Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:06:31.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: Is the Glass Half Empty or More than 99% Full?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Deverick J. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Durham, North Carolina
Daniel J. Sexton
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Durham, North Carolina
*
DUMC Box 102359, Durham, NC 27710 ([email protected])

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. FastStats. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/insurg.htm. Accessed November 22, 2013.Google Scholar
2. Lewis, SS, Moehring, RW, Chen, LF, Sexton, DJ, Anderson, DJ. Assessing the relative burden of hospital-acquired infections in a network of community hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(11):12291230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Zimlichman, E, Henderson, D, Tamir, O, et al. Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(22): 20392046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Berrios-Torres, SI, Yi, SH, Bratzier, DW, et al. Activity of commonly used antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens against pathogens causing coronary artery bypass graft and arthroplasty surgical site infections in the United States, 2006-2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(3):231239 (in this issue).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Ming, DY, Chen, LF, Miller, BA, Anderson, DJ. The impact of depth of infection and postdischarge surveillance on rate of surgical-site infections in a network of community hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(3):276282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Mu, Y, Edwards, JR, Horan, TC, Berrios-Torres, SI, Fridkin, SK. Improving risk-adjusted measures of surgical site infection for the National Healthcare Safety Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(10):970986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Shahian, DM, O'Brien, SM, Filardo, G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1—coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88(suppl 1):S2S22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Henderson, WG, Daley, J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg 2009;198(suppl 5):S19S27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed