Article contents
Utilizing a real-time discussion approach to improve the appropriateness of Clostridioides difficile testing and the potential unintended consequences of this strategy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2020
Abstract
We report electronic medical record interventions to reduce Clostridioides difficile testing risk ‘alert fatigue.’ We used a behavioral approach to diagnostic stewardship and observed a decrease in the number of tests ordered of ~4.5 per month (P < .0001). Although the number of inappropriate tests decreased during the study period, delayed testing increased.
- Type
- Concise Communication
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.
Footnotes
PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: An abstract related to this manuscript has been accepted for the 2020 SHEA conference.
References
Fabre, V, Markou, T, Sick-Samuels, A, et al.Impact of case-specific education and face-to-face feedback to prescribers and nurses in the management of hospitalized patients with a positive Clostridium difficile test. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018;5:ofy226.10.1093/ofid/ofy226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madden, GR, German Mesner, I, Cox, HL, et al.Reduced Clostridium difficile tests and laboratory-identified events with a computerized clinical decision support tool and financial incentive. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:737–740.10.1017/ice.2018.53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madden, GR, Weinstein, RA, Sifri, CD. Diagnostic stewardship for healthcare-associated infections: opportunities and challenges to safely reduce test use. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:214–218.10.1017/ice.2017.278CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, LC, Gerding, DN, Johnson, S, et al.Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:e1–e48.10.1093/cid/cix1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, C, Maragakis, LL. Diagnostic stewardship for Clostridiodes difficile testing: from laxatives to diarrhea and beyond. Clin Infect Dis 2019; pii: ciz982. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz982.Google Scholar
White, NC, Mendo-Lopez, R, Papamichael, K, et al.Laxative use does not preclude diagnosis or reduce disease severity in Clostridiodes difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2019; pii: ciz978. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz978.Google Scholar
Kara, A, Tahir, M, Snyderman, W, Brinkman, A, Fadel, W, Dbeibo, L. Why do clinicians order inappropriate Clostridium difficile testing? An exploratory study. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:285–289.10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, SJ, Heaton, KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:920–924.10.3109/00365529709011203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, JE, Card, AJ. The problem with plan-do-study-act cycles. BMJ Qual Safety 2016;25:147–152.10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dbeibo, L, Kelley, K, Beeler, C, et al.Achieving Clostridioides difficile infection Health and Human Services 2020 goals: using agile implementation to bring evidence to the bedside. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:237–239.Google Scholar
Azar, J, Kelley, K, Dunscomb, J, et al.Using the agile implementation model to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:33–37.10.1016/j.ajic.2018.07.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pronovost, PJ. 2011. Navigating adaptive challenges in quality improvement. BMJ Qual Safety 20:560–563.10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sayedy, L, Kothari, D, Richards, RJ. Toxic megacolon associated Clostridium difficile colitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;2:293–297.10.4253/wjge.v2.i8.293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donskey, CJ. Preventing transmission of Clostridium difficile: is the answer blowing in the wind? Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:1458–1461.10.1086/652649CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 1
- Cited by