Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:22:43.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Development in German Matrimonial Property Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

O. Kahn-Freund
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1953 , pp. 611 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 611 note 1 Jones v. Maynard [1951] Ch. 572; Rimmer y. Rimmer [1952] 2 All E.R. 863, C.A.

page 613 note 2 Partnership Act, 1890, s. 2 (3) (b).

page 613 note 3 Contrast, e.g., Balfour v. Balfour [1919] 2 K.B. 571, and Rimmer v. Rimmer, supra, with Hoddinott v. Hoddinott [1949] 2 K.B. 406. Some aspects of the problem are discussed in Kahn-Freund, “Inconsistencies and Injustices in the Law of Husband and Wife” (1953), 16 Modern Law Review, pp. 34 et seq.

page 613 note 4 Cases in note 1 above, and also those on the wife's right to occupy the matrimonial home, e.g., Bendall v. McWhirter [1952] 2 Q.B. 466. The idea of the irrevocable licence enjoyed by the spouse who is not the owner or legal tenant of the matrimonial home introduces a community principle in the form of the community of occupation.

page 613 note 5 Decisions of January 31, 1949, C.S.133/49 (KL); October 25, 1950, C.S.509/50 (KL); May 9, 1952, K(S)17/52.