No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Reply to Petersen
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0899823X00193201/resource/name/firstPage-S0899823X00193201a.jpg)
- Type
- Letter to the Editor
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.
References
1.
Petersen, B. Monitoring of endoscope reprocessing: accumulating data but best practices remain undefined. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2014;35:995–997.Google Scholar
2.
Visrodia, KH, Ofstead, CL, Yellin, HL, et al. The use of rapid indicators for the detection of organic residues on clinically used gastrointestinal endoscopes with and without visually apparent debris. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2014;35:987–994.Google Scholar
3.
Dirlam Langlay, AM, Ofstead, CL, Mueller, NJ, et al. Reported gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing lapses: the tip of the iceberg. Am J Infect Control
2013;41(12):1188–1194.Google Scholar
4.
Aumeran, C, Poincloux, L, Souweine, B, et al. Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy
2010;42(11):895–899.Google Scholar
5.
Carbonne, A, Thiolet, JM, Fournier, S, et al. Control of a multi-hospital outbreak of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae type 2 in France, September to October 2009. Euro Surveill
2010;15(48):1–6.Google Scholar
6.
Frias, M, Tsai, V, Moulton-Meissner, H, et al. Notes from the field: New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography—Illinois, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2014;62(51/52):1051.Google Scholar
7.
Alfa, MJ, Degagne, P, Olson, N. Worst-case soiling levels for patient-used flexible endoscopes before and after cleaning. Am J Infect Control
1999;27(5):392–401.Google Scholar
8.
Alfa, MJ, Fatima, I, Olson, N. Validation of adenosine triphosphate to audit manual cleaning of flexible endoscope channels. Am J Infect Control
2013;41(3):245–248.Google Scholar
9.
Alfa, MJ, Fatima, I, Olson, N. The adenosine triphosphate test is a rapid and reliable audit tool to assess manual cleaning adequacy of flexible endoscope channels. Am J Infect Control
2013;41(3):249–253.Google Scholar
10.
Fushimi, R, Takashina, M, Yoshikawa, H, et al. Comparison of adenosine triphosphate, microbiological load, and residual protein as indicators for assessing the cleanliness of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Am J Infect Control
2013;41(2):161–164.Google Scholar
11.
Turner, DE, Daugherity, EK, Altier, C, Maurer, KJ. Efficacy and limitations of an ATP-based monitoring system. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci
2010;49(2):190–195.Google Scholar
12.
Hansen, D, Benner, D, Hilgenhoner, M, Leisebein, T, Brauksiepe, A, Popp, W. ATP measurement as method to monitor the quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes. Ger Med Sci
2004;2:Doc04.Google Scholar
13.
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Standard 58: Chemical Sterilization and High-Level Disinfection in Health Care Facilities. Arlington, VA: AAMI, 2010.Google Scholar