¹ Simpson, AW Brian, In the Highest Degree Odious: Detention without Trial in Wartime Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994). I have drawn very heavily on the invaluable work of professor Simpson, to whom I should at the outset acknowledge my great debt. I should also acknowledege the great help given to me in preparing this lecture by my judicial assistant (until recently), Mr Akash Nawbatt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² Ibid, 391.

³ Churchill, W, The Second World War, vol II (Cassell, 1949), 627.Google Scholar

⁴ See Gillman, and Gillman, , ‘Collar the Lot!’ (Quartet, 1980), 153, 309.Google Scholar

⁵ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Exparte Bugdaycay [1987] 1 AC 514, at 531F.Google Scholar

⁶ European Convention, Arts 3, 15.2.Google Scholar

⁷ In R v Secreary of State for the Home Department Exparte Cheblak [1991] 1 WLR 890, at 894 Lord Donaldson of Lymington MR observed that ‘we have all been brought up to believe, and do believe, that the liberty of the citizen under the law is the most fundamental of all freedoms’.Google Scholar

⁸ Holdsworth, , A History of English Law, 3rd edn (1966), vol IX, 104.Google Scholar

^{9 3}ST 1.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Gardiner, , The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), 209–10, Arts 11–15.Google Scholar

¹¹ Holdsworth, , op cit, vol IX, 116–18.Google Scholar

¹² Bell, DA, ‘Safeguarding the Rights of the Accused: Lawyers and Political Trials in France, 1716–1789’, in VanKley, (ed), The French Idea of Freedom: The Old Regime and the Declaration of Rights of 1789 (Stanford, 1994), 248.Google Scholar

¹³ Ibid, 234.

¹⁴ Ibid, 235.

¹⁵ Arts 3, 9.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Art 9.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Art 5.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Fifth Amendment to the constitution.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Art 40, (4.1), (4.2).Google Scholar

²⁰ Arts 21, 22.Google Scholar

²¹ Section 12(1).Google Scholar

²² Arts 7, 9.Google Scholar

²³ Sections 22, 23.Google Scholar

²⁴ Sections 24 and 25 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.Google Scholar

²⁵ Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the Mental Health Act 1983.Google Scholar

²⁶ Immigration Act 1971: para 16 of schedule 2, para 2 of schedule 3.Google Scholar

²⁷ Through the common law the crimes of false imprisonment and kidnapping and the statutory offences of child abduction and hostage taking.Google Scholar

²⁸ Through the tort of false imprisonment.Google Scholar

²⁹ Sharpe, , The Law of Habeas Corpus (Oxford, 1989), 94–5;Google ScholarForsyth, , Cases and Opinions on Constitutional Law (Stevens-Haynes, 1869), 452.Google Scholar

³⁰ See Holdsworth, op cit, vol XIII, 162.Google Scholar

³¹ Ibid, 203.

³² Ibid, vol XI, p.26.

³³ Simpson, , In the Highest Degree Odious, 34.Google ScholarSee also id, Human Rights and the End of Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 79–80.Google Scholar

³⁴ Ibid, 1081–2.

³⁵ Ibid, 83

³⁶ Ibid, 878.

³⁷ Ibid, 879.

³⁸ Ibid.

³⁹ Ibid.

⁴⁰ Ibid, 881.

⁴¹ Ibid, 909.

⁴² Ibid.

⁴³ Ibid, 910.

⁴⁴ Simpson, , In the Highest Degree Odious, 15.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Ibid, 13.

⁴⁶ Ibid, 17.

⁴⁷ Ibid.

⁴⁸ Ibid, 27–8.

⁴⁹ Ibid, 28, 31–3.

⁵⁰ Ibid, 21–2.

⁵¹ [1916] 1 KB 738, at 740.Google Scholar

⁵² [1917] AC 260, at 263.Google Scholar

⁵³ [1916] 1 KB 738, at 740.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ [1916] 1 KG 738 [1917] AC 260.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ R v Denison (1916) 32 TLR 528 (Lord Reading CJ, Scrutton and Avory JJ).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ex p Howsin (1917) 33 TLR 527 (Pickford and Scrutton LJJ and Neville J).Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Ronnfeldt v Phillips (1918) 34 TLR 553 (Darling J)Google Scholar

⁵⁸ (1918) 35 TLR 46.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Per Bankes LJ, at 46.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Per Scrutton LJ at 47.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Per Warrington LJ, at 47; but Scrutton LJ disagreed, 47.Google Scholar

⁶² R v Governor of Wormwood Scrubbs Prison [1920] 2 KB 305.Google Scholar

⁶³ At 311.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ R v Inspector of Cannon Row Police Station Exp Brady (1921) 37 TLR 854 (Lawrence CJ, Shearman and Sankey JJ).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Brady v Gibb (1921) 37 TLR 975.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ At 977.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Ibid.

⁶⁸ R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs Ex parte O'Brien [1923] 2 KB 361.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ [1923] AC 603.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ [1923] 2 KB 361, at 400.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Simpson, , In the Highest Degree Odious, 32–3.Google Scholar

⁷² Ibid, 42.

⁷³ [1917] AC 260.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Simpson, , In the Highest Degree Odious, 48.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Ibid, 58.

⁷⁶ R v Inland Revenue Commissioners Ex p Rossminster Ltd [1980] AC 952, at 1011.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Simpson, , In the Highest Degree Odious, 53, 78.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Ibid, 185. Churchill, , The Second World War, vol 2, 49.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Ibid, 107.

⁸⁰ Ibid, 108.

⁸¹ Ibid, 163, 258.

⁸² Ibid, 108.

⁸³ Churchill, , The Second World War, vol II, 246.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Simpson, , In the Highest Degree Odious, 222.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Ibid, 222.

⁸⁶ Some Were Spies (Hodden & Stoughton, 1954), 15.Google ScholarPubMed

⁸⁷ Simpson, , In the Highest Degree Odious, 267.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Ibid, 403.

⁸⁹ Ibid, 404.

⁹⁰ Ibid, 414.

⁹¹ Ibid, 166, 407.

⁹² Ibid, 390–1.

⁹³ R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs Ex p Lees [1941] 1 KB 72 (Humphreys, Oliver and Croom-Johnson JJ), at 74–5. Simpson, no doubt rightly, describes Lees as ‘a pretty nasty piece of work’: ‘Detention Without Trial’, n 154 below, 257. In an affidavit he averred ‘I do not like Jews…I do not like Lord Halifax’: see [1941] 1 KB 72, at 75.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ See ‘Detention Without Trial’, n 154 below, 257.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ [1941] 1 KB 72, at 78.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ At 75.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ At 79.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Ibid, at 80 (MacKinnon, Goddard and du Parcq LJJ).

⁹⁹ At 84.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Such as that in Stuart v Anderson and Morrison [1941] 2 All ER 665 where, in an action claiming damages for false imprisonment, Tucker J held that he could not enquire whether successive Home Secretaries had had reasonable cause to detain the plaintiff: see 670–1.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ R v Home Secretary Ex p Budd [1941] 2 All ER 749, at 751, 760.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Per Caldecote LCJ, at 754.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Ibid, at 756.

¹⁰⁴ Ibid, at 758.

¹⁰⁵ Ibid, at 759.

¹⁰⁶ Ibid, at 764–65.

¹⁰⁷ R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs Ex p Budd [1942] 2 KB 14.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Budd v Anderson [1943] KB 642.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Greene v Secretary of State for Home Affairs [1942] AC 284.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ See among other works, Heuston, , ‘Liversidge v Anderson in Retrospect’ (1970) 86 LQR 33;Google ScholarSimpson, , ‘Rhetoric, Reality and Regulation 18B’ (1988) Denning Law J 123;Google Scholarid, In the Highest Degree Odious, ch 16;Google ScholarBingham, T., ‘Mr Perlzweig, Mr Liversidge and Lord Atkin’; The Business of Judging (Oxford, 2000), 211.Google Scholar

