Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:07:51.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relative Efficacy of Respirators and Room Ventilation in Preventing Occupational Tuberculosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Kevin P. Fennelly*
Affiliation:
National Jewish Medical and Research Center and the, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
Edward A. Nardell
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School and the Cambridge Hospital, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, 1400 Jackson St, Denver, CO 80206; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives:

To evaluate the relative efficacy of personal respiratory protection as the concentrations of infectious aerosols increase or as room ventilation rates decrease.

Methods:

We modified the Wells-Riley mathematical model of airborne transmission of disease by adding a variable for respirator leakage. We modeled three categories of infectiousness using various room ventilation rates and classes of respirators over a 10-hour exposure period.

Results:

The risk of infection decreases exponentially with increasing room ventilation or with increasing personal respiratory protection. The relative efficacy of personal respiratory protection decreases as room ventilation rates increase or as the concentrations of infectious aerosols decrease.

Conclusions:

These modeling data suggest that the risk of occupational tuberculosis probably can be lowered considerably by using relatively simple respirators combined with modest room ventilation rates for the infectious aerosols likely to be present in isolation rooms of newly diagnosed patients. However, more sophisticated respirators may be needed to achieve a comparable risk reduction for exposures to more highly concentrated aerosols, such as may be generated during cough-inducing procedures or autopsies involving infectious patients. There is probably minimal benefit to the use of respirators in well-ventilated isolation rooms with patients receiving appropriate therapy

