Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:24:49.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Uses of the Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) in Infection Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Tracy L. Gustafson
Tracy L. Gustafson*
Affiliation:
Infection Control and Prevention Analysts, Austin, Texas
*
Infection Control and Prevention Analysts, Inc., 515 S. Capital of Texas Highway, Suite 240, Austin, TX 78746 ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letter to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , April 2006 , pp. 427 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

References

1.Delgado-Rodriguez, M, Llorca, J. Caution should be exercised when using the standardized infection ratio. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005; 26:8–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Inskip, H, Beral, V, Fraser, P, Haskey, J. Methods for age adjustment of rates. Stat Med 1983; 2:455–466.Google Scholar
3.Julious, SA, Nicholl, J, George, S. Why do we continue to use standardized mortality ratios for small are comparisons? J Public Health Med 2001; 23:40–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Goldman, DA, Brender, JD. Are standardized mortality ratios valid for public health data analysis? Stat Med 2000; 19:1081–1088.Google Scholar
5.Gustafson, TL. Practical risk-adjusted quality control charts for infection control. Am J Infect Control 2000; 28:406–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Rothman, KJ. Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little-Brown Boston; 1986:41–49.Google Scholar