Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:28:01.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stick and Tell A Survey of Emergency Medicine Residents and Needlestick Exposures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jessica Zuraw ,
Gretchen Sanford ,
Lori Winston  and
Shu Chan
Jessica Zuraw*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern California Kaiser Permanente, Hayward, California
Gretchen Sanford
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwest Community Hospital, Arlington Heights, Illinois
Lori Winston
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Kaweah Delta Health Care District, Visalia, California
Shu Chan
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Presence Resurrection Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
*
27400 Hesperian Boulevard, Hayward, CA 94545 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An estimated 400,000–800,000 sharps-related injuries occur among healthcare workers (HCWs) annually in the United States. The risk of needlestick exposure may be particularly high among emergency medicine (EM) residents, who are learning new procedures in a relatively uncontrolled environment. Despite the potentially serious consequences of percutaneous injuries (PCIs), practitioners in training often down-play the occurrence of PCIs and do not report exposures.

Current literature implies that underreporting of needlestick injuries is multifactorial. By not seeking care after needlesticks occur and thereby delaying treatment, residents incur more risk from exposures. We sought to elucidate the underlying issues that might contribute to this lack of reporting needlestick injuries. Using an anonymous survey, we collected information regarding factors that contributed to sustaining a PCI as well as perceived barriers that prevented residents from reporting these exposures. This information is desirable for both residency programs and employee health departments to reduce the occurrence of unreported exposures.

The survey contained 19 questions, and all subjects were EM residents from the 8 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited programs in the state of Illinois during the period January–February 2011. The voluntary survey was distributed via e-mail and through a paper version distributed at a regional EM residency conference.

Type
Research Briefs
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 34 , Issue 10 , October 2013 , pp. 1116 - 1118
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Fisman, D, Harris, A, Rubin, M, et al.Fatigue increases the risk of injury from sharp devices in medical trainees: results from a case-crossover study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28(1):10–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Makary, M, Al-Attar, A, Holzmueller, C, et al.Needlestick injuries among surgeons in training. N Engl J Med 356;26:2693–2699.Google Scholar
3.Ayas, N, Barger, L, Cade, B, et al.Extended work duration and the risk of self-reported percutaneous injuries in interns. JAMA 2006;296(9):1055–1062.Google Scholar
4.Heald, A, Ransohoff, D. Needlestick injuries among resident physicians. J Gen Intern Med 1990;5:389–393.Google Scholar
5.Lee, C, Carter, W, Chiang, W, et al.Occupational exposures to blood among emergency medicine residents. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:1036–1043.Google Scholar
6.Foley, M, Leyden, A. Needlestick Safety and Prevention: Independent Study Module. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association, 2000.Google Scholar
7.Needlesticks remain an employee health challenge. Hosp Employee Health 2007;3–6.Google Scholar