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jarvis, WR. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Res Microbiol 1993;144:117122.Google Scholar
2. McKenna, MT, Hutton, M, Cauthen, G, Onorato, IM. The association between occupation and tuberculosis: a population-based survey. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:587–93.Google Scholar
3. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Proportionate mortality from pulmonary tuberculosis associated with occupations-28 states, 1979-1990. MMWR 1995;44:1419.Google Scholar
4. Centers for Disease Control. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of tuberculosis in health-care settings, with special focus on HIV-related issues. MMWR 1990;39(RR-17).Google Scholar
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care facilities, 1994. MMWR 1994;43(RR-13).Google Scholar
6. McDiarmid, M, Gamponia, MJ, Ryan, MAK, Hirshon, JM, Gillen, NA, Cox, M. Tuberculosis in the workplace: OSHA's compliance experience. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:159164.Google Scholar
7. Winters, RE. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of tuberculosis: a better solution? Clin Infectious Dis 1994;19:309310.Google Scholar
8. Dunlap, N, Bailey, WC, Bass, JBJ, Boyd, WW, Sutton, FD, Tally, WJ. Occupational exposure to tuberculosis: risk and consequences. Chest 1994;106:658659.Google Scholar
9. Iseman, MD. A leap of faith. What can we do to curtail intrainstituional transmission of tuberculosis? Ann Intern Med 1992;117:251253.Google Scholar
10. American Health Consultants, Inc. Special report: TB infection control. CDC: many hospitals unprepared as MDR-TB reported nationwide. Hosp Infect Control 1993;20:1732; Rivenbank L. Workers urge better protection against TB. Federal Times November 13, 1995:27.Google Scholar
11. Rivenbark, L. Workers urge better protection against TB. Federal Times; 1995.Google Scholar
12. Nelson, H. USA: objections to protective respirators. Lancet 1992;340:1088.Google Scholar
13. Nettleman, MD, Frederickson, M, Good, NL, Hunter, SA. Tuberculosis control strategies: the cost of particulate respirators. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:3740.Google Scholar
14. Adal, KA, Anglim, AM, Palumbo, CL, Titus, MG, Coyner, BJ, Farr, BM. The use of high-efficiency particulate respirators to protect hospital workers from tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1994;331:169173.Google Scholar
15. Riley, RL, Mills, CC, O'Grady, F, Sultan, LU, Wittestadt, F, Shivipuri, DN. Infectiousness of air from a tuberculosis ward-ultraviolet irradiation of infected air: comparative infectiousness of different patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1962;85:511525.Google Scholar
16. Nardell, EA, Keegan, J, Cheney, SA, Etkind, SC. Airborne infection: theoretical limits of protection achievable by building ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:302306.Google Scholar
17. Catanzaro, A. Nosocomial tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;125:559562.Google Scholar
18. Templeton, GL, Illing, LA, Young, L, Cave, D, Stead, WW, Bates, JH. The risk of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis at the bedside and during autopsy. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:922925.Google Scholar
19. Riley, RL, O'Grady, F. Airborne Infection. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1961.Google Scholar
20. Stille, WT, Riley, EC. Computer simulation of measles epidemic in school children. Presented at the American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; 11 1973; San Francisco, CA. Abstract.Google Scholar
21. Riley, EC, Murphy, G, Riley, RL. Airborne spread of measles in a suburban elementary school. Am J Epidemiol 1978;107:421432.Google Scholar
22. Nicas, M. Respiratory protection and the risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Am J Ind Med 1995;27:317333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Hodous, TK, Coffey, CC. The role of respiratory protective devices in the control of tuberculosis. Occup Med 1994;9(4):631657.Google ScholarPubMed
24. Guy, HP. Respirator performance terminology. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1985;46:B22B24.Google Scholar
25. American National Standards Institute. American National Standard for Respiratory Protection. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute; 1992.Google Scholar
26. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Regulations, Documents, and Technical Information. OSHA CD-ROM (OSHA A97-1). Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, part 1910.1043. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor; 02 1997.Google Scholar
27. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Regulations, Documents, and Technical Information. OSHA CD- ROM (OSHA A97-1). Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, part 1910.1027. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor; 02 1997.Google Scholar
28. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Respirator Decision Logic. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH; 1987.Google Scholar
29. Wenger, PN, Otten, J, Orfas, D, Beck-Sagu, CM, Jarvis, WR. Control of nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis among healthcare workers and HIV-infected patients. Lancet 1995;345:235240.Google Scholar
30. Maloney, SA, Pearson, ML, Gordon, MT, Del Castillo, R, Boyle, JF, Jarvis, WR. Efficacy of control measures in preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis to patients and health care workers Ann Intern Med 1995;122:9095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Blumberg, HM, Watkins, DL, Berschling, JD, Antle, A, Moore, P, White, N, et al. Preventing the nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:658663.Google Scholar
32. Fridkin, SK, Manangan, L, Bolyard, E, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Jarvis, WR. SHEA-CDC TB survey, part II: efficacy of TB infection control programs at member hospitals, 1992. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:135140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Harber, P, Barnhart, S, Boehlecke, BA, Beckett, WS, Gerrity, T, McDiarmid, MA, et al. Respiratory protection guidelines. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:11531165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Griffith, DE, Hardeman, JL, Zhang, Y, Wallace, RJ, Mazurek, GH. Tuberculosis outbreak among healthcare workers in a community hospital. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:808811.Google Scholar
35. Nicas, M. Estimating exposure intensity in an imperfectly mixed room. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1996;57:542550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Miller-Leiden, S, Lobascio, C, Nazaroff, WW, Macher, JM. Effectiveness of in-room air filtration and dilution ventilation for tuberculosis infection control. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 1996;46:869882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Malasky, C, Jordan, T, Potulski, F, Reichman, LB. Occupational tuberculous infections among pulmonary physicians in training. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;142:505507.Google Scholar
38. Stead, WW, Senner, JW, Reddick, WT, Lofgren, JP. Racial differences in susceptibility to infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis . N Engl J Med 1990;322:422427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Bellamy, R, Ruwende, C, Corrah, T, McAdam, KPWJ, Whittle, HC, Hill, AVS. Variations in the NRAMP1 gene and susceptibility to tuberculosis in West Africans. N Engl J Med 1998;338:640644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Valway, SE, Sanchez, MPC, Shinnick, TF, Orme, I, Agerton, T, Hoy, D, et al. An outbreak involving extensive transmission of a virulent strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . N Engl J Med 1998;338:633639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Bloom, BR, Small, PM. The evolving relation between human and Mycobacterium tuberculosis . N Engl J Med 1998;677678.Google Scholar