Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:40:02.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of Evidence for Alcohol-Based Skin Preparation Agents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

AkkeNeel Talsma  and
Carol E. Chenoweth
AkkeNeel Talsma*
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Carol E. Chenoweth
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Health System, Infectious Diseases, Ann Arbor, Michigan
*
School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 North Ingalls, Room 4154, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 33 , Issue 10 , October 2012 , pp. 1059 - 1060
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

References

1.HHS seeks comment on National Action Plan to eliminate healthcare-associated infections. US Department of Health and Human Services website, http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2012pres/04/20120419a.html. Published 2012. Accessed April 2012.Google Scholar
2.Bratzier, DW, Houck, PM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1706–1715.Google Scholar
3.Nicholas, LH, Osborne, NH, Birkmeyer, JD, Dimick, JB. Hospital process compliance and surgical outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Surg 2010;145(10):999–1004.Google Scholar
4.Garcia, R. Surgical skin antisepsis. Periop Nurs Clin 2010;5:457–477.Google Scholar
5.NQF maintains endorsement of safe practice to prevent surgical site infection. National Quality Forum website, www.qualityforum.org/News_And_Resources/Press_Releases/2011/NQF_Maintains_Endorsement_of_Safe_Practice_to_Prevent_Surgical_Site_Infection.aspx. Published 2011. Accessed April 2012.Google Scholar
6.Swenson, BR, Hendrick, TL, Metzger, R, Bonatti, H, Pruett, TL, Sawyer, RG. Effects of preoperative skin preparation on postoperative wound infection rates: a prospective study of 3 skin preparation protocols. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30(10):964–971.Google Scholar
7.Darouiche, RO, Wall, MJ, Itani, K, et al.Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010;362(1):18–26.Google Scholar
8.Lee, I, Agarwal, RK, Lee, BY, Fishman, NO, Umscheid, CA. Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of Chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(12): 1219–1229.Google Scholar
9.Noorani, A, Rabey, N, Walsh, SR, Davies, RJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative antisepsis with Chlorhexidine versus povidine-iodine in clean-contaminated surgery. Br J Surg 2010;97:1614–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Paocharoen, V, Mingmalairak, C, Apisarnthanarak, A. Comparison of surgical wound infection after preoperative skin preparation with 4% Chlorhexidine and povidone iodine: a prospective randomized trial. J Med Assoc Thailand 2009;92(7):898–902.Google Scholar
11.Berry, AR, Wabb, B, Goldacre, MJ. A comparison of the use of povidone-iodine and Chlorhexidine in the prophylaxis of postoperative wound infection. J Hosp Infect 1982;3(1):55–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed