus on Defense and International Security no. 552. Berlin: Institut für Strategie- Politik- Sicherheits- und Wirtschaftsberatung (ISPSW).Google Scholar
Shelley, L. 2006. “Border Issues: Transnational Crime and Terrorism.” Pp. 255–69 in Borders and Security Governance: Managing Borders in a Globalised World, edited by Caparini, M. and Marenin, O.. Zurich, Switzerland: Lit Levlag.Google Scholar
Silva, J. 2016. “Taking on the Golden Triangle’s Narco-Empire.” Reuters, March 15, 2016. Retrieved September 21, 2020 (https://widerimage.reuters.com/story/taking-on-the-golden-triangles-narco-empire).Google Scholar
Standing Office on Drugs and Crime (SODC). 2013. Vietnam National Report. Paper Presented at the Twenty-third Anti-Drug Liaison Officials’ Meeting for International Cooperation (ADLOMICO), Busan, Republic of Korea. UNODC’s Vietnam.Google Scholar
Stanton, M. D. 1972. “Drug Use in Vietnam: A Survey Among Army Personnel in the Two Northern Corps.” Archives of General Psychiatry 26(3):279–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, X. 2013. “China’s Antidrug Policies in Southeast Asia’s Golden Triangle.” Asia Pacific Bulletin, no. 234. Honolulu, HI: East-West Center.Google Scholar
Thanh, L. 2019. “Ma túy đá rất rẻ, trước 700-800 triệu/kg, giờ chỉ còn 100 triệu.” (“Ice drugs are very cheap, VND 700–800 million per kilogram in the past but now only VND 100 million”). Retrieved September 18, 2020 (https://tuoitre.vn/ma-tuy-da-rat-re-truoc-700-800-trieu-kg-gio-chi-con-100-trieu-2019012218142812.htm).Google Scholar
Thảo, T. 2018. “Cam go cuôc chiến chống ma túy ở miền Tây xứ Nghệ (Kỳ 1).” (“Tough War Against Drugs in the Western Part of Nghe (Part 1)”). Phong su, July 23, 2018. Retrieved September 20, 2020 (http://congannghean.vn/phong-su/201807/cam-go-cuoc-chien-chong-ma-tuy-o-mien-tay-xu-nghe-ky-1-805508/).Google Scholar
Thomson, J. 1995. “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research.” International Studies Quarterly 39(2):213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuan, D. H. 2001. “Vietnam: Results of Drug Control Programme in 1998–2000 and Future Directions in 2001–2005.” Alternative Development: Sharing Good Practices Facing Common Problems: Regional Seminar on Alternative Development for Illicit Crop Eradication: Policies, Strategies and Actions: Held 16–19 July 2001 in Taunggyi, Myanmar. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations International Drug Control Programme, Regional Centre for East Asia and Pacific.Google Scholar
Tuyen, A. H. 2017. “International Cooperation to Anti-Narcotics in Vietnam.” Police Magazine 12(96):11–14 (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP). 2001. “Ky Son Alternative Development Project in Vietnam.” Pp. 123–8 in Alternative Development: Sharing Good Practices Facing Common Problems: Regional Seminar on Alternative Development for Illicit Crop Eradication: Policies, Strategies and Actions: Held 16–19 July 2001 in Taunggyi, Myanmar. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations International Drug Control Programme, Regional Centre for East Asia and Pacific.Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2006. Opium Poppy Cultivation in the Golden Triangle: Lao PDR, Myanmar, Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2012a. “Patterns and Trends of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants and Other Drugs: Asia and the Pacific 2012.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/Patterns_and_Trends_of_Amphetaime-Type_Stimulants_and_Other_Drugs_-_Asia_and_the_Pacific_-_2012.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2012b. “Viet Nam Country Programme 2012–2017.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/southeastasiaandpacific/vietnam/publication/CP_final_E.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2013. “Southeast Asia Opium Survey, 2013: Lao PDR, Myanmar.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/crop-monitoring/sea/SEA_Opium_Survey_2013_web.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2015a. “Partnership, Cooperation, and Action in the Greater Mekong Sub-region: The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Drug Control.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/southeastasiaandpacific/Publications/2017/MOU_Brochure.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2015b. “Southeast Asia Opium Survey 2015: Lao PDR, Myanmar.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/crop-monitoring/sea/Southeast_Asia_Opium_Survey_2015_web.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2015c. “World Drug Report, 2015.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/wdr2015/World_Drug_Report_2015.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2016. “Protecting Peace and Prosperity in Southeast Asia: Synchronizing Economic and Security Agendas: February 2016.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/southeastasiaandpacific/download/2017/Economic_Integration_07_05_Feb_2016.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2017a. “The Challenge of Synthetic Drugs in East and South-East Asia: Trends and Patterns of Amphetamine-type Stimulants and New Psychoactive Substances: A Report from the Global SMART Programme: June 2017.