No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 January 2008
1. Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom).
1. I.C.J. Rep. 1992, 3, 14. See Beveridge, F., “The Lockerbie Affair”, (1992) 41 I.C.L.Q. 907.Google Scholar
2. I.C.J. Rep. 1992, 231, 234.
3. See Beveridge, F., Case Note, (1999) 48 I.C.L.Q. 658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 237, 240.
5. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 749.
6. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/36.
7. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/27.
8. I.C.J. Rep. 1992, 763.
9. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 35.
10. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 803.
11. See Evans, M. D., Case Note, (1997) 46 I.C.L.Q. 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 902.
13. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 190.
14. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 269.
15. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 740.
16. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/26.
17. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 3.
18. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 325.
19. See Gray, C., Case Note, (1994) 43 I.C.L.Q. 705.Google Scholar
20. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 29.
21. I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 470.
22. I.C.J. Rep. 1995, 80.
23. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 595. See Gray, C., Case Note, (1997) 46 I.C.L.Q. 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 797.
25. I.C.J. Rep. 1997, 243.
26. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 3.
27. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 743.
28. I.C.J. Rep. 1997, 7.
29. See Okowa, P. N., Case Note, (1998) 47 I.C.L.Q. 688.Google Scholar
30. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 98/28
31. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 98/31.
32. I.C.J. Rep. 1994, 105.
33. I.C.J. Rep. 1996, 13. See Merrills, J. G., Case Note, (1997) 46 I.C.L.Q. 676.Google Scholar
34. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 275.
35. See Merrills, J. G., Case Note, (1999) 48 I.C.L.Q. 651.Google Scholar
36. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 275.
37. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 420.
38. I.C.J. Rep. 1999, 24.
39. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/4.
40. I.C.J. Rep. 1999, 31. See Merrills, J. G., Case Note, (1999) 48 I.C.L.Q. 651 at 657–658.Google Scholar
41. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/44. See Merrills, J. G., Case Note, (2000) 49 I.C.L.Q. 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. I.C.J. Rep. 1998, 429.
43. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/40.
44. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/14.
45. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/33.
46. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/7.
47. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/49.
48. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/28.
49. I.C.J. Rep. 1999, 9. See Addo, M. K., Case Note, (1999) 58 I.C.L.Q. 673.Google Scholar
50. I.C.J. Rep. 1999, 28.
51. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/38.
52. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/39.
53. See Gray, C., Case Note, Case Note, (2000) 49 I.C.L.Q. 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/33.
55. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/25
56. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/29.
57. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/5.
58. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/45.
59. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/24 and see D. Kritsiotis, above, p.662.
60. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 99/41.
61. I.C.J. Rep. 2000, 3.
62. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/21
63. I.C.J. Rep. 2000, 6.
64. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/32.
65. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/40. See C. L. Wickremasinghe, above, p.670.
66. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2000/41.
67. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/8.
68. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/11.
69. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/12.
70. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/1.
71. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/2.
72. I.C.J. Press Communiqué No. 2001/9.