Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T17:25:35.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Total and Attributable Costs of Surgical-Wound Infections at a Canadian Tertiary-Care Center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Dick Zoutman ,
Shirley McDonald  and
Dilini Vethanayagan
Dick Zoutman*
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Department of Pathology, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Shirley McDonald
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Department of Pathology, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Dilini Vethanayagan
Affiliation:
Infection Control Service, Department of Pathology, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
*
Infection Control Service, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart SSt, Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada; [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the total and attributable costs of surgical-wound infections in a Canadian teaching hospital.

DESIGN: Retrospective incidence series study with chart review and examination of resource utilization attributable to wound infection. The charts of inpatients with wound infections were examined using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP), a validated chart review instrument designed to determine appropriateness of care, modified for wound infections.

SETTING: A university referral center in Canada.

PATIENTS: Medical records were abstracted from patients with wound infections who underwent an inpatient clean or clean-contaminated procedure during 1991.

MEASUREMENTS: During the wound-infection treatment period, the hospital costs associated with providing care were tabulated for all inpatient days and for outpatient and emergency visits. Costs taken into account included nursing salary and benefits, nonphysician professional services, operating room time, laboratory, pharmacy, supplies, ancillary tests, and hotel costs.

RESULTS: We identified 108 wound infections. Twenty-two patients required 28 surgical procedures related to a wound infection. Inpatient days totalled 1,116, costing $394,337. Fifty-five emergency and 42 clinic visits occurred, costing $27,193. By applying the AEP to the inpatient days, 833 days, or 10.2 days per case, were directly attributable to the wound infection. The hospital costs for inpatient care attributable to wound infections were $321,533 in total, or $3,937 per infection. Costs were distributed as follows: nursing, 51%; hotel, 14%; pharmacy, 10%; laboratory, 9%; emergency and outpatient clinic, 6%; professional services, 5%; operating room, 3%; and ancillary tests, 2%.

CONCLUSIONS: Wound infections contribute markedly to extra days of hospitalization and related costs. The AEP method is applied easily to determine attributable days of care and costs of wound infections, which are necessary to calculate the cost-benefit of infection control programs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , April 1998 , pp. 254 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Haley, RW. Measuring the costs of nosocomial infections: methods for estimating economic burden on the hospital. Am J Med 1991;91:32S–38S.Google Scholar
2. Wakefield, DS, Helms, CM, Massanari, RM, Mori, M, Pfaller, M. Cost of nosocomial infection: relative contributions of laboratory, antibiotic, and per diem costs in serious Staphylococcus aureus infections. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:185–192.Google Scholar
3. Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140.Google Scholar
4. Wakefield, DS, Pfaller, M, Ludke, RL, Wenzel, RP. Methods for estimating days of hospitalization due to nosocomial infections. Med Care 1992;30:373–376.Google Scholar
5. Winickoff, RN, Restuccia, JD, Fincke, BJ. Concurrent application of the appropriateness evaluation protocol to acute admissions in Department of Veterans' Affairs medical centers. Med Care 1991;29(suppl):AS64–AS76.Google Scholar
6. Wakefield, DS, Pfaller, MA, Hammons, GT, Massanari, RM. Use of the appropriateness evaluation protocol for estimating the incremental costs associated with nosocomial infections. Med Care 1987;25:481–488.Google Scholar
7. Gertman, PM, Restuccia, JD. The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Med Care 1981;XIX:855–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Haley, RW, Schaberg, DR, Crossley, KB, Von Allmen, SD, McGowan, JE Jr. Extra charges and prolongation of stay attributable to nosocomial infections: a prospective interhospital comparison. Am J Med 1981;70:51–58.Google Scholar
9. Haley, RW. Managing Hospital Infection Control for Cost Effectiveness: A Strategy for Reducing Infectious Complications. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Publishing, Inc; 1986.Google Scholar
10. Green, JW, Wenzel, RP. Postoperative wound infection: a controlled study of the increased duration of hospital stay and direct cost of hospitalization. Ann Surg 1977;185:264–268.Google Scholar
11. Olson, MM, Lee, JT Jr. Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance: results, advantages, and unanswered questions. Arch Surg 1990;125:794–803.Google Scholar
12. Centers for Disease Control. Public health focus: surveillance, prevention, and control of nosocomial infections. MMWR 1992;41:783–787.Google Scholar
13. Haley, RW, White, JW, Culver, DH, Hughes, JM. The financial incentive for hospitals to prevent nosocomial infections under the prospective payment system. An empirical determination from a nationally representative sample. JAMA 1987;257:1611–1614.Google Scholar
14. Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, Morgan, WM, Emori, TG, Munn, VP, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:182–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed