Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:13:06.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to Maiwald et al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Pracha Nuntnarumit*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Nartsiri Sangsuksawang
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
*
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand10400 ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2013

References

1.Maiwald, M, Petney, TN, Assam, PN, Chan, ES-Y. Use of statistics as another factor leading to an overestimation of chlorhexidine's role in skin antisepsis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(8): 872873.Google Scholar
2.Nuntnarumit, P, Sangsuksawang, N. A randomized controlled trial of 1% aqueous Chlorhexidine gluconate compared with 10% povidone-iodine for topical antiseptic in neonates: effects on blood culture contamination rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(4):430432.Google Scholar
3.Chapman, AK, Aucott, SW, Milstone, AM. Safety of Chlorhexidine gluconate used for skin antisepsis in the preterm infant. J Perinatol 2012;32(1):49.Google Scholar
4.Reynolds, PR, Banerjee, S, Meek, JH. Alcohol burns in extremely low birthweight infants: still occurring. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90(1):F10. doi:10.1136/adc.2004.054338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed