Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T16:26:35.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Area Between Greenland and Jan Ma Yen (Denmark v. Norway)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2008

Malcolm D. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Court of Justice: Recent Cases
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 697 - 704
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*The aim of this annual section is to provide a guide to the current work of the 1CJ by summarising the essential aspects of recent cases and highlighting points of particular significance.
1

Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Denmark v. Norway), judgment of 14 June 1993, I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 38 (referred to as the Jan Mayen case). The judgment of the Court was adopted with 14 votes in favour and 1, Judge ad hoc Fischer, against. Judges Oda, Evensen, Aguilar Mawdsley and Ranjeva appended declarations. Judges Oda, Schwebel, Shahabuddeen, Weeramantry and Abijola appended separate opinions.

References

1 Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Denmark v. Norway), judgment of 14 June 1993, I.C.J. Rep. 1993, 38 (referred to as the Jan Mayen case). The judgment of the Court was adopted with 14 votes in favour and 1, Judge ad hoc Fischer, against. Judges Oda, Evensen, Aguilar Mawdsley and Ranjeva appended declarations. Judges Oda, Schwebel, Shahabuddeen, Weeramantry and Abijola appended separate opinions.