Article contents
Utilization of the Sharing Antimicrobial Reports for Pediatric Stewardship (SHARPS) Collaborative electronic mailing list (listserv) by healthcare professionals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2020
Abstract
Optimizing pediatric antimicrobial stewardship is challenging. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 515 original e-mails to 482 members of the Sharing Antimicrobial Reports for Pediatric Stewardship (SHARPS) Collaborative electronic mailing list ([email protected]). The plurality of threads discussed clinical practice guidelines, and pharmacists were most likely to initiate and respond. Representation was geographically diverse within and outside the United States.
- Type
- Concise Communication
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
References
Barlam, TF, Cosgrove, SE, Abbo, LM, et al. Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:e51–e77.10.1093/cid/ciw118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs; regulatory provisions to promote program efficiency, transparency, and burden reduction; fire safety requirements for certain dialysis facilities; hospital and critical access hospitals (CAH) changes to promote innovation, flexibility, and improvement in patient care. Federal Register website. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/09/30/2019-20736/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-regulatory-provisions-to-promote-program-efficiency-transparency-and. Published 2019. Accessd December 8, 2020.Google Scholar
McPherson, C, Lee, BR, Terrill, C, et al. Characteristics of pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs: current status of the sharing antimicrobial reports for pediatric Stewardship (SHARPS) Collaborative. Antibiotics (Basel) 2018;7:4. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics7010004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prescott, WA Jr, Dahl, EM, Hutchinson, DJ. Education in pediatrics in US colleges and schools of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ 2014;78:51.10.5688/ajpe78351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiot, AB, Baker, RC, Dewitt, TG. When and how pediatric history and physical diagnosis are taught in medical school: a survey of pediatric clerkship directors. Hosp Pediatr 2013;3:139–143.10.1542/hpeds.2012-0058CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, S, de Jonge, D, Ziviani, J, Jones, A. Paediatricots: utilisation of an Australian list serve to support occupational therapists working with children. Aust Occup Ther J 2009;56:63–71.10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00716.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCartney, PR. Internet communication and discussion lists for perinatal nurses. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 1999;12:26–40.10.1097/00005237-199903000-00004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrier, L, Hadjipanayis, A, Stiris, T, et al. Off-Label use of medicines in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents: a joint policy statement by the European Academy of Paediatrics and the European society for Developmental Perinatal and Pediatric Pharmacology. Eur J Pediatr 2020;179:839–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nir-Neuman, H, Abu-Kishk, I, Toledano, M, Heyman, E, Ziv-Baran, T, Berkovitch, M. Unlicensed and off-label medication use in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units: no change over a decade. Adv Ther 2018;35:1122–1132.10.1007/s12325-018-0732-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, K. The challenges of pediatric drug development. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2019;90:128–134.10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.01.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 3
- Cited by