Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:52:23.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Cleaning to Reduce Contamination of Healthcare Worker Gowns and Gloves with Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Aaron S. Hess*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Michelle Shardell
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
J. Kristie Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Kerri A. Thom
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Mary-Claire Roghmann
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Giora Netzer
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Sania Amr
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Daniel J. Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
*
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, MSTF 362, 685 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201 ([email protected])

Abstract

Objective.

To determine whether enhanced daily cleaning would reduce contamination of healthcare worker (HCW) gowns and gloves with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB).

Design.

A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Setting.

Four intensive care units (ICUs) in an urban tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS.

ICU rooms occupied by patients colonized with MRSA or MDRAB.

INTERVENTION.

Extra enhanced daily cleaning of ICU room surfaces frequently touched by HCWs.

Results.

A total of 4,444 cultures were collected from 132 rooms over 10 months. Using fluorescent dot markers at 2,199 surfaces, we found that 26% of surfaces in control rooms were cleaned and that 100% of surfaces in experimental rooms were cleaned (P < .001). The mean proportion of contaminated HCW gowns and gloves following routine care provision and before leaving the rooms of patients with MDRAB was 16% among control rooms and 12% among experimental rooms (relative risk, 0.77 [95% confidence interval, 0.28-2.11]; P = .23). For MRSA, the mean proportions were 22% and 19%, respectively (relative risk, 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.53]; P = .16).

Discussion.

Intense enhanced daily cleaning of ICU rooms occupied by patients colonized with MRSA or MDRAB was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in contamination of HCW gowns and gloves after routine patient care activities. Further research is needed to determine whether intense environmental cleaning will lead to significant reductions and fewer infections.

Trial Registration.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01481935.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kramer, A, Schwebke, I, Kampf, G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006;6:130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Dancer, SJ. Mopping up hospital infection. J Hosp Infect 1999;43(2):85100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Carling, PC, Bartley, JM. Evaluating hygienic cleaning in health care settings: what you do not know can harm your patients. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(5 suppl 1):S41S50.Google Scholar
4.Hayden, MK, Blom, DW, Lyle, EA, Moore, CG, Weinstein, RA. Risk of hand or glove contamination after contact with patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus or the colonized patients' environment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(2):149154.Google Scholar
5.Goodman, ER, Platt, R, Bass, R, Onderdonk, AB, Yokoe, DS, Huang, SS. Impact of an environmental cleaning intervention on the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on surfaces in intensive care unit rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(7):593599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Eckstein, BC, Adams, DA, Eckstein, EC, et al.Reduction of Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus contamination of environmental surfaces after an intervention to improve cleaning methods. BMC Infect Dis 2007;7:61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Dancer, SJ, White, LF, Lamb, J, Girvan, EK, Robertson, C. Measuring the effect of enhanced cleaning in a UK hospital: a prospective cross-over study. BMC Med 2009;7:28.Google Scholar
8.Wilson, AP, Smyth, D, Moore, G, et al.The impact of enhanced cleaning within the intensive care unit on contamination of the near-patient environment with hospital pathogens: a randomized crossover study in critical care units in two hospitals. Crit Care Med 2011;39(4):651658.Google Scholar
9.Nerandzic, MM, Cadnum, JL, Pultz, MJ, Donskey, CJ. Evaluation of an automated ultraviolet radiation device for decontamination of Clostridium difficile and other healthcare-associated pathogens in hospital rooms. BMC Infect Dis 2010;10:197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Maclean, M, Macgregor, SJ, Anderson, JG, et al.Environmental decontamination of a hospital isolation room using high-intensity narrow-spectrum light. J Hosp Infect 2010;76(3):247251.Google Scholar
11.Hacek, DM, Ogle, AM, Fisher, A, Robicsek, A, Peterson, LR. Significant impact of terminal room cleaning with bleach on reducing nosocomial Clostridium difficile. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(5):350353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Guh, A, Carling, PC; Environmental Evaluation Workgroup. Options for Evaluating Environmental Cleaning. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010.Google Scholar
13.Diab-Elschahawi, M, Assadian, O, Blacky, A, et al.Evaluation of the decontamination efficacy of new and reprocessed microfiber cleaning cloth compared with other commonly used cleaning cloths in the hospital. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(4):289292.Google Scholar
14.Falagas, ME, Thomaidis, PC, Kotsantis, IK, Sgouros, K, Samonis, G, Karageorgopoulos, DE. Airborne hydrogen peroxide for disinfection of the hospital environment and infection control: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2011;78(3):171177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Otter, JA, Yezli, S, Schouten, MA, van Zanten, AR, Houmes-Zielman, G, Nohlmans-Paulssen, MK. Hydrogen peroxide vapor decontamination of an intensive care unit to remove environmental reservoirs of multidrug-resistant gram-negative rods during an outbreak. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(9):754756.Google Scholar
16.Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Dumigan, DG, Golebiewski, M, Balogun, O, Rizvani, R. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30(7):678684.Google Scholar
17.Carling, PC, Von Beheren, S, Kim, P, Woods, C; Healthcare Environmental Hygiene Study Group. Intensive care unit environmental cleaning: an evaluation in sixteen hospitals using a novel assessment tool. J Hosp Infect 2008;68(1):3944.Google Scholar
18.Malik, RE, Cooper, RA, Griffith, CJ. Use of audit tools to evaluate the efficacy of cleaning systems in hospitals. Am J Infect Control 2003;31(3):181187.Google Scholar
19.Wilcox, MH, Fawley, WN, Wigglesworfh, N, Parnell, P, Verity, P, Freeman, J. Comparison of the effect of detergent versus hypochlorite cleaning on environmental contamination and incidence of Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect 2003;54(2):109114.Google Scholar
20.Morgan, DJ, Rogawski, E, Thom, KA, et al.Transfer of multidrug-resistant bacteria to healthcare workers' gloves and gowns after patient contact increases with environmental contamination. Crit Care Med 2012;40(4):10451051.Google Scholar
21.Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA, Miller, MB, Huslage, K, Sickbert-Bennett, E. Role of hospital surfaces in the transmission of emerging health care-associated pathogens: norovirus, Clostridium difficile, and Acinetobacter species. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(5 suppl 1):S25S33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Carling, PC, Briggs, J, Hylander, D, Perkins, J. An evaluation of patient area cleaning in 3 hospitals using a novel targeting methodology. Am J Infect Control 2006;34(8):513519.Google Scholar
23.Carling, PC, Parry, MM, Rupp, ME, et al; Healthcare Environmental Hygiene Study Group. Improving cleaning of the environment surrounding patients in 36 acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(11):10351041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Carling, PC, Parry, MF, Bruno-Murtha, LA, Dick, B. Improving environmental hygiene in 27 intensive care units to decrease multidrug-resistant bacterial transmission. Crit Care Med 2010;38(4):10541059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Snyder, GM, Thom, KA, Furuno, JP, et al.Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on the gowns and gloves of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(7):583589.Google Scholar
26.Morgan, DJ, Liang, SY, Smith, CL, et al.Frequent multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii contamination of gloves, gowns, and hands of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(7):716721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Donner, A, Klar, N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
28.Boyce, JM, Potter-Bynoe, G, Chenevert, C, King, T. Environmental contamination due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: possible infection control implications. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18(9):622627.Google Scholar