Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:54:10.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal vs Risk Factor Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Large Multicenter Tertiary Care Facility in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2015

V. R. Roth ,
T. Longpre ,
M. Taljaard ,
D. Coyle ,
K. N. Suh ,
K. A. Muldoon ,
K. Ramotar  and
A. Forster
V. R. Roth*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, the Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
T. Longpre
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
M. Taljaard
Affiliation:
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
D. Coyle
Affiliation:
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
K. N. Suh
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, the Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
K. A. Muldoon
Affiliation:
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
K. Ramotar
Affiliation:
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
A. Forster
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, the Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
*
Address correspondence to V. R. Roth, MD, Ottawa Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON. K1H 8L6 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effectiveness of a universal screening program compared with a risk factor–based program in reducing the rates of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among admitted patients at the Ottawa Hospital.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental study.

SETTING

Ottawa Hospital, a multicenter tertiary care facility with 3 main campuses, approximately 47,000 admissions per year, and 1,200 beds.

METHODS

From January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2007 (24 months), admitted patients underwent risk factor–based MRSA screening. From January 1, 2008 through August 31, 2009 (20 months), all patients admitted underwent universal MRSA screening. To measure the effectiveness of this intervention, segmented regression modeling was used to examine monthly nosocomial MRSA incidence rates per 100,000 patient-days before and during the intervention period. To assess secular trends, nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection, mupirocin prescriptions, and regional MRSA rates were investigated as controls.

RESULTS

The nosocomial MRSA incidence rate was 46.79 cases per 100,000 patient-days, with no significant differences before and after intervention. The MRSA detection rate per 1,000 admissions increased from 9.8 during risk factor–based screening to 26.2 during universal screening. A total of 644 new nosocomial MRSA cases were observed in 1,448,488 patient-days, 323 during risk factor–based screening and 321 during universal screening. Secular trends in C. difficile infection rates and mupirocin prescriptions remained stable after the intervention whereas population-level MRSA rates decreased.

CONCLUSION

At Ottawa Hospital, the introduction of universal MRSA admission screening did not significantly affect the rates of nosocomial MRSA compared with risk factor–based screening.

Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;37(1):41–48

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 41 - 48
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Haessler, S, Mackenzie, T, Kirkland, KB. Long-term outcomes following infection with meticillin-resistant or meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus . J Hosp Infect 2008;69:39–45; doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2008.01.008.Google Scholar
2. Blot, SI, Vandewoude, KH, Hoste, EA, Colardyn, FA. Outcome and attributable mortality in critically ill patients with bacteremia involving methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2229–2235; doi:10.1001/archinte.162.19.2229.Google Scholar
3. Lodise, TP, McKinnon, PS. Clinical and economic impact of methicillin resistance in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;52:113–122; doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.02.007.Google Scholar
4. Kopp, BJ, Nix, DE, Armstrong, EP. Clinical and economic analysis of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:1377–1382; doi:10.1345/aph.1E028.Google Scholar
5. Rello, J, Torres, A, Ricart, M, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia by Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive episodes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:1545–1549; doi:10.1164/ajrccm.150.6.7952612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Shorr, AF, Combes, A, Kollef, MH, Chastre, J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prolongs intensive care unit stay in ventilator-associated pneumonia, despite initially appropriate antibiotic therapy. Crit Care Med 2006;34:700–706; doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000201885.57697.21.Google Scholar
7. Stryjewski, ME, Corey, GR. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an evolving pathogen. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:10–19; doi:10.1093/cid/cit613.Google Scholar
8. Salgado, CD, Farr, BM, Calfee, DP. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:131–139; doi:10.1086/345436.Google Scholar
9. Sehulster, L, Chinn, RY ;, CDC ;, HICPAC. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52:1–42.Google Scholar
10. Muto, CA, Jernigan, JA, Ostrowsky, BE, et al. SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:362–386; doi:10.1086/502213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Ziakas, P, Zacharioudakis, IM, Zervou, FN, Mylonakis, E. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevention strategies in the ICU: a clinical decision analysis. Crit Care Med 2015;43:382–393; doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Cairns, S, Packer, S, Reilly, J, Leanord, A. Targeted MRSA screening can be as effective as universal screening. Br Med J 2014;349:g5075. doi:10.1136/bmj.g5075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Otter, JA, Tosas-Auguet, O, Herdman, MT, et al. Implications of targeted versus universal admission screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in a London hospital. J Hosp Infect 2014;87:171–174; doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2014.04.005.Google Scholar
14. Edmond, MB, Wenzel, RP. Screening inpatients for MRSA—case closed. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2314–2315; doi:10.1056/NEJMe1304831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. National Services Scotland. NHS Scotland MRSA Screening Pathfinder Programme. Edinburgh, Scotland; 2011.Google Scholar
16. Robicsek, A, Beaumont, JL, Paule, SM, et al. Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:409–418; doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00003.Google Scholar
17. Reilly, JS, Stewart, S, Christie, P, et al. Universal screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: interim results from the NHS Scotland pathfinder project. J Hosp Infect 2010;74:35–41; doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Lee, BY, Bailey, RR, Smith, KJ, et al. Universal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surveillance for adults at hospital admission: an economic model and analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:598–606; doi:10.1086/652524.Google Scholar
19. Jain, R, Kralovic, SM, Evans, ME, et al. Veterans Affairs initiative to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1419–1430; doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1007474.Google Scholar
20. Leonhardt, KK, Yakusheva, O, Phelan, D, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost benefit of universal versus targeted methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening upon admission in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:797–803; doi:10.1086/660875.Google Scholar
21. Glick, SB, Samson, DJ, Huang, ES, Vats, V, Aronson, N, Weber, SG. Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a comparative effectiveness review. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:148–155. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2013.07.020.Google Scholar
22. Ottawa Hospital Annual Report. Compassionate People: World Class Care. Ottawa; 2014.Google Scholar
23. Klevens, R, Morrison, MA, Nadle, J, et al. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 2007;298:1763–1771; doi:10.1016/S0084-3954(08)79046-8.Google Scholar
24. Conterno, LO, Shymanski, J, Ramotar, K, et al. Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: impact on nosocomial transmission and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1134–1141; doi:10.1086/520099.Google Scholar
25. Champlain Local Health Integration Network. Champlain LHIN: Integrated Health Service Plan 2010–2013. Ottawa; 2009.Google Scholar
26. Charlson, ME, Pompei, P, Ales, KL, MacKenzie, CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–383.Google Scholar
27. Carroll, N. Application of segmented regression analysis to the Kaiser Permanente Colorado Critical Drug Interaction Program. In Proceedings of the Western Users of SAS Software 2008 Conference. Universal City, CA: SAS; 2008:1–8.Google Scholar
28. Wagner, AK, Soumerai, SB, Zhang, F, Ross-Degnan, D. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther 2002;27:299–309; doi:10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Pedan, A. Analysis of count data using the SAS system. Stat Data Anal Data Min 2001;247:1–6.Google Scholar
30. Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP). Results of the Surveillance of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: From 1995-2009. Ottawa; 2010.Google Scholar
31. European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS). EARSS Annual Report 2008. Amsterdam; 2009.Google Scholar
32. Forrester, M, Pettitt, AN. Use of stochastic epidemic modeling to quantify transmission rates of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:598–606; doi:10.1086/502588.Google Scholar
33. Rubin, RJ, Harrington, CA, Poon, A, Dietrich, K, Greene, JA, Moiduddin, A. The economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection in New York City hospitals. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:9–17; doi:10.3201/eid0501.990102.Google Scholar
34. Harbarth, S, Rutschmann, O, Sudre, P, Pittet, D. Impact of methicillin resistance on the outcome of patients with bacteremia caused by Staphylococcus aureus . Arch Intern Med 1998;158:182–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Murthy, A, De Angelis, G, Pittet, D, Schrenzel, J, Uckay, I, Harbarth, S. Cost-effectiveness of universal MRSA screening on admission to surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010;16:1747–1753; doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03220.x.Google Scholar
36. Otter, JA, Herdman, MT, Williams, B, Tosas, O, Edgeworth, JD, French, GL. Low prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage at hospital admission: implications for risk-factor-based vs universal screening. J Hosp Infect 2013;83:114–121; doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Williams, VR, Callery, S, Vearncombe, M, Simor, AE. Universal versus targeted active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in medical patients. Can J Infect Control 2011;26:105–112.Google Scholar
38. Harbarth, S, Fankhauser, C, Schrenzel, J, et al. Universal screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission and nosocomial infection in surgical patients. JAMA 2008;299:1149–1157; doi:10.1016/S0090-3671(09)79472-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Parvez, N, Jinadatha, C, Fader, R, et al. Universal MRSA nasal surveillance: characterization of outcomes at a tertiary care center and implications for infection control. South Med Assoc 2010;103:1084–1091.Google Scholar
40. Salgado, CD, Farr, BM. What proportion of hospital patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are identified by clinical microbiological cultures? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:116–121; doi:10.1086/500624.Google Scholar
41. Huang, SS, Hinrichsen, VL, Datta, R, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and hospitalization in high-risk patients in the year following detection. PLOS ONE 2011;6:e24340. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024340.Google Scholar
42. Girou, E, Azar, J, Wolkenstein, P, Cizeau, F, Brun-Buisson, C, Roujeau, JC. Comparison of systematic versus selective screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in a high-risk dermatology ward. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:583–587; doi:10.1086/501807.Google Scholar
43. Wibbenmeyer, L, Appelgate, D, Williams, I, et al. Effectiveness of universal screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to a burn-trauma step-down unit. J Burn Care Res 2009;30:648–656; doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181abff7e.Google Scholar
44. Robotham, JV, Jenkins, DR, Medley, GF. Screening strategies in surveillance and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Epidemiol Infect 2007;135:328–342; doi:10.1017/S095026880600687X.Google Scholar
45. McKinnell, JA, Bartsch, SM, Lee, BY, Huang, SS, Miller, LG. Cost-benefit analysis from the hospital perspective of universal active screening followed by contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:2–13; doi:10.1017/ice.2014.1.Google Scholar
46. Jarvis, WR, Jarvis, AA, Chinn, RY. National prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in inpatients at United States health care facilities, 2010. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:194–200. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.001.Google Scholar
47. Gidengil, CA, Gay, C, Huang, SS, Platt, R, Yokoe, D, Lee, GM. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infection in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:17–27; doi:10.1017/ice.2014.12.Google Scholar
48. Huang, SS, Septimus, E, Kleinman, K, et al. Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2255–2265; doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1207290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Deeny, SR, Cooper, BS, Cookson, B, Hopkins, S, Robotham, JV. Targeted versus universal screening and decolonization to reduce healthcare-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. J Hosp Infect 2013;85:33–44; doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2013.03.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50. Robotham, JV, Graves, N, Cookson, BD, et al. Screening, isolation, and decolonisation strategies in the control of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units: cost effectiveness evaluation. Br Med J 2011;343:d5694–d5694; doi:10.1136/bmj.d5694.Google Scholar