Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:45:03.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to Goldenberg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Kimberlee S. Fong*
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Department of Infectious Disease, Cleveland, Ohio
Cynthia Fatica
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Infection Control, Cleveland, Ohio
Geraldine Hall
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Laboratory, Cleveland, Ohio
Gary Procop
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Laboratory, Cleveland, Ohio
Susan Schindler
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Laboratory, Cleveland, Ohio
Steven M. Gordon
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Department of Infectious Disease, Cleveland, Ohio
Thomas G. Fraser
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Department of Infectious Disease, Cleveland, Ohio
*
Cleveland Clinic Department of Infectious Disease, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195 ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011

References

1. Goldenberg, SD. Public reporting of Clostridium difficile and im¬provements in diagnostic tests. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(12):12311233 (in this issue).Google Scholar
2. Fong, KS, Fatica, C, Hall, G, et al. Impact of PCR testing for Clostridium difficile on incident rates and potential on public reporting: is the playing field level? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(9):932933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Alston, WK. Pitfalls of public reporting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(9):985986.Google Scholar
4. Harris, AD, McGregor, JC. The importance of case-mix adjustment for infection rates and the need for more research. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(8):693694.Google Scholar