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/Trends_and_Patterns_of_ATS_and_NPS_2017.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2017b. “Myanmar Opium Survey: December 2017.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/southeastasiaandpacific/Publications/2017/Myanmar_Opium_Survey_2017_web.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2018. “Understanding the Synthetic Drug Market: the NPS Factor.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/Global_Smart_Update_2018_Vol.19.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and Standing Office on Drugs and Crime (SODC). 2012. “Amphetamine Type Stimulants in Vietnam: A Review of the Availability, Use, and Implications for Health and Security in Viet Nam.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/documents/southeastasiaandpacific/2012/05/ats-report-vietnam/ATS_EN_Final_10042012_-_reduced_size.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Vietnam. 2013. “ATS Second-most Popular Illicit Drug in Viet Nam, Heroin Still No.1.” Retrieved September 16, 2020 (https://www.unodc.org/southeastasiaandpacific/en/vietnam/2013/07/wdd/story.html).Google Scholar
United Nations Viet Nam. 2017. Viet Nam One UN Results Report 2017: Delivering as One to Implement the Third Generation One Strategic Plan 2017–2021. Hanoi, Vietnam: United Nations Vietnam.Google Scholar
United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency. 1992. Opium Poppy Cultivation and Heroin Processing in Southeast Asia. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency.Google Scholar
United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency. 2003. Vietnam: Country Brief: Status in International Drug Trafficking (DEA-03050). Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency.Google Scholar
Viêt Nam News. 2018. “Drug Trafficking Kingpins Killed in Son La Police Raid.” Viêt Nam News, July 3, 2018. Retrieved September 20, 2020 (https://vietnamnews.vn/society/450958/drug-trafficking-kingpins-killed-in-son-la-police-raid.html#ztkV4chYisjeSOdD.97).Google Scholar
Vietnam Television (VTV) (Writer) and T. t. P. T. l. v. P. Hsu (Director). 2018. “Long Luong, Van Ho, Son La - ‘Chao Lua’ ve Ma Tuy Tai Tay Bac.” (“Long Luong, Van Ho, Son La - ‘Central Location’ on Drugs at North-West”). In Lan theo Dau vet, produced by H. N. Lam. Hanoi, Vietnam: Vietnam Television (VTV).Google Scholar
Vinh, Quang Vu. 2002. “Hoan Thien He Thong Phap Luat co Lien Quan den Cong Tac Phong, Chong Toi Pham ve Ma Tuy.” (“Improving the Legal Framework on Prevention and Suppression Drug-Related Crimes”). Paper presented at the Hoi Thao ve Thuc Tien Dau Tranh Phong Chong Ma Tuy va Van De Hoan Thien Phap Luat Trong Phong, Chong Ma Tuy (Conference on Practices on Preventing and Combating Drug-Related Crimes and Some Issues to Improve Vietnam’s Legal Framework on Drug Control), Hanoi, Vietnam. UNODC’s Vietnam.Google Scholar
von Lampe, K. 2012. “Transnational Organized Crime Challenges for Future Research.” Crime, Law, and Social Change 58(2):179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuong, Hung Vu. 2007. “Phong, Chong Toi Pham Ma Tuy Trong Boi Canh Toan Cau Hoa va Hoi Nhap Kinh Te Quoc Te.” (“Preventing and Combating Drug Trafficking Within the Globalization and Integrated into International Economy”). Paper presented at Phong Chong Toi Pham Trong Boi Canh Toan Cau Hoa va Hoi Nhap Kinh Te Quoc Te, Hoi thao quoc gia do Bo Cong an to chuc (Luu Hanh noi bo) (Preventing and Combating Crime Within the Globalization and Integrated with International Economy, the National Conference organized by Ministry of Public Security (Internal Publication Only)). Hanoi, Vietnam: The People’s Security Publishing House.Google Scholar
Vuong, T., Ali, R., Baldwina, S., and Millsa, S.. 2012. “Drug Policy in Vietnam: A Decade of Change?” International Journal of Policy Analysis 23:319–26.Google Scholar
Vuong, Thu, Ritter, Alison, Shanahan, Marian, Ali, Robert, Nguyen, Nhu, Pham, Khue, Vuong, Thu T. A., and Le, Giang M.. 2018. “Outcomes of Compulsory Detention Compared to Community-Based Voluntary Methadone Maintenance Treatment in Vietnam.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 87(April):9–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, P. 2001. “Transnational Criminal Networks.” Pp. 61–97 in Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy, edited by Arquilla, J. and Ronfeldt, D.. Pittsburgh, PA: RAND.Google Scholar
Windle, J. 2012. “The Suppression of Illicit Opium Production in Viet Nam: An Introductory Narrative.” Crime, Law, and Social Change 57:425–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windle, J. 2016. “The Slow March to Harm Reduction: Drugs and Drug Policy in Vietnam.” Journal of Drug Policy Analysis 10(2):483–95.Google Scholar
Windle, J. 2017. “The Slow March to Harm Reduction: Drugs and Drug Policy in Vietnam.” Improving Global Drug Policy: Comparative Perspectives and UNGASS 2016. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar