Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:37:38.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Electronic Surveillance to Drive Improvement in Hospital Infection Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Rosa R. Baier  and
Stefan Gravenstein
Rosa R. Baier
Affiliation:
Healthcentric Advisors, Providence, Rhode Island; and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode, Island
Stefan Gravenstein*
Affiliation:
Healthcentric Advisors, Providence, Rhode Island; and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode, Island
*
Healthcentric Advisors, 235 Promenade Street, Suite 500, Box 18, Providence, RI 02908 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , February 2012 , pp. 112 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Palumbo, AJ, Loveless, PA, Moll, ME, Ostroff, S. Evaluation of healthcare-associated infection surveillance in Pennsylvania hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(2):105–111 (in this issue).Google Scholar
2.Baier, R, Butterfield, K, Patry, G, Harris, Y, Gravenstein, S. Identifying star performers: the relationship between ambitious targets and nursing home quality improvement. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57(8):1498–1503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Baier, RR, Butterfield, K, Harris, Y, Gravenstein, S. Aiming for star performance: the relationship between setting targets and improved nursing home quality of care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2008;9(8):594–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.University of Alabama at Birmingham. Achievable Benchmarks of Care (ABC): User Manual. http://main.uab.edu/show.asp?durki=11311. Accessed October 30, 2011.Google Scholar
5.Medicare program; proposed changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 2012 rates, 76 Federal Register 25788 (2011). http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/05/05/2011-9644/medicare-program-proposed-changes-to-the-hospital-inpatient-prospective-payment-systems-for-acute. Accessed October 28, 2011.Google Scholar
6.Stamper, PD, Alcabasa, R, Aird, D, et al. Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47(2):373–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Tenover, FC, Novak-Weekly, S, Woods, CW, et al. Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48(10):3719–3724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Chapin, KC, Dickenson, RA, Andrea, SB. Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin. J Mol Diagn 2011:13(4):395–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed