Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:21:29.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should Test Methods for Disinfectants Use Vertebrate Viruses Dried on Carriers to Advance Virucidal Claims?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

M. Khalid Ijaz  and
Joseph Rubino
M. Khalid Ijaz*
Affiliation:
Reckitt Benckiser, Center of Innovation, One Philips Parkway, Montvale, New Jersey
Joseph Rubino
Affiliation:
Reckitt Benckiser, Center of Innovation, One Philips Parkway, Montvale, New Jersey
*
Reckitt Benckiser, Inc., Center of Innovation, One Philips Parkway, Montvale, NJ 07646 ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , February 2008 , pp. 192 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

References

1.Boone, SA, Gerba, CP. Significance of fomites in the spread of respiratory and enteric viral disease. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:1687–1696.Google Scholar
2.Kramer, A, Schwebke, I, Kampf, G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006;6:130. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2334-6-130.pdf/. Accessed August 13, 2007.Google Scholar
3.United States Environmental Protection Agency. Antimicrobial policy and guidance documents. Protocols. Washington, DC. 2000-2005. Available at: http://epa.gov/oppad001/regpolicy.htm. Accessed August 13, 2007.Google Scholar
4.Sanders, F. The role of the EPA in the regulation of antimicrobial pesticides in the United States. Pesticide Outlook 2003;14:65–75. Available at: http://www.rsc.org/delivery/_ArticleLinking/DisplayArticleForFree.cfm?doi = b314854h&JournalCode = PO. Accessed December 18, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Canadian General Standards Board. Assessment of Efficacy of Antimicrobial Agents for Use on Environmental Surfaces and Medical Devices. Document #CAN/CGSB-2.161-M97. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian General Standards Board; 1997.Google Scholar
6. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Guidelines for the evaluation of ster-ilants and disinfectants. Canberra, Australia: Governmentt of Australia; 1998.Google Scholar
7. British Standard EN 14476:2005. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Virucidal quantitative suspension test for chemical disinfectants and antiseptics used in human medicine—test method and requirements (phase 2, step 1). 2005.Google Scholar
8. European Standard EN 13610. Chemical disinfectants. Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of virucidal activity against bacteriophages of chemical disinfectants used in food and industrial areas—test method and requirements (phase 2, step 1). 1999.Google Scholar
9.Sehulster, LM, Chinn, RYW; Centers for Disease Control (CDC); Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities. Recommendations from the CDC and the HICPAC. MMWR 2003;52(RR-10):1–42. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwR/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5210al.htm. Accessed August 13, 2007.Google Scholar
10.Sattar, SA, Springthorpe, VS. Carrier tests to assess microbicidal activities of chemical disinfectants for use on medical devices and environmental surfaces. J AOAC Int 2005;88:182–201.Google Scholar