Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:55:26.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE JUDGES' DILEMMA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Hope of Craighead
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 753 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 British Institute of International and Comparative Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lord Bingham of Cornhill, ‘The Rule of Law’ [2007] CLJ 67.

2 ibid 75.

3 GB Shaw, ‘Preface on Doctors’ in The Doctor's Dilemma: A Tragedy (Penguin, London, 1913).

4 Criminal Justice Act 2003 (UK) s 225.

5 Fredman, S, ‘From Deference to Democracy: The Role of Equality under the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2006] 122 LQR 53, 76.Google Scholar

6 ibid 78.

7 Baroness Hale of Richmond, ‘Law Lords at the Margins’ JUSTICE: Tom Sargant Memorial Annual Lecture, 15 October 2008.

8 R (Al-Jedda) v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] AC 332.

9 para 125.

10 A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2) [2006] 2 AC 221.

11 Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as the High Court of Justice, HC 5100/94 and others, 6 September 1999.

12 J Edwards, The Attorney General, Politics and the Public Interest (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1984) 324, quoted in R (Corner House Research and Campaign against Arms Trade v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] EWHC Admin 714, para 81.

13 para 39.

14 In re G (Adoption: Unmarried Couple) [2009] 1 AC 173.

15 N v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 296.

16 D v United Kingdom [1997] 24 EHRR 423.

17 F v United Kingdom (application no. 17341/03, 22 June 2004).

18 Z and T v United Kingdom (application no. 27034/05, 28 February 2006).

19 EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] 3 WLR 931 (HL).

20 [2006] EWCA Civ 1531, para 69.

21 Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, para 111.

22 R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323, para 24.

23 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, Schedule 3, para 6(3).

24 Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd [2004] QB.

25 Evans v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 34.

26 para 73.

27 As Lord Hoffmann recognized in Secretary of State for the Home Department v MB [2008] AC 440.

28 See Chahal v United Kingdom (1996) EHRR 413.

29 Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997, section 6.

30 [2004] 2 AC, para 20; see also Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood in R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] 1 AC 153, para 106.

31 See Van Colle v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police [2009] 1 AC 224.

32 The Rt Hon Lady Justice Arden, ‘Building a Better Society’ JUSTICE 10th Annual Human Rights Law Conference, 21 October 2008.