Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:45:06.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Is the Optimal Period for Measuring Hand Hygiene Compliance: Are Longer Periods Better than 20-Minute Periods?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sheldon Stone
Affiliation:
University College London (UCL) Medical School, London, United Kingdom
Chris Fuller*
Affiliation:
UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, London, United Kingdom
Susan Michie
Affiliation:
UCL Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, London, United Kingdom
John McAteer
Affiliation:
UCL Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, London, United Kingdom
Andre Charlett
Affiliation:
Health Protection Services, Health Protection Agency, London, United Kingdom
*
UCL Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London (Hampstead Campus), Royal Free Hospital, London, NW3 2PF, United Kingdom ([email protected])

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Briefs
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Gould, DJ, Chudleigh, J, Drey, NS, Moralejo, D. Measuring handwashing performance in health service audits and research studies. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:109115.Google Scholar
2.World Health Organization (WHO) Patient Safety. A World Alliance For Safer Health Care. SAVE LIVES: Clean Your Hands. Hand Hygiene Technical Reference to Be Used by Health-Care Workers, Trainers and Observers of Hand Hygiene Practices. Geneva: WHO, 2009.Google Scholar
3.Joint Commission. Measuring Hand Hygiene Adherence: Overcoming the Challenges. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission, 2009.Google Scholar
4.McAteer, J, Stone, S, Fuller, C, et al.Development of an observational measure of healthcare worker hand-hygiene behaviour: the hand-hygiene observation tool (HHOT). J Hosp Infect 2008;68:222229.Google Scholar
5.Stone, S, Fuller, C, Savage, J, et al.Report to the Patient Safety Research Programme on “The National Observation Study to Evaluate the Cleanyourhands Campaign (NOSEC)” and “The Feedback Intervention Trial (FIT).” http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-mds/haps/projects/cfhep/psrp/finalreports/PS029FinalReportStone.pdf. Published December 2010. Accessed April 25, 2012.Google Scholar
6.Fuller, C, Besser, S, Cookson, B, et al.Assessment of blinding of hand hygiene observers in randomised controlled trials of hand hygiene interventions. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:332334.Google Scholar
7.Baer, DM, Harrison, R, Fradenburg, L, Petersen, D, Milla, S. Some pragmatics in the valid and reliable recording of direcdy observed behaviour. Res Soc Work Pract 2005;15:440451.Google Scholar
8.Gittelsohn, J, Shankar, AV, West, KP, Ram, RM, Gnywali, T. Estimating reactivity in direct observation studies of health behaviours. Human Organization 1997;56:182189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for hand-hygiene in healthcare settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA hand-hygiene task force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23(suppl):340.Google Scholar
10.World Health Organziation (WHO). Appendix 4: monitoring hand hygiene by direct methods. In: WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. Geneva: WHO, 2009.Google Scholar