¹¹² R v Brixton Prison (Governor) Exp Pitt-Rivers [1942] 1 All ER 207.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Simpson, , ‘Rhetoric, Reality and Regulation 18B’, at 136–42; id, In the Highest Degree Odious, at 341; information supplied by Professor Simpson.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ R v Inland Revenue Commissioners Exp Rossminster Ltd [1980] AC 952, at 1011.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Simpson, , ‘Rhetoric, Reality and Regulation 18B’, at 151; id, In the Highest Degree Odious, at 363, 419.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ Id, ‘Rhetoric, Reality, and Regulation 18B’, at 125. A number of other cases not reported in the Law Reports are discussed by ProfessorSimpson, in ‘Rhetoric, Reality and Regulation 18B’ and In the Highest Degree Odious.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ Persico, Joseph E, Roosevelt's Secret War (Random House, 2001) at 168, 439.Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Ozawa v US 260 US 178 (1922).Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Persico, op cit, 68.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Ibid, at 168.

¹²¹ Coombs, FA, ‘Congressional Opinion and War Relocation, 1943’, in Daniels, R et al. , Japanese Americans: From Relocation to Redress (Utah: University of Utah Press, 1986), at 91.Google Scholar

¹²² Persico, op cit, 168.Google Scholar

¹²³ Ibid, at 130–1, 167–70, 439–40. Since one of these intelligence sources had recently explored a plan to inject Hitler's vegetarian diet with female hormones so that his moustache would fall out and his voice turn soprano, the President's reliance might seem surprising: Persico, op cit, 166.

¹²⁴ Ibid, at 439.

¹²⁵ Daniels, R, ‘Relocation, Redress and the Report: A Historical Appraisal’, in Japanese Americans, above, at 7.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Hata, and Hata, , “Justice Delayed But Not Denied’, in Saunders, and Daniels, (eds), Alien Justice: Wartime Internment in Australia and North America (Queensland: University of Queensland, 2000), at 226–9.Google Scholar

¹²⁷ Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, Personal Justice Denied (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1982), at 8.Google Scholar

¹²⁸ Saito, N., ‘Justice Held Hostage: US Disregard for International Law in the World War II Internment of Japanese Peruvians—A Case Study’, 40 Boston College Law Review 275, at 320–1.Google Scholar

¹²⁹ Gardiner, Harvey, ‘The Latin-American Japanese and World War II’, Japanese Americans, op cit, 142.Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Ibid.

¹³¹ Ibid, at 143.

¹³² Ibid.

¹³³ Ibid.

¹³⁴ Ibid, at 144; Saito, op cit, at 287.

¹³⁵ Gardiner, op cit, at 144; Saito, op cit, at 292–7.Google Scholar

¹³⁶ Ibid, at 294.

¹³⁷ Gardiner, op cit, 144.Google Scholar

¹³⁸ Ibid, at 145.

¹³⁹ Saito, op cit, at 276.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Hirabayashi v United States 828 F 2d 591 (9th Cir, 1987), at 595.Google Scholar

¹⁴¹ Hirabayashi v United States 320 US 81 (1943).Google Scholar

¹⁴² At 105.Google Scholar

¹⁴³ Ball, , ‘Judicial Parsimony and Military Necessity Disinterred: A Re-examination of the Japanese Exclusion Cases, 1943–1944’, Japanese Americans, at 176–9.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁴ At 108.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁵ Yasui v United States 320 US 115 (1943).Google Scholar

¹⁴⁶ Korematsu v United States 323 US 214 (1944)Google Scholar

¹⁴⁷ At 223.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁸ At 242.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁹ Exp Mitsuye Endo 323 US 283 (1944).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁰ Korematsu v United States 584 F Supp 1406 (1984).Google Scholar

¹⁵¹ Hirabayashi v United States 828 F 2d 591 (9th Cir 1987).Google Scholar

¹⁵² Mochizuki v United States 41 Fed Cl 54 (1998); 4 3 Fed Cl 97 (1999).Google Scholar

¹⁵³ In All the Laws But One: Civil Liberties in Wartime (Knopf, 1998), Chief Justice Rehnquist excuses but does not seek to support this decision.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁴ I would broadly agree with the judgment of ProfessorSimpson, in ‘Detention without Trial in the Second World War: Comparing the British and American Experiences’ 16 Florida State Univ Law Rev (1988) 225, at 249–50, 265–7.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁵ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁶ Korematsu v United States 584 F Supp 1406 (1984), at 1420.Google Scholar