Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:12:20.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I. FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Stephen Weatherill
Stephen Weatherill
Affiliation:
Somerville College and Law Faculty, University of Oxford.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Current Developments: European Union Law
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 985 - 993
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 British Institute of International and Comparative Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (2006) 55 ICLQ 457.

2 cf art I-8 of the (now extinct) Treaty establishing a Constitution, OJ 2004 C310.

3 European Commission, ‘A Single Market for Citizens’ COM (2007) 60, 3.Google Scholar

4 Cases C-267 and C-268/91 [1993] ECR I-6097.

5 Case C-244/06 Dynamic Medien [2008] ECR I-505.

6 Case C-441/04 [2006] ECR I-2093.

7 See this survey (1994) 43 ICLQ 207, 210–11, (1996) 45 ICLQ 213, 213–215.

8 [2008] 2 All ER 95.

9 Case C-110/05 Commission v Italy judgment of 10 February 2009.

10 Case C-142/05 Åklagaren v Mickelsson, Roos.

11 See especially Oliver, P and Enchelmaier, S, ‘Free Movement of Goods: Recent Developments in the case law’ (2007) 44 CML Rev 649, 679–683 and 704Google Scholar; also Gormley, L, ‘Silver Threads among the Gold … 50 Years of the Free Movement of Goods’ (2008) 31 Fordham Intl Law Jnl 1637.Google Scholar

12 Case 120/78 Rewe-Zentrale AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein [1979] ECR 649.

13 Case C-147/04 de Groot [2006] ECR I-245.

14 Case C-265/06 Commission v Portugal [2008] ECR I-2245.

15 (n 6).

16 Case C-205/07 judgment of 16 December 2008. AG Trstenjak, seeking inspiration from Keck (n 4) pressed a radical revision of the scope of art 29 on the Court, but the Court adhered to its orthodox approach.

17 (n 5).

18 Case C-219/07 [2008] ECR I-4475.

19 Case C-244/06 (n 5) para 39; also eg Case C-379/98 Preussen Elektra [2001] ECR I-2099 para 74.

20 Case C-112/00 [2003] ECR I-5659; see (2006) 55 ICLQ 457.

21 Case C-438/05 [2007] ECR I-10779, Case C-341/05 [2007] ECR I-11767.

22 eg Davies, A, ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?’ (2008) 37 Industrial Law Journal 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Azoulai, L, ‘The Court of Justice and the Social Market Economy: the Emergence of an Ideal and the Conditions for its Realization’ (2008) 45 CML Rev 1335Google Scholar; Joerges, C and Rödl, F, ‘Informal Politics, Formalised Law and the ‘Social Deficit’ of European Integration: Reflections after the Judgments of the ECJ in Viking and Laval’ (2009) 15 ELJ 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Case C-376/98 [2000] ECR I-8419; see (2001) 50 ICLQ 158.

24 Some considered in the previous survey (n 1).

25 Directive 2003/33 [2003] OJ, L152/16, Case C-380/03 Germany v Parliament and Council [2006] ECR I-11573.

26 cf S Weatherill, ‘Constitutional Issues—How Much is Best Left Unsaid?’ in S Vogenauer and S Weatherill (eds), The Harmonisation of European Contract Law: Implications for European Private Laws, Business and Legal Practice (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2006).

27 Pending Case C-58/08 Vodafone, O2 et al, a reference made by the English High Court on 13 February 2008. For an argument that art 95 is not a valid base see Brennke, Working Paper http://www2.jura.uni-halle.de/INSTITUT/Heft_79.pdf

28 ibid (n 13) and (n 14).

29 Dir 98/34 [1998] OJ L204/37, itself amended by Dir 98/48 L217/18.

30 Especially (2003) 52 ICLQ 1021, 1021–25, (2001) 50 ICLQ 158, 158–59, 164–65.

31 In 2006, [2007] OJ C151/10, in 2007, [2008] OJ C132/27. For discussion of regulatory technique see Andersen, S, ‘The Functional Overlap of Enforcement and Implementation Tools’ (2007) 3 Croatian Ybk Euro Law & Policy 193.Google Scholar

32 [2008] OJ L218/21.

33 Directive 2006/123 [2006] OJ L376/36.

34 Public Consultation on a Future Single Market Policy: Summary of Responses SEC (2006) 1215.

35 See especially COM (2006) 211 A Citizens' Agenda: Delivering Results for Europe; COM (2007) 35 The Internal Market for Goods: A Cornerstone of Europe's competitiveness; COM (2007) 502 A Europe of Results— Applying Community Law.

36 COM (2007) 724.

37 See http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/regulation/internal_market_package/index_en.htm for the 2007 Commission documentation.

38 For a report that is generally supportive see House of Lords EU Committee, 5th Report of Session 2007/08, The Single Market: Wallflower or Dancing Partner? Inquiry into the European Commission's Review of the Single Market (HL Paper 36-I 2008). See also Kovar, R, ‘Le législateur communautaire encadre le régime de la mises des produits dans le marché intérieur’ 44(2) RTDE 2008, 289.Google Scholar