Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:10:51.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scenario-Based, Interactive Infection Prevention and Control and Bloodborne Pathogen Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2020

Rebecca Faller
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic
Priya Sampathkumar
Affiliation:
Mayo Graduate School of Medicine
Lisa Lande
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic
Seth Clarenbach
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPAC) and bloodborne pathogen (BBP) education are required for all healthcare workers at least annually by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and The Joint Commission. An inventory in 2016 at a large health system with >60,000 employees identified 46 different training modules used to fulfill this regulatory mandate. Objective: Using quality improvement tools and management, we sought to reduce duplication of effort, to enhance education, and to improve employee engagement. Methods: A multidisciplinary team that included IPAC, physician, nursing, educational designn and occupational safety was formed. The team reviewed regulatory standards, cross checked site-specific practices, and identified gaps in the current training structure. The goal was to create a module with multiple pathways that tailored regulatory content and delivery to the employee’s job responsibilities (Figs. 1 and 2). Results: The 46 individual training modules were replaced with 1 module that averaged 24.46 minutes to complete. Branching was incorporated that customized education to the employee’s role. The employee completion rate was 99% (n = 61,456). The scenario-based interactive approach engaged learners by challenging them to respond to real-life activities tailored to their level of risk. Most responders (87.4%) rated the learning activity as “good” or “excellent,” and 92.4% of responders agreed or strongly agreed that the activities in the course aided their learning. Conclusions: We leveraged adult learning principles and industry-proven instructional design activities to deliver interactive and relevant infection control training that met regulatory requirements and engaged employees through action-driven tasks. In 2018, the work group created fast paths for employees who had previously completed this module whereby they could revisit the original content and/or focus only on updates and targeted areas of interest. A pathway for laboratory workers involved in specimen handling and processing is planned next.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.