Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:41:02.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Risk of Infection Associated With Intra-arterial Catheters for Cancer Chemotherapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Issam Raad ,
Dima Abi-Said ,
Cesar H. Carrasco ,
Jan Umphrey  and
Lou Anne Hill
Issam Raad*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Specialties, Section of Infection Control, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Dima Abi-Said
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Specialties, Sections of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Cesar H. Carrasco
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Angiography/Interventional Radiology Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Jan Umphrey
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Specialties, Section of Infection Control, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Lou Anne Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Specialties, Section of Infection Control, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Angiography/Interventional Radiology Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
*
Section of Infection Control, Box 47, UTMD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the frequency of, and risk factors for, infections associated with intra-arterial catheters used for cancer chemotherapy.

Methods:

Between September 1992 and September 1995, we conducted a surveillance study of all 807 intra-arterial catheters placed for chemotherapy at our center. The insertion site was disinfected with povidone iodine and alcohol, and the arterial catheter was placed using maximal sterile barrier precautions. Upon removal, all intravascular segments were submitted for semiquantitative culture.

Results:

No episodes of catheter-related bloodstream infection (95% confidence interval [CI95], 0%-1.6%) were observed. However, the risk of colonization (>15 colony-forming units) of arterial catheters was 15% (CI95, 12%-17%). Retrospective risk-factor analysis conducted on 224 intra-arterial catheters placed for chemotherapy in 1993 showed that colonization was associated significantly with duration of catheterization (median of 1 day for culture-negative catheters vs median of 4 days for culture-positive catheters, P<.001). Age, gender, prior radiotherapy, underlying cancer, neutropenia, and hypoalbuminemia were not associated with catheter colonization.

Conclusion:

Intra-arterial catheters for cancer chemotherapy placed under maximal sterile barrier precautions for a short period of time are associated with a very low risk of bloodstream infection.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 19 , Issue 9 , September 1998 , pp. 640 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Burrows, JH, Talley, RW, Drake, EH, Tucker, WG. Infusion of fluorinated pyrimidines into hepatic artery for treatment of metastatic carcinoma of liver. Cancer 1967;20:1886–1892.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Massey, WH, Fletcher, WS, Judkins, MP. Hepatic artery infusion for metastatic malignancy using percutaneously placed catheters. Am J Surg 1971;121:160–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Tandon, RN, Bunnell, IL, Cooper, RG. The treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the liver by the percutaneous selective hepatic artery infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Surgery 1973;73:118–121.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Mavligit, GM, Zukiwski, AA, Charnsangavej, C, Carrasco, CH, Wallace, W, Gutterman, JU. Regional biologic therapy. Hepatic arterial infusion of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor in patients with liver metastases. Cancer 1992;69(2):557–561.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Pearson, ML and the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:438–473.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Maki, DG, McCormick, RD, Uman, SJ, Wirtanen, GW. Septic endarterities due to intra- arterial catheters for cancer chemotherapy. I. Evaluation of an outbreak. II. Risk factors, clinical features and management, III. Guidelines for prevention. Cancer 1979;14:1228–1240.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Maki, DG, Weise, CE, Sarafin, HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter-related infections. N Engl J Med 1977;296:1305–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kloos, WE, Wolfshohl, JF. Identification of Staphylococcus species with the API STAPH-IDENT System. J Clin Microbiol 1982;16:509–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Band, JD, Maki, DG. Infections caused by arterial catheters for hemodynamic monitoring. Am J Med 1979;67:734–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Raad, I, Umphrey, J, Khan, A, Truett, LJ, Bodey, GP. The duration of placement as a predictor of peripheral and pulmonary arterial catheter infections. J Hosp Infect 1993;23:17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed