Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:31:16.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Surgeon-Specific Infection Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Richard C. Rose III  and
Paula Horton
Richard C. Rose III
Affiliation:
Knoxville, Tennessee
Paula Horton
Affiliation:
Knoxville, Tennessee
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Departments
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , April 1989 , pp. 142
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1989

References

1. Scheckler, WE: Surgeon-specific wound infection rates—A potentially dangerous and misleading strategy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1988: 9:145–146.10.2307/30145420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed