Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:17:07.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trends in Clostridium difficile Infection among Peripartum Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jennifer L. Kuntz ,
Ming Yang ,
Joseph Cavanaugh ,
Audrey F. Saftlas  and
Philip M. Polgreen
Jennifer L. Kuntz
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City
Ming Yang
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City
Joseph Cavanaugh
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City
Audrey F. Saftlas
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City
Philip M. Polgreen*
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City
*
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, (philip-polgreen_uiowa.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we conducted a study to determine whether rates of Clostridium difficile infection for delivery-associated hospitalizations are increasing. From 1998 to 2006, the number and incidence of C. difficile infection among peripartum women increased significantly. These increases were comparable to those observed in the general hospitalized population.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , May 2010 , pp. 532 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Elixhauser, A, Jhung, MA. Clostridium difficile-associated disease in US hospitals, 1993-2005. AHRQ working paper. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project statistical brief #50. 2008.Google Scholar
2.McFarland, LV, Beneda, HW, Clarridge, JE, Raugi, GJ. Implications of the changing face of Clostridium difficile disease for health care practitioners. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:237–253.Google Scholar
3.Benson, L, Song, X, Campos, J, Singh, N. Changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in children. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1233–1235.Google Scholar
4.Toltzis, P, Kim, J, Dul, M, Zoltanski, J, Smathers, S, Zaoutis, T. Presence of the epidemic North American pulsed field type 1 Clostridium difficile strain in hospitalized children. J Pediatr 2009;154:607–608.Google Scholar
5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Severe Clostridium diffidle-associated disease in populations previously at low risk—four states, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005;54:1201–1205.Google Scholar
6.Rouphael, NG, O'Donnell, JA, Bhatnagar, J, et al.Clostridium diffidle-associated diarrhea: an emerging threat to pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:635.el–e6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP NIS database documentation. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nisdbdocumentation.jsp. Updated 5 October 2009. Accessed 3 March 2009.Google Scholar
8.Bratzler, DW, Houck, PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup, et al.Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1706–1715.Google Scholar
9.Owens, RC Jr, Donskey, CJ, Gaynes, RP, Loo, VG, Muto, CA. Antimicrobial-associated risk factors for Clostridium diffidle infection. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46(suppl 1):S19–S31.Google Scholar