Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:43:58.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospective Validation of Central Line–Days Derived From an Electronic Medical Record System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

John M. Boyce ,
George Paci ,
Carl Feidner ,
Lori Hubbard ,
Laurie Devin ,
Lenore Reilly ,
Anthony Gentile  and
Jonathan M. Siner
John M. Boyce*
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
George Paci
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
Carl Feidner
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
Lori Hubbard
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
Laurie Devin
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
Lenore Reilly
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
Anthony Gentile
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
Jonathan M. Siner
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
*
Address correspondence to John M. Boyce, MD, Yale-New Haven Hospital, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06510 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Validation of the number of central line–days by hospitals is required by the National Healthcare Safety Network. A prospective study that compared a daily report of such days generated by an electronic medical record with observational audits by nurses revealed that the report was 100% sensitive and 99.9% specific.

Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(9):1098–1099

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 36 , Issue 9 , September 2015 , pp. 1098 - 1099
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) overview—2014. www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/validation/pcsManual-2014-valid.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed January 10, 2015.Google Scholar
2. Wright, MO, Fisher, A, John, M, Reynolds, K, Peterson, LR, Robicsek, A. The electronic medical record as a tool for infection surveillance: successful automation of device-days. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:364–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Hota, B, Harting, B, Weinstein, RA, et al. Electronic algorithmic prediction of central vascular catheter use. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:4–11.Google Scholar
4. Tejedor, SC, Garrett, G, Jacob, JT, et al. Electronic documentation of central venous catheter–days: validation is essential. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:900–907.Google Scholar
5. Thompson, ND, Edwards, JR, Bamberg, W, et al. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling to estimate central line–days: simplification of the National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance methods. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:221–228.Google Scholar
6. Klevens, RM, Tokars, JI, Edwards, J, Horan, T. Sampling for collection of central line–day denominators in surveillance of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:338–342.Google Scholar
7. Shelly, MA, Concannon, C, Dumyati, G. Device use ratio measured weekly can reliably estimate central line–days for central line–associated bloodstream infection rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:727–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Backman, LA, Nobert, G, Melchreit, R, Fekieta, R, Dembry, LM. Validation of the surveillance and reporting of central line-associated bloodstream infection denominator data. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:28–33.Google Scholar