Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:49:28.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Respiratory viruses on personal protective equipment and bodies of healthcare workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2019

Linh T. Phan
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ilinois
Dagmar Sweeney
Affiliation:
Sequencing Core, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Dayana Maita
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Donna C. Moritz
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Susan C. Bleasdale
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Rachael M. Jones*
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ilinois
*
Author for correspondence: Rachael M. Jones, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

To characterize the magnitude of virus contamination on personal protective equipment (PPE), skin, and clothing of healthcare workers (HCWs) who cared for patients having acute viral infections.

Design:

Prospective observational study.

Setting:

Acute-care academic hospital.

Participants:

A total of 59 HCWs agreed to have their PPE, clothing, and/or skin swabbed for virus measurement.

Methods:

The PPE worn by HCW participants, including glove, face mask, gown, and personal stethoscope, were swabbed with Copan swabs. After PPE doffing, bodies and clothing of HCWs were sampled with Copan swabs: hand, face, and scrubs. Preamplification and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods were used to quantify viral RNA copies in the swab samples.

Results:

Overall, 31% of glove samples, 21% of gown samples, and 12% of face mask samples were positive for virus. Among the body and clothing sites, 21% of bare hand samples, 11% of scrub samples, and 7% of face samples were positive for virus. Virus concentrations on PPE were not statistically significantly different than concentrations on skin and clothing under PPE. Virus concentrations on the personal stethoscopes and on the gowns were positively correlated with the number of torso contacts (P < .05). Virus concentrations on face masks were positively correlated with the number of face mask contacts and patient contacts (P < .05).

Conclusions:

Healthcare workers are routinely contaminated with respiratory viruses after patient care, indicating the need to ensure that HCWs complete hand hygiene and use other PPE to prevent dissemination of virus to other areas of the hospital. Modifying self-contact behaviors may decrease the presence of virus on HCWs.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2019 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Aspects of these data were presented at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Expo on May 21, 2019, in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

References

Morgan, DJ, Liang, SY, Smith, CL, et al. Frequent multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii contamination of gloves, gowns, and hands of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:716721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munoz-Price, LS, Arheart, KL, Mills, JP, et al. Associations between bacterial contamination of health care workers’ hands and contamination of white coats and scrubs. Am J Infect Control 2012;40(9):e245e248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okamoto, K, Rhee, Y, Schoeny, M, et al. Impact of doffing errors on healthcare worker self-contamination when caring for patients on contact precautions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 209;40:559565.Google Scholar
Phan, LT, Maita, D, Mortiz, DC, et al. Personal protective equipment doffing practices of healthcare workers. J Occup Environ Hyg 2019;16:575581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casanova, L, Teal, LJ, Sickbert-Bennett, EE, et al. Assessment of self-contamination during removal of personal protective equipment for Ebola patient care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37(10):16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casanova, L, Alfano-Sobsey, E, Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ, Sobsey, M. Virus transfer from personal protective equipment to healthcare employees’ skin and clothing. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14:12911293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, JH, Burnham, C-AD, Reske, KA, et al. Assessment of healthcare worker protocol deviations and self-contamination during personal protective equipment donning and doffing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:10771083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mumma, JM, Durso, FT, Ferguson, AN, et al. Human factors risk analyses of a doffing protocol for Ebola-level personal protective equipment: mapping errors to contamination. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:950958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, A, Schwebke, I, Kampf, G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006;6:130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phan, LT, Maita, D, Mortiz, DC, Bleasdale, SC, Jones, RM. Environmental contact and self-contact patterns of healthcare workers: implications for infection prevention and control. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69(suppl 3):S178S184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phan, LT, Sweeney, DM, Bleasdale, SC, Jones, RM. Respiratory viruses in the patient environment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holleck, JL, Merchant, N, Lin, S, Gupta, S. Can education influence stethoscope hygiene? Am J Infect Control 2017;45:811812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knecht, VR, Mcginniss, JE, Shankar, HM, et al. Molecular analysis of bacterial contamination on stethoscopes in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, GW, Lee, D, Treffiletti, A, Hrsak, M, Shugart, J, Vinjé, J. Evaluation of a new environmental sampling protocol for detection of human norovirus on inanimate surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:59875992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicas, M, Jones, RM. Relative Contributions of four exposure pathways to influenza infection risk. Risk Anal 2009;29:12921303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R, Xia, J. Occupational exposures to influenza among healthcare workers in the United States. J Occup Environ Hyg 2016;13:213222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Phan et al. supplementary material

Phan et al. supplementary material

Download Phan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15.9 KB