Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:43:59.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

V. Cases Before the Court1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2008

Malcom D Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v United Kingdom).

Type
Decisions of International Tribunals International Court of Justice
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 2003 , pp. 802 - 810
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 ICJ Rep 1992, 3, 14. See Beveridge, F, ‘The Lockerbie Affair’, (1992) 41 ICLQ 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 ICJ Rep 1992, 231, 234.

4 See Beveridge, F, Case Note, (1999) 48 ICLQ 658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 ICJ Rep 1998, 237, 240.

6 ICJ Rep 1998, 749.

7 ICJ Rep 1999, 975.

8 ICJ Rep 2000, 140.

9 ICJ Rep 1992, 763.

10 ICJ Rep 1993, 35.

11 ICJ Rep 1996, 803.

12 See Evans, MD, Case Note, (1997) 46 ICLQ 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 ICJ Rep 1996, 902.

14 ICJ Rep 1998, 190.

15 ICJ Rep 1998, 269.

16 ICJ Rep 1998, 740.

17 ICJ Rep 2000, 137.

18 ICJ Rep 2001, 568.

19 ICJ Rep 1998, 190.

20 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2003/13.

21 ICJ Rep 1993, 3.

22 ICJ Rep 1993, 325.

23 See Gray, C, Case Note, (1994) 43 ICLQ 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 ICJ Rep 1993, 29.

25 ICJ Rep 1993, 470.

26 ICJ Rep 1995, 80.

27 ICJ Rep 1996, 595. See Gray, C, Case Note, (1997) 46 ICLQ 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 ICJ Rep 1996, 797.

29 ICJ Rep 1997, 243.

30 ICJ Rep 2001, 572.

31 ICJ Rep 1997, 243.

32 ICJ Rep 1998, 3.

33 ICJ Rep 1998, 743.

34 ICJ Rep 1997, 7.

35 See Okowa, PN, Case Note, (1998) 47 ICLQ 688.Google Scholar

36 ICJ Press Communiqué No 98/28.

37 ICJ Press Communiqué No 98/31.

38 ICJ Rep 1999, 1042.

39 ICJ Rep 2000, 146.

40 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/33

41 ICJ Rep 1999, 124 (Belgium); 259 (Canada); 363 (France); 422 (Germany); 482 (Italy); 542 (Netherlands); 656 (Portugal); 761 (Spain); 826 (United Kingdom); 916 (United States of America).

42 See Gray, C, Case Note, (2000) 49 ICLQ 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 ICJ Rep 1999, 988.

44 ICJ Rep 2000, 149.

45 ICJ Rep 2001, 13.

46 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/10.

47 ICJ Rep 1999, 1022.

48 ICJ Rep 2000, 11 land see Kritsiotis, D, Case Note, (2001) 50 ICLQ 662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 ICJ Rep 2001, 660.

50 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/32.

51 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2003/12.

52 ICJ Rep 1999, 1015.

53 ICJ Rep 2000, 3.

54 ICJ Rep 2000, 108.

55 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/34.

56 ICJ Rep 2000, 6.

57 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/17.

58 ICJ Rep 2001, 565.

59 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/20.

60 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2001/34.

61 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/07.

62 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/41.

63 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/19. See C Brown, Case Note, above, at 782.

64 ICJ Press Communiqué No.2002/22.

65 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/40.

66 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2003/9.

67 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/12.

68 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/37.

69 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2003/14.

70 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2002/39. See JG Merrills, Case Note, above at 797.

71 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2003/8. This judgment will be the subject of a Case Note in a subsequent part of the Quarterly.

72 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2003/10.