¹ Edwin, Vermulst, Antidumping Law and Practice in the United States and the European Communities (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987)Google Scholar; John, Jackson and Edwin, Vermulst (eds), Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1990)Google Scholar; Edwin, Vermulst, Jacques, Bourgeois, and Paul, Waer (eds), Rules of Origin in International Trade: A Comparative Study (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1994)Google Scholar; Edwin, Vermulst and Paul, Waer, EC Anti-Dumping Law and Practice (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1996)Google Scholar; Stefano, Inama and Edwin, Vermulst, Customs and Trade Laws of the European Community (Kluwer, The Hague, 1999)Google Scholar; Edwin, Vermulst and Folkert, Graafsma, WTO Disputes: Anti-Dumping, Subsidies & Safeguards (Cameron May, London, 2002)Google Scholar; Edwin, Vermulst, Customs and Trade Laws as Tools of Protectionism: Selected Essays (Cameron May, London, 2005).Google Scholar

² See <http://www.worldtradelaw.net>, <http://www.wto.org/appellatebody>, and Kara, Leitner and Simon, Lester, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement from 1995 to 2005: A Statistical Analysis’ (2006) 9 Journal of International Economic Law 219, 224.Google Scholar

³ See, eg, Michael, Finger, Francis, Ng, and Sonam, Wangchuk, Antidumping as Safeguard Policy, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2730 (2001).Google Scholar

⁴ See, eg, WTO Press Release 458, ‘WTO Secretariat reports new anti-dumping investigations continue to decline, while new final measures show increase’, 27 11 2006.Google Scholar

⁵ Judith, Czako, Johann, Human, and Jorge, Miranda, A Handbook on Anti-Dumping Investigations (CUP, Cambridge, 2003).Google Scholar

⁶ James, Durling and Matthew, Nicely, Understanding the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement: Negotiating History and Subsequent Interpretation (Cameron May, London, 2002).Google Scholar See also Terence, Stewart (ed), The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History (1986–1992): Antidumping (Kluwer, Deventer, 1993).Google Scholar

⁷ Terence, Stewart and Amy, Dwyer, WTO Antidumping and Subsidy Agreements: a Practitioner's Guide to ‘Sunset’ Reviews in Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the United States (Kluwer, The Hague, 1998).Google Scholar

⁸ Appellate Body Report, European Communities: Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India (‘EC—Bed Linen’), WT/DS141/AB/R, circulated 1 03 2001Google Scholar, adopted 12 03 2001, para 66.Google Scholar

⁹ See most recently Appellate Body Report, United States—Measures Relating to Zeroing and Sunset Reviews (‘US—Zeroing (Japan)’), WT/DS322/AB/R, circulated 9 01 2007Google Scholar, not yet adopted at time of writing; Appellate Body Report, United States—Laws, Regulations and Methodology for Calculating Dumping Margins (‘Zeroing’) (‘US—Zeroing (EC)’), WT/DS294/AB/R, circulated 18 04 2006, adopted 9 05 2006Google Scholar; Appellate Body Report, United States—Final Dumping Determination on Softwood Lumber from Canada, Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada (‘US—Softwood Lumber V (Article 21.5—Canada)’), WT/DS264/AB/RW, circulated 15 08 2006, adopted 1 09 2006.Google Scholar

¹⁰ See most recently Panel Report, United States—Sunset Reviews of Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina, Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Argentina, WT/DS268/R, circulated 30 11 2006.Google Scholar

¹¹ See WTO news item, ‘Viet Nam joins WTO with Director-General's tribute for true grit’, 11 01 2007.Google Scholar